BF2S Forums [Fallout: New Vegas] Official Thread

DefCon-17 wrote:

Hopefully it'll be fun this time.

If they give it more content than Fallout 3, and fix the combat, then it might actually be worth a purchase.

Miggle wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Hopefully it'll be fun this time.

If they give it more content than Fallout 3, and fix the combat, then it might actually be worth a purchase.

Yeah, as I said in another thread, the combat is what put me off.

jord wrote:

Miggles stamp of approval, something everyone, everywhere do not give a shit about.

Kind of like your posts?

Miggle wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Miggle wrote:

you of course would know so much about how unique fallout 3 is considering you've never played anything else on its engine which of course works the same way.

miggle fuck off, this flaming shit is getting old...

I just don't give a rats arse about medieval games, now get over it! I just said FO3 does mods different from regular steam games like Source, which has mods as either a seperate game or serverside...

Mods are quite abit different from other games on fallout3

This is blissfully factually inaccurate. Your ignorance and stupidity never cease to amaze me.

Mods tend to be handled differently on many engines, but Gamebryo is nothing new to steam and has no problems with it.

omfg, did you really fail to comprehend a typo that obvious?

stfu

DefCon-17 wrote:

Miggle wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Hopefully it'll be fun this time.

If they give it more content than Fallout 3, and fix the combat, then it might actually be worth a purchase.

Yeah, as I said in another thread, the combat is what put me off.

jord wrote:

Miggles stamp of approval, something everyone, everywhere do not give a shit about.

Kind of like your posts?

What's wrong with the combat?

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-06-10 11:53:52)

FloppY_ wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Miggle wrote:

If they give it more content than Fallout 3, and fix the combat, then it might actually be worth a purchase.

Yeah, as I said in another thread, the combat is what put me off.

jord wrote:

Miggles stamp of approval, something everyone, everywhere do not give a shit about.

Kind of like your posts?

What's wrong with the combat?

Vats was obnoxious, every time you tried to kill somebody with it you had to watch it in slow motion, often with the camera inside of some object making it impossible to see anything. It literally got tiresome after the first time. If you wanted to avoid vats, good luck, because even the most accurate guns have such immense deviation that hitting a target is more luck than aim, and to top it all off, training skills in weapons seems to do nothing about these issues.

FloppY_ wrote:

Miggle wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

miggle fuck off, this flaming shit is getting old...

I just don't give a rats arse about medieval games, now get over it! I just said FO3 does mods different from regular steam games like Source, which has mods as either a seperate game or serverside...

Mods are quite abit different from other games on fallout3

This is blissfully factually inaccurate. Your ignorance and stupidity never cease to amaze me.

Mods tend to be handled differently on many engines, but Gamebryo is nothing new to steam and has no problems with it.

omfg, did you really fail to comprehend a typo that obvious?

stfu

what typo? the lack of a space between Fallout and 3? the combination of a and bit? the way you spelled separate?

Or was it that you didn't compare it to source games in your first post, which was not only not obvious, but also would have been stupid. Source is a completely different engine. it handles mods differently. most engines do. I addressed this in my response. Gamebryo has been on steam several times before and had no issues. you're retarded.

Last edited by Miggle (2010-06-10 12:04:19)

DefCon-17 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

DefCon-17 wrote:

Miggle wrote:

If they give it more content than Fallout 3, and fix the combat, then it might actually be worth a purchase.

Yeah, as I said in another thread, the combat is what put me off.


Kind of like your posts?

What's wrong with the combat?

It was...clunky, for lack of a better description. Just wasn't fun.

VATS was pretty epic the first 10 times or so, but that wore pretty thin too after that.

I do agree that when you shoot someone in the forehead their face shouldn't come flying off separeted cleanly at the neck...
That is my main gripe with it tbh,,,

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

New trailer

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-20 … new/101172


While it's mostly combat, I get the sense that it will have much more memorable sequences in it than FO3 did. FO3's only truly memorable part was with Liberty Prime. It also looks like it's going to have a bit more humor. No surprising being that it's the Fallout 2 team (mostly) that's behind it. It also looks like they are trying to improve the combat, which is really good. FO3's combat wasn't it's highlight, but I don't think it was beyond salvaging.

I noticed a near-exact copy of a Barret .50 cal in there,, that's quite a bold thing considering the design philosophy....

Good to see an eyebot, that's a sign of the enclave beeing part of this

Last edited by FloppY_ (2010-06-12 10:48:32)

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

New trailer

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-20 … new/101172


While it's mostly combat, I get the sense that it will have much more memorable sequences in it than FO3 did. FO3's only truly memorable part was with Liberty Prime. It also looks like it's going to have a bit more humor. No surprising being that it's the Fallout 2 team (mostly) that's behind it. It also looks like they are trying to improve the combat, which is really good. FO3's combat wasn't it's highlight, but I don't think it was beyond salvaging.

Awesome trailer tbh

FloppY_ wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

seeing that kind of makes me want to play Fallout 3 again.

You've stopped?

lol. i got it when it came out but got rid of it Jan 09 for 50. and now i dont have a computer that can run it. used my desktop before but its aged a lot since then, the audio was fucked up on it anyway. laptop cant even run f.e.a.r. on high. .

and i dont want it on console

Last edited by RTHKI (2010-06-12 11:59:05)

FloppY_ wrote:

RTHKI wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

You've stopped?

lol. i got it when it came out but got rid of it Jan 09 for 50. and now i dont have a computer that can run it. used my desktop before but its aged a lot since then, the audio was fucked up on it anyway. laptop cant even run f.e.a.r. on high. .

and i dont want it on console

I feel sad for you :<

Get a new PC

oh i will..in 3 years. at that time i will go on a game buying spree, including FO3 and New Vegas.

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

New trailer

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-20 … new/101172


While it's mostly combat, I get the sense that it will have much more memorable sequences in it than FO3 did. FO3's only truly memorable part was with Liberty Prime. It also looks like it's going to have a bit more humor. No surprising being that it's the Fallout 2 team (mostly) that's behind it. It also looks like they are trying to improve the combat, which is really good. FO3's combat wasn't it's highlight, but I don't think it was beyond salvaging.

@1:45

Fallout: New Vegas dated. October 19, 2010 US, October 22nd Europe.

http://www.gametrailers.com/news/fallou … dated/2192

FloppY_ wrote:

Big McLargehuge wrote:

Fallout: New Vegas dated. October 19, 2010 US, October 22nd Europe.

http://www.gametrailers.com/news/fallou … dated/2192

Didn't we know this last week, when it was released on steam...

Steam only had the month of release, not the exact day.