cl4u53w1t2 wrote:
"A war of aggression is a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a war crime under the customary international law."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_aggression
"The invasion of Iraq was neither in self-defense against armed attack nor sanctioned by UN Security Counsel resolution authorizing the use of force by member states and thus constituted the crime of war of aggression, according to the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) in Geneva. A "war waged without a clear mandate from the United Nations Security Council would constitute a flagrant violation of the prohibition of the use of force.” We note with “deep dismay that a small number of states are poised to launch an outright illegal invasion of Iraq, which amounts to a war of aggression."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_o … aggression
That means their opinion is interesting but irrelevant.wiki page on ICJ wrote:
The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) is an international human rights non-governmental organisation.
The bottomline is that there is sufficient ambiguity in the existing UN resolutions re Iraq that one could never prove lack of UN authorization for use of force. Hence no action or admonishment by the UN general assembly or security council (or even attempts, knowing the US would veto them).
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular