[Fallout: New Vegas] Official Thread

2010-06-16 17:55:28

#151

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

Spearhead wrote:
Gameplay -- Oblivion > Fallout 3

Story -- Fallout 3 > Oblivion

I always wondered why Fallout 3 was so... small compared to Oblivion. Not that it was small compared to any other game though.

because they shoveled it out.

And I'll go ahead and agree with you on both points there.

2010-06-16 17:59:27

#152

Bevo: Nah; +718|6735|Austin, Texas

If the combat system for bethesda games was improved, their games would be entirely kickass. I wasn't impressed by the combat of either oblivion or fallout, but the content of oblivion more than made up for it.

2010-06-16 18:00:12

#153

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

Bevo wrote:
If the combat system for bethesda games was improved, their games would be entirely kickass. I wasn't impressed by the combat of either oblivion or fallout, but the content of oblivion more than made up for it.

Oblivion may not have the best combat, but it's miles above Fallout 3's.

2010-06-17 06:51:54

#154

henno13: A generally unremarkable member; +230|6563|Belfast

http://gamevideos.1up.com/video/id/29981

2010-06-26 22:17:23

#155

RTHKI: mmmf mmmf mmmf; +1,741|6951|Oxferd Ohire

i wonder if there will be any references to the six string samurai, a movie. that movie was so funny. the goal was to get to lost vegas fyi

2010-07-18 16:11:17

#156

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6752|Long Island, New York

http://g4tv.com/videos/47451/Fallout-Ne … quality=hd

Preview from G4.

Updating OP atm.

Last edited by Poseidon (2010-07-18 16:11:36)

2010-07-18 16:18:23

#157

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6685

i wish i could get into games like this... but im too much of an fps purist... i find the combat asinine and dull...

oblivion, fallout -- hell even games like mass effect that are more about roleplay/story. i just don't 'get' it.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-18 16:26:48

#158

jord: Member; +2,382|6893|The North, beyond the wall.

I'm playing through mass effect 2 again and enjoyed fallout 3. I guess its about the choices and story rather than gameplay.

The only way I see it is I get on average under 10 hours of sp game time on an fps. Mass effect 2 has me at over 50 hours on sp, about 49 hours I enjoyed.

2010-07-18 16:28:06

#159

SamTheMan: +341|5356|Stoke, England

didnt know you played me2 jordo, you played 1 too? makes it so much better

2010-07-18 16:32:47

#160

jord: Member; +2,382|6893|The North, beyond the wall.

Nope just got me2 on 360 off a mate a few months ago, good shit.

2010-07-18 16:33:41

#161

SamTheMan: +341|5356|Stoke, England

sick, ye if youd of played 1 the choices you make in that effect shit in 2, pretty cool

2010-07-18 16:35:02

#162

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6685

i would get me/me2 for PC but methinks it would play like shit on mouse+keyboard.

and i sold my wireless xbox-pc controller ages ago when i stopped playing gta iv

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-18 16:40:47

#163

SamTheMan: +341|5356|Stoke, England

get them uzi, they play fine with mouse+kb

2010-07-18 16:45:03

#164

jord: Member; +2,382|6893|The North, beyond the wall.

Or get a console.

2010-07-18 16:52:19

#165

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6752|Long Island, New York

The fact that your choices from a game from 2007 could impact your gameplay from a game from 2010 was pretty fucking cool.

I really hope NV is more choice/moral based.

2010-07-18 17:53:24

#166

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6685

just bought me1+2... will maybe consider buying fallout 3 goty after.

also have the stalker games to play... missed out on a lot of single-player storylines.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-18 17:56:10

#167

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

Poseidon wrote:
The fact that your choices from a game from 2007 could impact your gameplay from a game from 2010 was pretty fucking cool.

I really hope NV is more choice/moral based.

I was more impressed to hear that mass effect was the first game to do that.

2010-07-18 18:03:19

#168

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6752|Long Island, New York

Uzique wrote:
just bought me1+2... will maybe consider buying fallout 3 goty after.

also have the stalker games to play... missed out on a lot of single-player storylines.

Definitely buy the GOTY. So worth the money. I know Miggle will tear me apart on TS for this, but I spent a good 100 hours on Fallout 3. 40 alone on the DLC.

