Simple solution.Mekstizzle wrote:
but no wallhack bf2-UAV ball
Engineer gets shotguns.
Recon gets SMGs.
Sniper out the door.
Assault gets an M79 with universal weapons so that he doesn't steal recon's thunder.
Pages: 1 … 65 66 67 68 69 … 227
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield Bad Company 2 »
- [Battlefield: Bad Company 2] Official Thread
Engineer gets shotguns.
Recon gets SMGs.
Sniper out the door.
Assault gets an M79 with universal weapons so that he doesn't steal recon's thunder.
Which route is that, following the pipes, isn't that bit blocked off by all those concrete crates and shit (and you can't shoot your way through), unless you're talking about a route which diverges abit higher up the hill. I think I remember taking a slightly different 'road' route to the top of the hill once, but usually it's the standard route for me. But I can't visualise what route you're talking about...GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Ahhh priceless buttfuck...
It never gets boring to take the T90 from the not so usual hill ride to the blackhawk and simply put buttfuck the defenders that run around in panic and suprised where the hell u came from with T90.
They do. The PS3 CPU is even better.FloppY_ wrote:
Claiming that Consoles have better processors than PCs...Finray wrote:
Why?FloppY_ wrote:
I lol'd
The XBox 360 core is like a 3-core i7. It's that good.
Removing the sniper class would get the same reaction as taking dedis from MW2, especially from the console community.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The only way to fix this problem is to remove the sniper class from gameplay.
What about CQB snipers?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
and the fact that all of those morons also have diluted themselves into the believe that killing people without putting yourself in danger is the most skillful way to play.
As fun as it is, in a setting that isn't World War 2 where using the bolt-actions with iron sights is some of the best gameplay imaginable, it is just not plausible. If you are given a bolt action rifle in a modern war, you'd expect it to have a scope on it.Finray wrote:
Removing the sniper class would get the same reaction as taking dedis from MW2, especially from the console community.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
The only way to fix this problem is to remove the sniper class from gameplay.What about CQB snipers?Doctor Strangelove wrote:
and the fact that all of those morons also have diluted themselves into the believe that killing people without putting yourself in danger is the most skillful way to play.
And as for the first point, I've stated that already. To many morons are entrenched in the "pr0 sn1p3r" mentality that if a game were to not have snipers in it, a large portion of the potential player base would not buy it.
I mean, even Team Fortress 2 has a sniper in it. And Valve themselves have made some not so subtle statements in their games that the sniper/camper is not a gameplay style that they like. And yet they still put it in their games because it's a very poor marketing decision to remove the sniper, even if it is much better in both long and short term for the game and the team-based shooter genre as a whole.
Shit I love bolts on CoD2. Something satisfying about putting a well aimed round into someone's head who milliseconds ago was spraying MP44 at me.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
As fun as it is, in a setting that isn't World War 2 where using the bolt-actions with iron sights is some of the best gameplay imaginable, it is just not plausible. If you are given a bolt action rifle in a modern war, you'd expect it to have a scope on it.
Yeah I know I just thought it was a good analagy and wanted to post itDoctor Strangelove wrote:
And as for the first point, I've stated that already.
The TF2 sniper with the introduction of the Huntsman has been made more CQB and less campycampycampy.. but I see your point.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I mean, even Team Fortress 2 has a sniper in it. And Valve themselves have made some not so subtle statements in their games that the sniper/camper is not a gameplay style that they like. And yet they still put it in their games because it's a very poor marketing decision to remove the sniper, even if it is much better in both long and short term for the game and the team-based shooter genre as a whole.
Lets start from beginning:Mekstizzle wrote:
Which route is that, following the pipes, isn't that bit blocked off by all those concrete crates and shit (and you can't shoot your way through), unless you're talking about a route which diverges abit higher up the hill. I think I remember taking a slightly different 'road' route to the top of the hill once, but usually it's the standard route for me. But I can't visualise what route you're talking about...GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Ahhh priceless buttfuck...
It never gets boring to take the T90 from the not so usual hill ride to the blackhawk and simply put buttfuck the defenders that run around in panic and suprised where the hell u came from with T90.
Spawn at the tank, drive towards hill like usual, but when u get to the pipes, you drive on them. One you reach the end of the straight part of the pipe jsut drive off it, shoot way through the concrete barricade leading to out of the map. Drive full speed and start leaning towardws the hill before the map markers warning of the edge. Once u are on top, the tank slips just under the pipe which is raised from ground level at the back of the spawn. You have whole side of the base to choose the best attack route, no way they have the whole perimeter mined. That way first, we passed the mines by going on top of the pipes, then the mines at the killzone aka boxed route.
