Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5987|College Park, MD
http://www.cars.com/go/advice/Story.jsp … amMade0709

Cars.com's American-Made Index rates vehicles built and bought in the U.S. Factors include sales, where the car's parts are made and whether the car is assembled in the U.S. Models that have been discontinued are disqualified, as are those with a domestic-parts content rating below 75 percent.
Half of the top 10 list is comprised of so-called "foreign" cars. I'm pretty sure not a single Chrysler vehicle is up there. Oops.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6906|London, England
buying american makes american CEO's rich, buying japanese makes japanese CEO's rich....the tax sorts itself out in benefit of the companies home country, eventually. Yeah the japanese company might invest alot in the US and create jobs and such, but most of the money is still heading towards japan. Or the reverse example would be even if american companies outsource around the world, most of the money is still coming into the US because it's all theirs

why do you think the US wants mcdonalds and pizza hut in all the countries and always wants to open new markets sometimes by force if necessary, it all still makes them rich because they're still american companies, open the market so your companies can flood in and you rake in the extra tax money, easy

as loads of US companies set up shop in iraq, probably make back all the money lost in no time...

That's how I've always seen it...
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5987|College Park, MD
Eh, a rich CEO would probably put his earnings into investments, not into products.
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX
It used to be the case that Swedish made Volvos had as much British content as most British cars, so qualified for tax concessions when bought by diplomatic and armed forces personnel stationed abroad.
This was ~20 years ago but still.
Fuck Israel
mtb0minime
minimember
+2,418|6940

It's news that cars are mixed-and-matched parts from various manufacturers?
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

Kmarion wrote:

Hurricane2k9 wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Why does every car produced for the American market seem to be shit? Ford make great cars in Europe; wank in the US. Toyota make great cars everywhere else in the world, wank in the US. I mean, how fucking shit does that Lexus look?
Ford's latest cars in the US are actually really good. The Ford Fusion has received many awards. The Ford Flex has great crash ratings. All the "lawl Amerikkkan cars suck" stuff is kind of in the past... I mean I don't know about GM and Chrysler cars, but Ford's latest offerings have been very good.

The problem I have with people saying "buy American" in regards to cars is that half the time these cars are built in Mexico.
And.. loads of "foreign" cars are manufactured here, in the states. .. including some Toyota's.
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=136758
They told me that a good portion of Toyota's were American made almost 20 years ago. When I shopped for my first car.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

Mekstizzle wrote:

why do you think the US wants mcdonalds and pizza hut in all the countries and always wants to open new markets sometimes by force if necessary,.
lol.. do they make you eat there to?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
mikkel
Member
+383|6887

Mekstizzle wrote:

buying american makes american CEO's rich, buying japanese makes japanese CEO's rich....the tax sorts itself out in benefit of the companies home country, eventually. Yeah the japanese company might invest alot in the US and create jobs and such, but most of the money is still heading towards japan.
That would make sense if at least half of the sale price was pre-tax income for the car maker. The pre-tax income is closer to 15%. If 80% of the materials and labour are American, then 60% of the sale price of a car ends up with American workers and businesses, and if the manufacturing facilities are located in the U.S., the U.S. subsidiary likely pays substantial taxes to the state in which they are located.

I'm not an expert on this, but it seems like a Japanese car made with 80% American parts and labour brings more money to the country than an American car made with 50% American parts and labour in a plant in Mexico.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

Agree^. .. and if a three dozen Japanese execs get rich while employing 100k American workers, well that's not too bad.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX
Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
Fuck Israel
Hurricane2k9
Pendulous Sweaty Balls
+1,538|5987|College Park, MD

Dilbert_X wrote:

Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
No. 1 in killing people with cars that decide to drive themselves amirite
https://static.bf2s.com/files/user/36793/marylandsig.jpg
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6691|North Carolina
Screw Toyota...   Mazda FTW
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX
Mazda and Subaru I like, Toyota is cut down to a price.
Fuck Israel
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

Dilbert_X wrote:

Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
GM makes quite a few relatively fuel efficient cars. In fact on average Chevrolet cars are more fuel efficient than Toyota.

https://i41.tinypic.com/350umwk.jpg
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX
I'd have to check but I'm pretty sure that in terms of CAFE standards, which covers cars and trucks, Toyota have a better rating and have had historically, so they're well in credit.
Fuck Israel
mikkel
Member
+383|6887

Kmarion wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
GM makes quite a few relatively fuel efficient cars. In fact on average Chevrolet cars are more fuel efficient than Toyota.

http://i41.tinypic.com/350umwk.jpg
To be fair, as far as I know, SUVs and other vehicle classes that are low mileage by nature make up a much bigger part of Toyota's lineup than they do of Chevrolet's. I'm assuming that your list draws on all vehicles in the manufacturers U.S. lineup, which doesn't really give an accurate apples-to-apples comparison.