2010-07-18 18:07:17

#169

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6685

as i said, though... the combat system just doesn't draw me in. there had better be some amazing storylines and a really compelling gameplay-experience to compensate for the utter-wank that is the F3 aiming-system / combat interaction. at the moment im struggling STALKER because there's no voice-acting, the writing is absolutely terrible and so none of the 'content' of the game really makes up for the pretty piss-poor shooting. plus the graphics are shit as well. disappointed with that one.

mass effect was an easier choice to buy because it's 3rd person and reminds me a bit of dead-space in terms of movement and gameplay. i can get along with that: it's not pretending to be a 'proper' shooter or 'action rpg' as such, so i'm not going to get bitched out at the lack of a brilliant top-notch combat system. fallout 3 and stalker's systems look pretty dire.

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-18 18:08:15

#170

Miggle: FUCK UBISOFT; +1,411|6956|FUCK UBISOFT

Uzique wrote:
as i said, though... the combat system just doesn't draw me in. there had better be some amazing storylines and a really compelling gameplay-experience to compensate for the utter-wank that is the F3 aiming-system / combat interaction. at the moment im struggling STALKER because there's no voice-acting, the writing is absolutely terrible and so none of the 'content' of the game really makes up for the pretty piss-poor shooting. plus the graphics are shit as well. disappointed with that one.

mass effect was an easier choice to buy because it's 3rd person and reminds me a bit of dead-space in terms of movement and gameplay. i can get along with that: it's not pretending to be a 'proper' shooter or 'action rpg' as such, so i'm not going to get bitched out at the lack of a brilliant top-notch combat system. fallout 3 and stalker's systems look pretty dire.

Fallout 3's combat is one of the worst in any game I've ever played.

2010-07-18 18:09:49

#171

Uzique: dasein.; +2,865|6685

whenever ive watched friends play it, it pretty much came across as a:

LOOK! HERE'S 100 DIFFERENT TYPES OF GIMMICK-DRIVEN WEAPONS - CLICK WHICH PART OF THE ENEMIES BODY YOU WANT TO SEE EXPLODING IN THE ANIMATION AND THEN LAUGH AT THE GUN'S 'FUNNY' FIRING!

over and over and over and over...

i'd rather play pokemon or final fantasy and run around in the long-grass all day

_{libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual}. _{http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/}

2010-07-18 18:15:34

#172

Poseidon: Fudgepack DeQueef; +3,253|6752|Long Island, New York

Uzique wrote:
as i said, though... the combat system just doesn't draw me in. there had better be some amazing storylines and a really compelling gameplay-experience to compensate for the utter-wank that is the F3 aiming-system / combat interaction. at the moment im struggling STALKER because there's no voice-acting, the writing is absolutely terrible and so none of the 'content' of the game really makes up for the pretty piss-poor shooting. plus the graphics are shit as well. disappointed with that one.

mass effect was an easier choice to buy because it's 3rd person and reminds me a bit of dead-space in terms of movement and gameplay. i can get along with that: it's not pretending to be a 'proper' shooter or 'action rpg' as such, so i'm not going to get bitched out at the lack of a brilliant top-notch combat system. fallout 3 and stalker's systems look pretty dire.

It's just "entertaining" I guess you could say. The atmosphere is what drew me in mostly, as with Red Dead Redemption.

Gameplay wise it's very soft, I'll admit.

2010-07-18 21:31:24

#173

firebolt5: Member; +114|6370

Or if you want to try something radically different try Jagged Alliance 2. If you do play the game, get ready for ragequiting in both vanilla and 1.13 of Jagged Alliance 2. The game is still fun though and there's cheats for the game.

2010-07-18 22:41:16

#174

Blade4509: Wrench turnin' fool; +202|5723|America

So do you have to play the expansion packs to understand the storyline in this game?

"Raise the flag high! Let the degenerates know who comes to claim their lives this day!"

2010-07-19 02:34:25

#175

Cybargs: Moderated; +2,285|6931

Blade4509 wrote:
So do you have to play the expansion packs to understand the storyline in this game?

Fallout doesn't really have a linear story except it's the apocalpytic wasteland, people are trying to survive, evil government before the war wants to regain control etc.

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

BF2S Forums [Fallout: New Vegas] Official Thread

Spearhead wrote:

Bevo wrote:

Poseidon wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Blade4509 wrote:

Board footer