BF2S Forums gotta love this "cop watchers"

lowing wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

Calling me a dumbass is not where you agree with me. That was just you acting like a kid. It was when you stated you troubleshoot, repair, and install. What I was saying you did all along. Only you innitially said I know fuck all about it. Then you say thats what you do.

And when you follow the FIM and can't solve the problem what do you do? You alter parts? Or do you report the issue, and get a response on what to do next? Because if you do any more then that, you better be more then a mechanic.

If you had said, we troubleshoot and repair systems, you would not be showing how little you know. You didn't say that. I did.

Mechanics in manufacturing companies install systems as well as troubleshoot and repair them. You also obviously have no idea what it takes to troubleshoot a system in order to find the faults, especially those that do not present itself readily.

Mechanics will ask other more experienced mechanics for help in solving problems, might even have to go back to the manufacture for a solution. A lot of times the manufacture will issue bulletins about known issues with a fix for them.

One thing is for sure, none of us has ever called a fuckin lawyer for a parts supplier to troubleshoot an aircraft.

Dilbert_X wrote:

lowing wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

Calling me a dumbass is not where you agree with me. That was just you acting like a kid. It was when you stated you troubleshoot, repair, and install. What I was saying you did all along. Only you innitially said I know fuck all about it. Then you say thats what you do.

And when you follow the FIM and can't solve the problem what do you do? You alter parts? Or do you report the issue, and get a response on what to do next? Because if you do any more then that, you better be more then a mechanic.

If you had said, we troubleshoot and repair systems, you would not be showing how little you know. You didn't say that. I did.

Mechanics in manufacturing companies install systems as well as troubleshoot and repair them. You also obviously have no idea what it takes to troubleshoot a system in order to find the faults, especially those that do not present itself readily.

Mechanics will ask other more experienced mechanics for help in solving problems, might even have to go back to the manufacture for a solution. A lot of times the manufacture will issue bulletins about known issues with a fix for them.

One thing is for sure, none of us has ever called a fuckin lawyer for a parts supplier to troubleshoot an aircraft.

If you're making any mods you'd better be an engineer.

nlsme1 wrote:

lowing wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

Calling me a dumbass is not where you agree with me. That was just you acting like a kid. It was when you stated you troubleshoot, repair, and install. What I was saying you did all along. Only you innitially said I know fuck all about it. Then you say thats what you do.

And when you follow the FIM and can't solve the problem what do you do? You alter parts? Or do you report the issue, and get a response on what to do next? Because if you do any more then that, you better be more then a mechanic.

If you had said, we troubleshoot and repair systems, you would not be showing how little you know. You didn't say that. I did.

Mechanics in manufacturing companies install systems as well as troubleshoot and repair them. You also obviously have no idea what it takes to troubleshoot a system in order to find the faults, especially those that do not present itself readily.

Mechanics will ask other more experienced mechanics for help in solving problems, might even have to go back to the manufacture for a solution. A lot of times the manufacture will issue bulletins about known issues with a fix for them.

One thing is for sure, none of us has ever called a fuckin lawyer for a parts supplier to troubleshoot an aircraft.

Your right I used differant wording. Still had the same meaning. You better believe lawyers were involved way before you came along to do your job. You know why? COSTS.
All in all, your a mechanic. Thats not an insult. Its a good job, with good pay and benefits. You probably make more then me. It is just a statement showing YOUR LIMITED EXPERIANCE. It was only stated to show you knew fuck all about what I was speaking of. COSTS.
If I am wrong, argue the fact. But, to assume mechanics know ALL the ins and outs in the industry is akin to saying Pep Boy's knows how GM/Ford/Chrysler operates.

lowing wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

lowing wrote:

If you had said, we troubleshoot and repair systems, you would not be showing how little you know. You didn't say that. I did.

Mechanics in manufacturing companies install systems as well as troubleshoot and repair them. You also obviously have no idea what it takes to troubleshoot a system in order to find the faults, especially those that do not present itself readily.

Mechanics will ask other more experienced mechanics for help in solving problems, might even have to go back to the manufacture for a solution. A lot of times the manufacture will issue bulletins about known issues with a fix for them.

One thing is for sure, none of us has ever called a fuckin lawyer for a parts supplier to troubleshoot an aircraft.