Last edited by mikkel (2010-04-28 17:42:07)

Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

mikkel wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
GM makes quite a few relatively fuel efficient cars. In fact on average Chevrolet cars are more fuel efficient than Toyota.

http://i41.tinypic.com/350umwk.jpg
To be fair, as far as I know, SUVs and other vehicle classes that are low mileage by nature make up a much bigger part of Toyota's lineup than they do of Chevrolet's. I'm assuming that your list draws on all vehicles in the manufacturers U.S. lineup, which doesn't really give an accurate apples-to-apples comparison.
Does it? I've never heard that. Apparently Toyota doesn't give you as many options. Chevy also makes plenty of SUV's. .. and if most Chevy vehicles aren't SUV's isn't that a good thing?

Really it doesn't matter. No longer can it be said that American car manufacturers aren't at least trying to sell fuel efficiency. That's the point here.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

Kmarion wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
GM makes quite a few relatively fuel efficient cars. In fact on average Chevrolet cars are more fuel efficient than Toyota.

http://i41.tinypic.com/350umwk.jpg
How old is that pic? Pontiac no longer exists.

Edit - Neither does Saturn.

Last edited by JohnG@lt (2010-04-28 18:58:15)

"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,816|6391|eXtreme to the maX
CAFE changes enacted by the 110th Congress (The Energy Independence and Security Act P.L. 110-140, H.R. 6), instructed NHTSA to establish a credit trading and transferring scheme to allow manufacturers to transfer credits between categories, as well as sell them to other manufacturers or non-manufacturers. In addition, the period over which credits could be carried forward was extended from three years to five. Traded or transferred credits may not be used to meet the minimum standard in the domestic passenger car fleet, however they may be used to meet the `attribute standard'. This latter allowance has drawn criticism from the UAW which fears it will lead manufacturers to increase the importation of small cars to offset shortfalls in the domestic market.

These new flexibilities were implemented by regulation on March 23, 2009 in the Final Rule for 2011 Model Year Passenger Cars and Light Trucks.

Calculations using official CAFE data, and the newly proposed credit trading flexibility contained in the September 28, 2009 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking show that ninety-eight percent of the benefit derived from just the cross fleet credit trading provision flows to Toyota. According to these calculations 75% of the benefit from the two new CAFE credit trading provisions, cross fleet trading and 5-year carry-forward, falls to foreign manufacturers. Toyota can use the provision to avoid or reduce compliance on average by 0.69 mpg per year through 2020,

The estimated value of the CAFE exemption gained by Toyota is $2.5 billion; Honda’s benefit is worth $0.8 billion, and Nissan’s benefit is valued at $0.9 billion in reduced CAFE compliance costs. Foreign companies gained $5.5 billion in benefits compared with the $1.8 billion that went to the Detroit Three.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_ … el_Economy

Being smart is worth $2.5bn to Toyota, and they'll continue to benefit until 2020 at least, neat eh?

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2010-04-28 19:04:46)

Fuck Israel
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

JohnG@lt wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

Toyota are pretty smart, they're 5-10 years ahead of the curve instead of 5-10 behind like GM.

They have huge fuel efficiency credits in the bank, and when the inevitable trend back to 'Buy American' happens they can say 'Toyota No. 1!' with a straight face.
GM makes quite a few relatively fuel efficient cars. In fact on average Chevrolet cars are more fuel efficient than Toyota.

http://i41.tinypic.com/350umwk.jpg
How old is that pic? Pontiac no longer exists.

Edit - Neither does Saturn.
shoulda posted the link .. my guess, with the latest trends, GM prolly moved up even more.

Lemme check my history to find it.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6886|132 and Bush

Xbone Stormsurgezz
mikkel
Member
+383|6887

Kmarion wrote:

mikkel wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

GM makes quite a few relatively fuel efficient cars. In fact on average Chevrolet cars are more fuel efficient than Toyota.

http://i41.tinypic.com/350umwk.jpg
To be fair, as far as I know, SUVs and other vehicle classes that are low mileage by nature make up a much bigger part of Toyota's lineup than they do of Chevrolet's. I'm assuming that your list draws on all vehicles in the manufacturers U.S. lineup, which doesn't really give an accurate apples-to-apples comparison.
Does it? I've never heard that. Apparently Toyota doesn't give you as many options. Chevy also makes plenty of SUV's. .. and if most Chevy vehicles aren't SUV's isn't that a good thing?

