well this is a debated subject and i personally think they should be allowed to adopt. there are children that are still without homes and if a couple can provide a family for them, why not?
thoughts?
thoughts?
Poll
should gay couples be allowed to adopt?
| yes | 86% | 86% - 37 | ||||
| no | 13% | 13% - 6 | ||||
| Total: 43 | ||||||
yes couples should be allowed to adopt gay babies i dont see whats wrong with that but its pretty racist and they make just as good kids as any straight kids but no bisexual kids they are the worst cant make up their damn minds i also think its pretty bad if the adoption agency is telling these parents oh by the way this kid is gay so you shouldnt be adopting them i dont know why its such a big issue. in fact i thought it was illegal.
no
why not?SEREMAKER wrote:
no
androoz wrote:
why not?SEREMAKER wrote:
no
rofl
What's gotten into you? If gay couples produced a hot chick like that (esp. triplets), I'd definitely want more gay couples around.SEREMAKER wrote:
http://forums.bf2s.com/img/avatars/52007.jpgandrooz wrote:
why not?SEREMAKER wrote:
no
mtb0minime wrote:
What's gotten into you? If gay couples produced a hot chick like that (esp. triplets), I'd definitely want more gay couples around.
Yes.
Too many kids need a loving home to not allow people who can provide that to do so.
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
No. Better for the kid.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
FEOS wrote:
Too many kids need a loving home to not allow people who can provide that to do so.
Absolutely.
Anyone, or couple that can provide love and stability to a child should be able to adopt. This is also one institution where I feel govt. should subsidize. the entire program.
Too many loving and able families out there have the means and desire to adopt a child but are kept down by the unbelievable high costs involved. A child's chance at stability and quality of life should not be road blocked by the inability to pay off the agency holding him. In my humble opinion it is no less than human trafficking..
Too many loving and able families out there have the means and desire to adopt a child but are kept down by the unbelievable high costs involved. A child's chance at stability and quality of life should not be road blocked by the inability to pay off the agency holding him. In my humble opinion it is no less than human trafficking..
Last edited by lowing (2010-03-12 04:23:59)
It's not that expensive if you take into account the tax breaks and grants from state and local governments. Anyone adopting a child is eligible for the tax breaks and those that adopt special needs get all kinds of help from local governments. As a side note, I would not like to see the process become much easier either. It is not a spur of the moment decision to be made and therefore needs to be drawn out most of the time. There are exceptions though.lowing wrote:
Anyone, or couple that can provide love and stability to a child should be able to adopt. This is also one institution where I feel govt. should subsidize. the entire program.
Too many loving and able families out there have the means and desire to adopt a child but are kept down by the unbelievable high costs involved. A child's chance at stability and quality of life should not be road blocked by the inability to pay off the agency holding him. In my humble opinion it is no less than human trafficking..
I have a problem with Homosexuals adopting kids, but I do feel it is ok because the need is there. Yes, I would be for ending the right if the need was not there. I feel the same way about single parents. Maybe even more so. Yes I have a narrow mind when it comes to providing the "best" available family life for a child.
"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)
Couldn't have said it better myself.FEOS wrote:
Too many kids need a loving home to not allow people who can provide that to do so.
Absolutely.
And I don't wanna hear any of the "well, the gay parents will turn the child gay". Well, it's not like we've never heard of straight parents with gay children! Never!
They aare engaged in the BUYING and SELLING of kids, and nothing less. Where money is involved you will always find politics and corruption. A childs life should not be dependant on the paying off of another.LividBovine wrote:
It's not that expensive if you take into account the tax breaks and grants from state and local governments. Anyone adopting a child is eligible for the tax breaks and those that adopt special needs get all kinds of help from local governments. As a side note, I would not like to see the process become much easier either. It is not a spur of the moment decision to be made and therefore needs to be drawn out most of the time. There are exceptions though.lowing wrote:
Anyone, or couple that can provide love and stability to a child should be able to adopt. This is also one institution where I feel govt. should subsidize. the entire program.
Too many loving and able families out there have the means and desire to adopt a child but are kept down by the unbelievable high costs involved. A child's chance at stability and quality of life should not be road blocked by the inability to pay off the agency holding him. In my humble opinion it is no less than human trafficking..
I have a problem with Homosexuals adopting kids, but I do feel it is ok because the need is there. Yes, I would be for ending the right if the need was not there. I feel the same way about single parents. Maybe even more so. Yes I have a narrow mind when it comes to providing the "best" available family life for a child.
Also regardless as to how you feel about gay couples adopting. the childs welfare in a loving gay home is a better option than no loving home at all.
Last edited by lowing (2010-03-13 12:54:28)
Hahah!mtb0minime wrote:
yes couples should be allowed to adopt gay babies (...)
Of course.
Troll thread fails.
Troll thread fails.
And androoz thought he was going to be controversial.
You are the worst troll I've ever laid eyes on.
You are the worst troll I've ever laid eyes on.
Better a loving home with a gay couple than an orphanage.
Artificial insemination and surrogates I think lame (if you want a kid, do it the right way), but giving a home to an unwanted child is a-ok in my book.
Artificial insemination and surrogates I think lame (if you want a kid, do it the right way), but giving a home to an unwanted child is a-ok in my book.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Sure. They may even prove more loving parents than straight couples given that most gay couples are committed to liberal ideals. If the child does not turn out to be what they expected, they would likely be the most accepting.
"May' is key. It obviously varies between couples.
"May' is key. It obviously varies between couples.
The shape of an eye in front of the ocean, digging for stones and throwing them against its window pane. Take it down dreamer, take it down deep. - Other Families
I see, so conservative couples are less likely to love their children.Pochsy wrote:
Sure. They may even prove more loving parents than straight couples given that most gay couples are committed to liberal ideals. If the child does not turn out to be what they expected, they would likely be the most accepting.
"May' is key. It obviously varies between couples.
Can't understand how ENTITLEMENT ideals are more loving than EARNING ideals, but hey you wouldn't be liberal if you didn't believe that bullshit.
Last edited by lowing (2010-03-13 13:50:47)
I see no problem with it. In fact the choice to have a child in a gay relationship (adoption) is likely to be a more considered decision since theres no possibility of an "accident" then they must really want the child.
that was JESUS that said that too. Well said Jesus!Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
I see no problem with it. In fact the choice to have a child in a gay relationship (adoption) is likely to be a more considered decision since theres no possibility of an "accident" then they must really want the child.
btw anyone here agree that EVERYONE wanting kids should undergo rigorous testing to ascertain their suitability?