Pages: 1 … 175 176 177 178 179 … 227
you cannot take 2 enemies at close range when they are both firing at you. This game is meant to be a kill one person die kill one person die over and over and over. The only way you can get a >2 ratio is sitting back at range and killing people. CQB is a matter of who see's their enemy first.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Sure I can. I don't play a lot of rush but it isn't too difficult. I try to be a team player as much as I can. Some of that involves defending flags too.
If would be a diffrent story if this game had insta-heals, clearly defined hitbox exploits, prone, and easy cover..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
you cannot take 2 enemies at close range when they are both firing at you. This game is meant to be a kill one person die kill one person die over and over and over. The only way you can get a >2 ratio is sitting back at range and killing people. CQB is a matter of who see's their enemy first.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Sure I can. I don't play a lot of rush but it isn't too difficult. I try to be a team player as much as I can. Some of that involves defending flags too.
Last edited by Ilocano (2010-07-10 14:09:42)
No surprise. It's not EA would actually do things right or anything.genius_man16 wrote:
"RT @Demize99: AT4 was over effective in destroying armor when paired with explosive+. It was interrupting the balance of veh vs inf."
Wow, DICE is even more retarded than I thought.
As a tank driver I was infinitely more afraid of CG's + explosive than I was with AT4 + explosive
AT4 is incredibly easy to avoid, whereas CG's can be fired from across the map if you're tracered.
I have no idea why that guy is still in charge of weapon balance after what he did to the game in R7. He is ruining everything.genius_man16 wrote:
"RT @Demize99: AT4 was over effective in destroying armor when paired with explosive+. It was interrupting the balance of veh vs inf."
yeah seriously, you barely see people using it.its balanced because its real slow to reload and you have to have skill to guide itSpidery_Yoda wrote:
I have no idea why that guy is still in charge of weapon balance after what he did to the game in R7. He is ruining everything.genius_man16 wrote:
"RT @Demize99: AT4 was over effective in destroying armor when paired with explosive+. It was interrupting the balance of veh vs inf."
They are the master's of fucking up their own games.Blade4509 wrote:
No surprise. It's not EA would actually do things right or anything.genius_man16 wrote:
"RT @Demize99: AT4 was over effective in destroying armor when paired with explosive+. It was interrupting the balance of veh vs inf."
Wow, DICE is even more retarded than I thought.
As a tank driver I was infinitely more afraid of CG's + explosive than I was with AT4 + explosive
AT4 is incredibly easy to avoid, whereas CG's can be fired from across the map if you're tracered.
ITT: people blaming EA for DICE's work....:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
They are the master's of fucking up their own games.Blade4509 wrote:
No surprise. It's not EA would actually do things right or anything.genius_man16 wrote:
"RT @Demize99: AT4 was over effective in destroying armor when paired with explosive+. It was interrupting the balance of veh vs inf."
Wow, DICE is even more retarded than I thought.
As a tank driver I was infinitely more afraid of CG's + explosive than I was with AT4 + explosive
AT4 is incredibly easy to avoid, whereas CG's can be fired from across the map if you're tracered.
Oh look here comes our next game for you to buy so we can make 100million bucks, so were going to patch the one you all play now and make it a piece of shit so you'll go off and buy this new one...so we can do the same thing when we make our next game.
good....its EA's fault for picking them againFloppY_ wrote:
ITT: people blaming EA for DICE's work....:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
They are the master's of fucking up their own games.Blade4509 wrote:
No surprise. It's not EA would actually do things right or anything.
Oh look here comes our next game for you to buy so we can make 100million bucks, so were going to patch the one you all play now and make it a piece of shit so you'll go off and buy this new one...so we can do the same thing when we make our next game.
If you thought bf2 was the best game ever made when it was released and then watched it turn into a dumbed down piece of noob friendly pussy shit through those pathetic excuses they called patches then 1.5 would have been the last straw for you. Shit, 1.4 was when i quit that game.RTHKI wrote:
1.5 didnt keep me from playing BF2
>Implying EA is picking and choosing from everyone rather than just distributing whichever game they can profit from11 Bravo wrote:
good....its EA's fault for picking them againFloppY_ wrote:
ITT: people blaming EA for DICE's work....:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
They are the master's of fucking up their own games.
Oh look here comes our next game for you to buy so we can make 100million bucks, so were going to patch the one you all play now and make it a piece of shit so you'll go off and buy this new one...so we can do the same thing when we make our next game.
either way they chose to lay in bed with them so too badFloppY_ wrote:
>Implying EA is picking and choosing from everyone rather than just distributing whichever game they can profit from11 Bravo wrote:
good....its EA's fault for picking them againFloppY_ wrote:
ITT: people blaming EA for DICE's work...
Not to mention it has almost no splash so it's only use is on vehicles, you cant run around tubing everyone like with the CG.jsnipy wrote:
yeah seriously, you barely see people using it.its balanced because its real slow to reload and you have to have skill to guide itSpidery_Yoda wrote:
I have no idea why that guy is still in charge of weapon balance after what he did to the game in R7. He is ruining everything.genius_man16 wrote:
"RT @Demize99: AT4 was over effective in destroying armor when paired with explosive+. It was interrupting the balance of veh vs inf."
I played some original bf2 at the weekend and it was fun (despite lag) but not overly awesome. People remember things better than they actually were. Going from 1.0 bf2 to 1.41 over the weekend I could tell the differance but it wasn't collasal..:ronin:.|Patton wrote:
If you thought bf2 was the best game ever made when it was released and then watched it turn into a dumbed down piece of noob friendly pussy shit through those pathetic excuses they called patches then 1.5 would have been the last straw for you. Shit, 1.4 was when i quit that game.RTHKI wrote:
1.5 didnt keep me from playing BF2
That video is awesome!Rod Foxx wrote:
Hilarious revive invulnerability video demonstrating how broken it is. Supposedly a scrim of rival vs empire.
http://www.own3d.tv/video/29337/lol_fin1
if you are selling the game they need it to unlock the map packs. but if you activated it already I think they would have to purchase a new code after buying it from youjord wrote:
so i have a vip code on a little slip inside my game case, its for 360, is it worth anything or shall i not even bother listing in on its ebay page?
How the hell do they revive each other so fast? That's ridiculous.Rod Foxx wrote:
Hilarious revive invulnerability video demonstrating how broken it is. Supposedly a scrim of rival vs empire.
http://www.own3d.tv/video/29337/lol_fin1
Good thing I'm not the only one that sees that broken revive invuln. It's garbage.genius_man16 wrote:
How the hell do they revive each other so fast? That's ridiculous.Rod Foxx wrote:
Hilarious revive invulnerability video demonstrating how broken it is. Supposedly a scrim of rival vs empire.
http://www.own3d.tv/video/29337/lol_fin1
wtf cocks haven't see you in years good to see ya man // pilot from |DiedLaughing|DavidianCox wrote:
That video is awesome!Rod Foxx wrote:
Hilarious revive invulnerability video demonstrating how broken it is. Supposedly a scrim of rival vs empire.
http://www.own3d.tv/video/29337/lol_fin1
Pages: 1 … 175 176 177 178 179 … 227