Really it doesn't matter. No longer can it be said that American car manufacturers aren't at least trying to sell fuel efficiency. That's the point here.
You're absolutely right that it would be wrong to call American car manufacturers out on fuel efficiency in the American market. I went through the vehicles in the lineups on the websites of the respective companies, omitting hybrids and the Corvette (both to the benefit of Chevrolet), and the numbers came out pretty interesting. The average combined MPG for Toyota vehicles is 28.5 for cars, 20.7 for SUVs, and 20 for trucks, compared to Chevrolet's 27.4 for cars, 22 for SUVs, and 19.3 for trucks. Separated by category, the numbers do favour Toyota very slightly, but it's definitely fair to say that the two are pretty even.

Last edited by mikkel (2010-04-28 20:41:19)

Jay
Bork! Bork! Bork!
+2,006|5643|London, England

mikkel wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

mikkel wrote:


To be fair, as far as I know, SUVs and other vehicle classes that are low mileage by nature make up a much bigger part of Toyota's lineup than they do of Chevrolet's. I'm assuming that your list draws on all vehicles in the manufacturers U.S. lineup, which doesn't really give an accurate apples-to-apples comparison.
Does it? I've never heard that. Apparently Toyota doesn't give you as many options. Chevy also makes plenty of SUV's. .. and if most Chevy vehicles aren't SUV's isn't that a good thing?

Really it doesn't matter. No longer can it be said that American car manufacturers aren't at least trying to sell fuel efficiency. That's the point here.
You're absolutely right that it would be wrong to call American car manufacturers out on fuel efficiency in the American market. Interestingly, I went through the vehicles in the lineups on the websites of the respective companies. Omitting hybrids and the Corvette (both to the benefit of Chevrolet), the numbers came out pretty interesting. The average combined MPG for Toyota vehicles is 28.5 for cars, 20.7 for SUVs, and 20 for trucks, compared to Chevrolet's 27.4 for cars, 22 for SUVs, and 19.3 for trucks. Separated by category, the numbers do favour Toyota very slightly, but it's definitely fair to say that the two are pretty even.
Now, conduct a survey on how many issues car owners had with their Chevy right around the 100,000 mile mark compared to Toyota drivers. My Camaro had so many niggling little problems that I eventually just dumped it in a parking lot and let them tow it away.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
mikkel
Member
+383|6887

JohnG@lt wrote:

mikkel wrote:

Kmarion wrote:


Does it? I've never heard that. Apparently Toyota doesn't give you as many options. Chevy also makes plenty of SUV's. .. and if most Chevy vehicles aren't SUV's isn't that a good thing?

Really it doesn't matter. No longer can it be said that American car manufacturers aren't at least trying to sell fuel efficiency. That's the point here.
You're absolutely right that it would be wrong to call American car manufacturers out on fuel efficiency in the American market. Interestingly, I went through the vehicles in the lineups on the websites of the respective companies. Omitting hybrids and the Corvette (both to the benefit of Chevrolet), the numbers came out pretty interesting. The average combined MPG for Toyota vehicles is 28.5 for cars, 20.7 for SUVs, and 20 for trucks, compared to Chevrolet's 27.4 for cars, 22 for SUVs, and 19.3 for trucks. Separated by category, the numbers do favour Toyota very slightly, but it's definitely fair to say that the two are pretty even.
Now, conduct a survey on how many issues car owners had with their Chevy right around the 100,000 mile mark compared to Toyota drivers. My Camaro had so many niggling little problems that I eventually just dumped it in a parking lot and let them tow it away.
Yeah, wear and tear affects Chevrolets way more than Toyotas. To reach 100,000 miles in a Toyota, all you have to do is start the engine and floor the gas for a few seconds. The car does the rest of the work by itself after that.









*rimshot*
CosmoKramer
CC you in October
+131|6904|Medford, WI

JohnG@lt wrote:

mikkel wrote:

Kmarion wrote:


Does it? I've never heard that. Apparently Toyota doesn't give you as many options. Chevy also makes plenty of SUV's. .. and if most Chevy vehicles aren't SUV's isn't that a good thing?

Really it doesn't matter. No longer can it be said that American car manufacturers aren't at least trying to sell fuel efficiency. That's the point here.
You're absolutely right that it would be wrong to call American car manufacturers out on fuel efficiency in the American market. Interestingly, I went through the vehicles in the lineups on the websites of the respective companies. Omitting hybrids and the Corvette (both to the benefit of Chevrolet), the numbers came out pretty interesting. The average combined MPG for Toyota vehicles is 28.5 for cars, 20.7 for SUVs, and 20 for trucks, compared to Chevrolet's 27.4 for cars, 22 for SUVs, and 19.3 for trucks. Separated by category, the numbers do favour Toyota very slightly, but it's definitely fair to say that the two are pretty even.
Now, conduct a survey on how many issues car owners had with their Chevy right around the 100,000 mile mark compared to Toyota drivers. My Camaro had so many niggling little problems that I eventually just dumped it in a parking lot and let them tow it away.
we've had a corolla for 6 years and camry for 1 year now, barely any problems with them at all, corolla is around `75,000 mile

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard