Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6827|Texas - Bigger than France
I've always wondered if there was a magic bullet which explained why certain groups leaned one way over the other.  Specifically, what policies within the GOP or Dem parties make some of these folks gravitate toward their party of choice.

Any ideas?

http://people-press.org/commentary/?analysisid=95

The chart:
https://people-press.org/commentary/images/95-4.gif

well, try the link, sorry.

For instance, why are the jewish folks usually democrats? What policies?

I have a few ideas, and of course, some of the answers are that hard to come by.  But why the difference in party by sex?  race?  religion?

The differences:
Women more likely to be democrat
Black & Hispanic more likely to be democrat
65+ older more likely to be democrat
Lower education levels more likely to be democrat
Higher income levels more likely to be republican

Sure, there's some easy answers.  I'm looking for the harder ones.
ruisleipa
Member
+149|6507|teh FIN-land
Because groups tend to vote for parties whose policies are most likely to help them. Thus, since republicans tend to put in place laws that fuck over the poor while sucking off the rich, the latter are much more likely to vote for them than the former. Seem reasonable?
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5544|foggy bottom
instead of saying all that why not say

wealthy white people more likely to be republican, everyone else likely to be democrat

Last edited by eleven bravo (2010-05-18 14:02:28)

Tu Stultus Es
unnamednewbie13
Moderator
+2,056|7057|PNW

One head's on the left shoulder, one's on the right.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,743|7022|Cinncinatti

eleven bravo wrote:

instead of saying all that why not say

wealthy white people more likely to be republican, everyone else likely to be democrat
rednecks?
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5544|foggy bottom
white people and the wealthy
Tu Stultus Es
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,743|7022|Cinncinatti
what about those who are truly independent
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5544|foggy bottom

RTHKI wrote:

what about those who are truly independent
former republicans
Tu Stultus Es
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,743|7022|Cinncinatti
far left environmentalists. they always seem to be white
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5544|foggy bottom

RTHKI wrote:

far left environmentalists. they always seem to be white
i bet their parents were staunch conservatives
Tu Stultus Es
KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,982|6917|949

ruisleipa wrote:

Because groups tend to vote for parties whose policies are most likely to help them. Thus, since republicans tend to put in place laws that fuck over the poor while sucking off the rich, the latter are much more likely to vote for them than the former. Seem reasonable?
actually both parties put forth policies that filter money to the top.  Some are less abashed than others though.

But I think the OP is looking for specific policies.  "people vote for parties whose policies are most likely to help them" should be abridged to read "people vote for parties whose policies they think are most likely to help them."  But then, that statement is a DUH! that doesn't really need to be said, does it?
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6827|Texas - Bigger than France
Let me restate:
Policies and laws, not ideology.

Aka, if "fuck the poor" and "feed the rich" is the goal, what policies and laws support that?

According the the sample, most people over 65 years old support the democratic party.  But that's after amassing wealth.  Why the flip then?  What law/policy?
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,743|7022|Cinncinatti

Pug wrote:

Let me restate:
Policies and laws, not ideology.

Aka, if "fuck the poor" and "feed the rich" is the goal, what policies and laws support that?

According the the sample, most people over 65 years old support the democratic party.  But that's after amassing wealth.  Why the flip then?  What law/policy?
social security and medicare?
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5544|foggy bottom
replublicans want corporate welfare
democrats want social welfare
the republicans let the democrats become the party of civil rights.
Tu Stultus Es
Pug
UR father's brother's nephew's former roommate
+652|6827|Texas - Bigger than France
RTHKI:
supported by both parties, no?

Last edited by Pug (2010-05-18 14:14:52)

KEN-JENNINGS
I am all that is MOD!
+2,982|6917|949

Pug wrote:

Let me restate:
Policies and laws, not ideology.

Aka, if "fuck the poor" and "feed the rich" is the goal, what policies and laws support that?

According the the sample, most people over 65 years old support the democratic party.  But that's after amassing wealth.  Why the flip then?  What law/policy?
I think you are chasing after something that doesn't exist.  I really don't think the majority of people vote based on policy.  Certainly if a major bill comes up retooling Medicare you might see a shift in 65+ demographics during the period the bill is debated and voted on but I don't think that causes a serious shift in support for one party or the other.
cpt.fass1
The Cap'n Can Make it Hap'n
+329|6981|NJ
Honestly, the political parties really don't have too much to do with who's in them. That's why you see lots of words like FISCAL Democrat and blah blah.

It has to do with who's hiring. Many people will run with a party to win, even though they really don't have an affiliation with them. I know lots of Democrats who do volunteer work with the republican party and vice versa.

This is why no party actually preforms the way it's suppose to. We should have less debt and less taxation with Reps them with Dems, but when was the last time that happened?
pace51
Boom?
+194|5458|Markham, Ontario

eleven bravo wrote:

instead of saying all that why not say

wealthy white people more likely to be republican, everyone else likely to be democrat
SEREMAKER
BABYMAKIN EXPERT √
+2,187|6854|Mountains of NC

remember those 65+ are part of the 60's era .......... hippies - drug taking, war protesting .... dirty hippies
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/17445/carhartt.jpg
13rin
Member
+977|6764

eleven bravo wrote:

white people and the wealthy
You must explain Oprah to me then.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
RTHKI
mmmf mmmf mmmf
+1,743|7022|Cinncinatti

DBBrinson1 wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

white people and the wealthy
You must explain Oprah to me then.
and athletes..and a lot of actors and such seem to be. but even them dont make up a majority of wealthy most likely
https://i.imgur.com/tMvdWFG.png
eleven bravo
Member
+1,399|5544|foggy bottom

DBBrinson1 wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

white people and the wealthy
You must explain Oprah to me then.
celebrities are outliers
Tu Stultus Es
13rin
Member
+977|6764

eleven bravo wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

white people and the wealthy
You must explain Oprah to me then.
celebrities are outliers
heh...
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
Cybargs
Moderated
+2,285|7002

DBBrinson1 wrote:

eleven bravo wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

You must explain Oprah to me then.
celebrities are outliers
heh...
Business tax cuts. Higher ups in business tend to vote republican on free trade issues. Celebs are rich, not wealthy.

Edit: It all comes down to how and how much tax money is spent/collected.

Last edited by Cybargs (2010-05-18 19:50:06)

https://cache.www.gametracker.com/server_info/203.46.105.23:21300/b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard