| Far Left | 9% | 9% - 6 | ||||
| Left | 7% | 7% - 5 | ||||
| Moderate Left | 19% | 19% - 12 | ||||
| Center (more or less) | 26% | 26% - 17 | ||||
| Moderate Right | 9% | 9% - 6 | ||||
| Right | 19% | 19% - 12 | ||||
| Far Right | 7% | 7% - 5 | ||||
| Total: 63 | ||||||
And as mentioned before, poll option terminology is up for individual interpretation and description in a subsequent post, since not everybody's ideas of left and right are the same.Varegg wrote:
@lowing: To keep discussing this topic is a lost case for you ... what should be important to you is your opinion and not what terminology it belongs to. I applaud you for not loosing your temper in this thread.
Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2010-05-03 02:53:26)
Talk about being disingenuous with political language. Every time I see the word "fascism" used in this way it makes me want to puke because it's so plainly obvious that there is no meaning other than "I don't like it" ascribed to the word.lowing wrote:
The Tea Party is a a reference to the Boston Tead Party, an anti-tax action.Dilbert_X wrote:
You mean Bush, Cheney Rumsfeld have so thoroughly and permanently screwed the meaning of 'conservative' that real conservatives now have to call themsleves the 'Tea Party'?lowing wrote:
liberal and conservative works just fine. No complaints from the conservative camp, of course the conservative label has not done itself in quite like the those that tote the liberal banner.
They are against the radicalism and fascism of the Obama administration. It has absolutely nothing to do with Bush Cheney or Rumsfeld..It is not an attempt to invent a new political affiliation.
Don't insult people you don't know and it isn't an issue.Varegg wrote:
@Certain moderator: We simply don't tell our members to fuck off.
Don't try that pshyco shit on me douchebagFlaming_Maniac wrote:
Don't insult people you don't know and it isn't an issue.Varegg wrote:
@Certain moderator: We simply don't tell our members to fuck off.
libel -
–noun
1.
Law.
a.
defamation by written or printed words, pictures, or in any form other than by spoken words or gestures.
b.
the act or crime of publishing it.
c.
a formal written declaration or statement, as one containing the allegations of a plaintiff or the grounds of a charge.
2.
anything that is defamatory or that maliciously or damagingly misrepresents.
"just ignore him"Varegg wrote:
@Certain moderator: We simply don't tell our members to fuck off.
in a thread like this? bet your ass. now, if you go back to that africa thread that gs bumped, you will see at one time i cared. but, that got chipped away over the years by this place...so yes. that goes for a lot of people tbh.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
See this is why you can't comprehend how to deal with personal attacks. You probably would have made a one line post about bleach consumption and ignored any of the other points.
Last edited by 11 Bravo (2010-05-03 07:31:34)
you really really need to look up the term fascism. I mean if you all want to go by strick definitions of shit now, then lets.ruisleipa wrote:
Obama's administration isn't fascist ffs. What a fucking stupid thing to say.lowing wrote:
They are against the radicalism and fascism of the Obama administration. It has absolutely nothing to do with Bush Cheney or Rumsfeld
but radicalism...ooooooh. something else to be scared about. Obviously radicaism is bad cos what we need is more of the same shit you had for the last 8 years prior to Obama.
As for your last sentence quoted above LOOOL noooo of course not hahahahaaahaha. Sucker.
because it is an action, a protest, not a philosophy.Dilbert_X wrote:
I know what it is, why not call themselves conservatives?lowing wrote:
The Tea Party is a a reference to the Boston Tead Party, an anti-tax action.Dilbert_X wrote:
You mean Bush, Cheney Rumsfeld have so thoroughly and permanently screwed the meaning of 'conservative' that real conservatives now have to call themsleves the 'Tea Party'?
They are against the radicalism and fascism of the Obama administration. It has absolutely nothing to do with Bush Cheney or Rumsfeld..It is not an attempt to invent a new political affiliation.
no actually, there is a meaning, and as shown Obama flirts with it rather closely if not completelySpark wrote:
Talk about being disingenuous with political language. Every time I see the word "fascism" used in this way it makes me want to puke because it's so plainly obvious that there is no meaning other than "I don't like it" ascribed to the word.lowing wrote:
The Tea Party is a a reference to the Boston Tead Party, an anti-tax action.Dilbert_X wrote:
You mean Bush, Cheney Rumsfeld have so thoroughly and permanently screwed the meaning of 'conservative' that real conservatives now have to call themsleves the 'Tea Party'?
They are against the radicalism and fascism of the Obama administration. It has absolutely nothing to do with Bush Cheney or Rumsfeld..It is not an attempt to invent a new political affiliation.
Is there any way you could possibly read the definition and then deny what Obama has done is doing or is trying to do? If so, do it.Uzique wrote:
lowing trying to define obama's administration as fascist is... tenuous, at best.
I suspect you really are serious in your vai attempt to 'ramrod' something you don't like into a term normally reserved for the worst evildoers on our planet, sadly. If you really equate Obama with fascism, it's just sad. Sad sad sad.lowing wrote:
now lets see, a govt. having complete power, ( all democrat control which he has used to ram rod his programs.)
forcibly suppressing oppostion and criticism ( a proponent of the fairness doctrine ) check.
regimenting all industry and commerce ( now auto and health care industries are govt controlled for starters, he also decided to take control over how much a private citizen can make).
emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism ( Hmmmm Henry Gates Jr. the nutty proffessor " the ( white) police acted stupidly" and the ft hood shooter " lets not jump to any conclusions"
wow, these definitions sure are interchangable to the previous administration.lowing wrote:
fas·cism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ Show Spelled[fash-iz-uhm] Show IPA
–noun
1.(sometimes initial capital letter) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
now lets see, a govt. having complete power, ( all republicans have control which he has used to ram rod his programs.)
forcibly suppressing oppostion and criticism ( a proponent of USAPATRIOTACT) check.
regimenting all industry and commerce ( the original bailout as well as the outsourcing of vital intelligence services to cronies with private contracting corporations).
emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism ( "god wants me to conquer iraq....orders for fallujah "kill everybody")
http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/a … rcID=44588 . There is a lot he hasn't done...................yetUzique wrote:
he hasn't silenced the opposition party, for one.
show me a fascist dictator in the last century that has allowed an opposition party to freely operate above-ground and in public
now this is good coming from one of those that has redefined racism.eleven bravo wrote:
why do y ou fuckers even bother. lowing goes by his own definitions of words