Your right I used differant wording. Still had the same meaning. You better believe lawyers were involved way before you came along to do your job. You know why? COSTS.
All in all, your a mechanic. Thats not an insult. Its a good job, with good pay and benefits. You probably make more then me. It is just a statement showing YOUR LIMITED EXPERIANCE. It was only stated to show you knew fuck all about what I was speaking of. COSTS.
If I am wrong, argue the fact. But, to assume mechanics know ALL the ins and outs in the industry is akin to saying Pep Boy's knows how GM/Ford/Chrysler operates.

Again you did not say as a lawyer, you know more about the costs of anything. you said you know more about aeronautics. You say this is the same thing, I disagree.

I do not take being called a mechanic as an insult, not at all, but for you to assume it is mindless work, and all we do is install bolts. you would be wrong, and THIS is what shows how little you know about aviation.

Yeah if you want to say I have limited expeirence sitting behind a desk signing contracts, fine you win. But do not tell me you think you know more about what it takes to be an aircraft mechanic than an aircraft mechanic.

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-05-14 07:34:38)

Dilbert_X wrote:

Mechanic is still a better job than wading through reams of incomprehensible gobbledegook and trying to make something useful out of it.

Wait, thats exactly what mechanics do.

PS I'd be a lot happier if someone connected to an airline didn't keep telling people to die in a fire.

nlsme1 wrote:

I mean to be insulting by correctly stating your job description?

I work for myself so I do do as I please on a daily basis. Some days I do do mindless mundane work. Some days I play golf with clients. Was not trying to insult you by arguing your job COULD be done by the millitary.

I tried to compliment your career. I am not unfair, but I am realistic. I don't try to read through people. I take their word as their meaning.

I have job interviews on a weekly basis. I have no pension, and debt. My job is not groundbreaking, nor do I know all there is to know about it. I learn every day. There is NO manufacturer to tell me how to do what I do. When I am stuck, "I"have to find a solution, if I can't, then "I" don't have a job. You get stuck, you call for help. My job is inherantly harder then yours (in certain aspects[not trying to belittle{I could go on and on about the great career choice you have made, give you my word there}]), yet the millitary still finds a way to employ thousands of people that do the exact same thing I do. They could do it in your field as well.

Last edited by lowing (2010-05-14 08:09:58)

nlsme1 wrote:

lowing wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

I mean to be insulting by correctly stating your job description?

I work for myself so I do do as I please on a daily basis. Some days I do do mindless mundane work. Some days I play golf with clients. Was not trying to insult you by arguing your job COULD be done by the millitary.

I tried to compliment your career. I am not unfair, but I am realistic. I don't try to read through people. I take their word as their meaning.

I have job interviews on a weekly basis. I have no pension, and debt. My job is not groundbreaking, nor do I know all there is to know about it. I learn every day. There is NO manufacturer to tell me how to do what I do. When I am stuck, "I"have to find a solution, if I can't, then "I" don't have a job. You get stuck, you call for help. My job is inherantly harder then yours (in certain aspects[not trying to belittle{I could go on and on about the great career choice you have made, give you my word there}]), yet the millitary still finds a way to employ thousands of people that do the exact same thing I do. They could do it in your field as well.

anyone can be trained to do what you or I do, the difference is, they are not. this included the military.

Now can we please get back to the OP?

Stated that earlier, was immediatly called an asshat.

As for the OP: If they succeed in catching a criminal act by a cop, they are in fact catching a criminal. Just because they see potential for abuse, and this is the only way they can think of to stop it, you call them idiots. Maybe, you could come up with an alternative method.

lowing wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

lowing wrote:

anyone can be trained to do what you or I do, the difference is, they are not. this included the military.

Now can we please get back to the OP?

Stated that earlier, was immediately called an ass hat.

As for the OP: If they succeed in catching a criminal act by a cop, they are in fact catching a criminal. Just because they see potential for abuse, and this is the only way they can think of to stop it, you call them idiots. Maybe, you could come up with an alternative method.

Most of us are not followed around being filmed in case we fuck up. No one I know would like it or put up with it, I doubt it is something you would endorse for yourself. Cops shouldn't be expected to put up with it either.

11 Bravo wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Some people abuse their powers lowing, even cops ... if there was no dirty cops there wouldn't be cop watchers either ...

why does it stop at cops is my question.

11 Bravo wrote:

nlsme1 wrote:

11 Bravo wrote:

why does it stop at cops is my question.

It doesn't.

sure does.  nobody films doctors...and they kill way more people than cops.