BF2S Forums [Battlefield: Bad Company 2] Official Thread

It takes team work to win as defender.  It only takes two players to win as attacker.

Sorry guys I posted it while half asleep.  I expect you guys to get it.  Its a screenshot from my next montage.

There's all kinds of places where you can glitch into walls in this game. luckily DICE had the common sense to make it impossible to shoot out walls instead of trying to fix the thousands of places where you can do it a la BF2

HARDCORE IS FOR PROS BRAH
goddamn caps filter. every time.

Last edited by Lucien (2010-04-16 11:28:22)

Hardcore is horrible in this game. It's just too hard to stay alive in this game, the situational awareness fucking sucks in this game, I always know where people are in CoD games and previous BF games. I don't know what it is about this game, maybe the FOV, or the sound, but something sucks where I can't kick ass.

You really need a squad to watch all sectors, thank God at least that's a positive thing I can get from this, except I can never play with somebody who uses teamwork.

Ilocano wrote:

It takes team work to win as defender.  It only takes two players to win as attacker.

Many defenders make the mistake to go in attack mode looking for enemies.

Idiots

FloppY_ wrote:

Chou wrote:

Ilocano wrote:

It takes team work to win as defender.  It only takes two players to win as attacker.

Many defenders make the mistake to go in attack mode looking for enemies.

Idiots

And most attackers don't realise that engineer rocket launchers do a great amount of damage to M-COMs

Idiots

Shame you can't plant tracers on them.

-Sh1fty- wrote:

Hardcore is horrible in this game. It's just too hard to stay alive in this game, the situational awareness fucking sucks in this game, I always know where people are in CoD games and previous BF games. I don't know what it is about this game, maybe the FOV, or the sound, but something sucks where I can't kick ass.

suck less

Sisco10 wrote:

FloppY_ wrote:

Trotskygrad wrote:

Shame you can't plant tracers on them.

You don't need to.... If every engineer in the game fired a few rockets at an M-COM each round, Attackers would win 100% of the time...

TBH, I didn´t realise this. Is there even the damage info, aka blinking MCOM marker when you hit it with rockets? I can´t remember...

Yeah it blinks. Yesterday I was on Islas Innocentes and two guys fired rockets at our m-coms. Needless to say they got an m-com every 2 minutes or so.

Sisco10 wrote:

-Sh1fty- wrote:

Sisco10 wrote:

TBH, I didn´t realise this. Is there even the damage info, aka blinking MCOM marker when you hit it with rockets? I can´t remember...

Yeah it blinks. Yesterday I was on Islas Innocentes and two guys fired rockets at our m-coms. Needless to say they got an m-com every 2 minutes or so.

Need to try that



    *  You may post in 25 seconds

Use the AT4 since the M-COM takes damage as a vehicle...
If you use the "explosive damage" perk you get a +50 M-COM damage point with every rocket

-Sh1fty- wrote:

The AT4 leaves you much too exposed to enemy fire, even if you duck and guide the rocket using the m-com 3d marker. I use the RPG-7, it's the 2nd most powerful and the sights are much better for distance judging, because of the markers it was.

Joined an Islas Innocentes server to quickly test each rocket launcher. Had 15 tickets left and I grabbed an RPG-7 and took out the m-com with 3 tickets left. Took every rocket though.

Protip: Fire AT4, aimed at Mcom -> Unscope -> hide

Same results as the RPG7, without having to judge the angle

-Sh1fty- wrote:

So the AT4 doesn't guide anymore once you unscope?

Not according to my experiences with it...