Move looks just as fucking stupid as Natal. And you wanna talk about a Wii copy? There's your winner.
I used to own a power glove for the ninetendo
Tu Stultus Es
Of course it's not going to appeal to a mainstream 360 gamer, you're not gonna be playing MW2 with it, lol. It's supposed to help the 360 compete with the Wii for that interactive-type crap, but of course they're going to jack it off and market it as though it would appeal to mainstream gamers.Poseidon wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jm0KKa6w … embedded#!
I think the only way I can find this fun in college is if I'm ridiculously drunk. I really don't see how stuff like this is going to appeal to the mainstream 360 gamer (someone who likes GoW and Halo).
Last edited by _j5689_ (2010-06-05 10:45:48)
move looks like a wii controller that fucked a bop-itPoseidon wrote:
Move looks just as fucking stupid as Natal. And you wanna talk about a Wii copy? There's your winner.
Should've put "IT'S PARTY TIME" somewhere in itMiggle wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44874/projectnatal.gif
lol at appealing to halo fans, just put master chiefs face on it and theyll buy it is they can find the time inbetween creaming their pants
It has buttons and I think it will work better than wii especially if they have the right games for it, wii unfortunately can't have a proper fps game on its system.Poseidon wrote:
Move looks just as fucking stupid as Natal. And you wanna talk about a Wii copy? There's your winner.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
because it's a console. PS3 has the same problem.War Man wrote:
It has buttons and I think it will work better than wii especially if they have the right games for it, wii unfortunately can't have a proper fps game on its system.Poseidon wrote:
Move looks just as fucking stupid as Natal. And you wanna talk about a Wii copy? There's your winner.
What about Red Steel?War Man wrote:
It has buttons and I think it will work better than wii especially if they have the right games for it, wii unfortunately can't have a proper fps game on its system.Poseidon wrote:
Move looks just as fucking stupid as Natal. And you wanna talk about a Wii copy? There's your winner.
n64 graphics + shit controls really does it for me
Wii wannabe
Meh, the idea of motion control games is a good one.
Not everyone is you, there is room for different kinds of game play, kids enjoy it and its fun to fully participate instead of just clicking buttons.
That said, motion control should not consist of "flail as much as possible and the game will figure out something to do."
Not everyone is you, there is room for different kinds of game play, kids enjoy it and its fun to fully participate instead of just clicking buttons.
That said, motion control should not consist of "flail as much as possible and the game will figure out something to do."
All I wanna know is how I'm gonna be able to play Call on Duty 2 Modern Warfare with this. That's the only game I play and if it won't work with Natel I won't buy it.
Isn't the flailing about the equivalent of button mashing?VicktorVauhn wrote:
Meh, the idea of motion control games is a good one.
Not everyone is you, there is room for different kinds of game play, kids enjoy it and its fun to fully participate instead of just clicking buttons.
That said, motion control should not consist of "flail as much as possible and the game will figure out something to do."
Mashing buttons, and jumping up and down are about as different as can be....Canin wrote:
Isn't the flailing about the equivalent of button mashing?VicktorVauhn wrote:
Meh, the idea of motion control games is a good one.
Not everyone is you, there is room for different kinds of game play, kids enjoy it and its fun to fully participate instead of just clicking buttons.
That said, motion control should not consist of "flail as much as possible and the game will figure out something to do."
Is tapping your finger about the equivalent of doing jumping jacks?
Also notice
1.) I never said "Button mashing", or put it down in any way.
2.) I said said the flailing around doesn't count as motion control and is a shitty way to play games.
Meh, I was not being completely serious. Although I have seen people flail around as they mash buttons.VicktorVauhn wrote:
Mashing buttons, and jumping up and down are about as different as can be....Canin wrote:
Isn't the flailing about the equivalent of button mashing?VicktorVauhn wrote:
Meh, the idea of motion control games is a good one.
Not everyone is you, there is room for different kinds of game play, kids enjoy it and its fun to fully participate instead of just clicking buttons.
That said, motion control should not consist of "flail as much as possible and the game will figure out something to do."
Is tapping your finger about the equivalent of doing jumping jacks?
Also notice
1.) I never said "Button mashing", or put it down in any way.
2.) I said said the flailing around doesn't count as motion control and is a shitty way to play games.
wasn't trying to put words in your mouth, sorry.
So, why are they flailing in the first place? What game is it?
natal is not going to fly in my book
Not just fail. Facepalm fail.
psssssh, if you haven't figured out, the REAL objective of natal was to appeal to wii casualfags who wanted better graphix.
I like the motion control for certain applications. I just don't like playing the entire game with it exclusively (sorry, Galaxy).Trotskygrad wrote:
psssssh, if you haven't figured out, the REAL objective of natal was to appeal to wii casualfags who wanted better graphix.