Last edited by -Sh1fty- (2010-04-27 05:16:11)
Non offence taken, since I'm not trying to be funny.seymorebutts443 wrote:
he's funnier than you will ever be.
Last edited by Stubbee (2010-04-28 06:40:52)
thats a plane.pace51 wrote:
Name this... Shouldn't be to hard.
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/mig-28_3.jpg
As a bonus, also name the famous movie it was featured in and what it was called in that movie.
Its a sarcasm.baggs wrote:
thats a plane.pace51 wrote:
Name this... Shouldn't be to hard.
http://static.bf2s.com/files/user/52201/mig-28_3.jpg
As a bonus, also name the famous movie it was featured in and what it was called in that movie.
shit-wagon-Sh1fty- wrote:
It's not even a mig. It's an F5 or F6 or something that they painted with MIG colors. Also, Top Gun is worse than Baggs and his shit-wagon of friends.
Yes. they took a northrop Tiger II, painted it black, and called it a mig-28. It doesn't even look like or handle like any mig other than the mig-21, and you don't need something like a tomcat to smash a mig-21. Any old phantom will do.
not in close air combat, mig has far superior maneurabilitypace51 wrote:
and you don't need something like a tomcat to smash a mig-21. Any old phantom will do.
Yeah, but if the AIM-7 doen't malfunction, smash the mig from range. If not, evade the migs, because they run out of fuel quick. Then attack them on their way home.Longbow wrote:
not in close air combat, mig has far superior maneurabilitypace51 wrote:
and you don't need something like a tomcat to smash a mig-21. Any old phantom will do.
Take that back you prick, or else.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Also, Top Gun is worse than Baggs and his shit-wagon of friends.
Or else what? You're going to make a retarded insulting post about what a miserable Swiss-USMC-fan-boi I am and how I'm such a naive little bastard?The Sheriff wrote:
Take that back you prick, or else.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Also, Top Gun is worse than Baggs and his shit-wagon of friends.
Actually no, If you say Top Gun is rubbish/lame/whatever, everyone on here knows your opinion is flawed, and thus will think the opposite of what you say. So yeah, carry on sharing your opinion, and I'll join the rest of the forum in disregarding it completely.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Or else what? You're going to make a retarded insulting post about what a miserable Swiss-USMC-fan-boi I am and how I'm such a naive little bastard?The Sheriff wrote:
Take that back you prick, or else.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Also, Top Gun is worse than Baggs and his shit-wagon of friends.
21's can operate from field airfields, so range factor isn't an issue. They can easily fly close to combat zone, land, refuel and join the fight.pace51 wrote:
Yeah, but if the AIM-7 doen't malfunction, smash the mig from range. If not, evade the migs, because they run out of fuel quick. Then attack them on their way home.
but Top Gun is some stupid 80s macho homosexual American air force love-in pile of shite.The Sheriff wrote:
Actually no, If you say Top Gun is rubbish/lame/whatever, everyone on here knows your opinion is flawed, and thus will think the opposite of what you say.
that we already know, i'm sure we'll think of something else to insult you with.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Or else what? You're going to make a retarded insulting post about what a miserable Swiss-USMC-fan-boi I am and how I'm such a naive little bastard?The Sheriff wrote:
Take that back you prick, or else.-Sh1fty- wrote:
Also, Top Gun is worse than Baggs and his shit-wagon of friends.
it's more nostalgic than anything, it came from an era of fascination for many of the members at bf2s. it's a great film, not the greatest, but it's a great film.ruisleipa wrote:
but Top Gun is some stupid 80s macho homosexual American air force love-in pile of shite.The Sheriff wrote:
Actually no, If you say Top Gun is rubbish/lame/whatever, everyone on here knows your opinion is flawed, and thus will think the opposite of what you say.
It's an American NAVY homosexual-macho aviation love-in pile of shit, but, other than that, I'd agree with your assessment.ruisleipa wrote:
but Top Gun is some stupid 80s macho homosexual American air force love-in pile of shite.
Last edited by rdx-fx (2010-04-30 02:08:23)
Yes, but they have to return early, anyways. So, wait, chase, smash.Longbow wrote:
21's can operate from field airfields, so range factor isn't an issue. They can easily fly close to combat zone, land, refuel and join the fight.pace51 wrote:
Yeah, but if the AIM-7 doen't malfunction, smash the mig from range. If not, evade the migs, because they run out of fuel quick. Then attack them on their way home.