Enjoy you spawn rape.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Well the huntsman sniper was more in the same vain as the CoD1/2/5 bolt action rifleman. He was able to preform the same role as a sniper, providing accurate fire, but he did it in a way where he was much more useful to his team and also much more vulnerable to enemy fire. That kind of gameplay is a very good thing, it allows a player to enjoy the rewards of skillful marksmanship, while both allowing him to be more focused on teamwork and increase his vulnerability.Finray wrote:
Shit I love bolts on CoD2. Something satisfying about putting a well aimed round into someone's head who milliseconds ago was spraying MP44 at me.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
As fun as it is, in a setting that isn't World War 2 where using the bolt-actions with iron sights is some of the best gameplay imaginable, it is just not plausible. If you are given a bolt action rifle in a modern war, you'd expect it to have a scope on it.Yeah I know I just thought it was a good analagy and wanted to post itDoctor Strangelove wrote:
And as for the first point, I've stated that already.The TF2 sniper with the introduction of the Huntsman has been made more CQB and less campycampycampy.. but I see your point.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I mean, even Team Fortress 2 has a sniper in it. And Valve themselves have made some not so subtle statements in their games that the sniper/camper is not a gameplay style that they like. And yet they still put it in their games because it's a very poor marketing decision to remove the sniper, even if it is much better in both long and short term for the game and the team-based shooter genre as a whole.
And while BC2 does have the option to play like this with the 4x ACOG and 1.5x RDS attachments, most people will just use the default 8x scope or the 12x scope and sit on a hill two feet from the spawn and got 5/1 for the whole round.
Or some other grenade launcher like the xm320(it is designed to be able to be standalone).Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Simple solution.Mekstizzle wrote:
but no wallhack bf2-UAV ball
Engineer gets shotguns.
Recon gets SMGs.
Sniper out the door.
Assault gets an M79 with universal weapons so that he doesn't steal recon's thunder.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
M79 is a fucking classic. Come on.War Man wrote:
Or some other grenade launcher like the xm320(it is designed to be able to be standalone).Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Simple solution.Mekstizzle wrote:
but no wallhack bf2-UAV ball
Engineer gets shotguns.
Recon gets SMGs.
Sniper out the door.
Assault gets an M79 with universal weapons so that he doesn't steal recon's thunder.
Any gun with an "x" in its name is teh ghey.
rename it the m320.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
M79 is a fucking classic. Come on.War Man wrote:
Or some other grenade launcher like the xm320(it is designed to be able to be standalone).Doctor Strangelove wrote:
Simple solution.
Engineer gets shotguns.
Recon gets SMGs.
Sniper out the door.
Assault gets an M79 with universal weapons so that he doesn't steal recon's thunder.
Any gun with an "x" in its name is teh ghey.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
I think you miss the point.War Man wrote:
rename it the m320.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
M79 is a fucking classic. Come on.War Man wrote:
Or some other grenade launcher like the xm320(it is designed to be able to be standalone).
Any gun with an "x" in its name is teh ghey.
m320 makes a bit more sense to add it.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I think you miss the point.War Man wrote:
rename it the m320.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
M79 is a fucking classic. Come on.
Any gun with an "x" in its name is teh ghey.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
No one uses the XM320, the SEALS still use the M79.War Man wrote:
m320 makes a bit more sense to add it.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I think you miss the point.War Man wrote:
rename it the m320.
Also parts of the game take place in South America where an M79 would not be hard to come by.
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
This is the army, not the SEALs
unfairROGUEDD wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Lake … e_Launcher tbh
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
here is the route, Mek.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
unfortunately every time i try that... let's just say that tanks are not stealthy machines.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
That shit is bitchin'. Wo-man just be hatin.War Man wrote:
This is the army, not the SEALsunfairROGUEDD wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Lake … e_Launcher tbh
Make X-meds a full member, for the sake of 15 year old anal gangbang porn watchers everywhere!
Anyone know if BF2s is going to have BC2 servers?
No it's an unfair match against this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milkor_MGLROGUEDD wrote:
That shit is bitchin'. Wo-man just be hatin.War Man wrote:
This is the army, not the SEALsunfairROGUEDD wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China_Lake … e_Launcher tbh
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Personally I shoot the first barricades and drive up the small walkway in the woods.. (It fits like a glove)
I lol'ed at driving on the pipes tho'
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
A lot of army units have used the M79 again, same with the M72.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
No one uses the XM320, the SEALS still use the M79.War Man wrote:
m320 makes a bit more sense to add it.Doctor Strangelove wrote:
I think you miss the point.
Also parts of the game take place in South America where an M79 would not be hard to come by.
M320 is in use with certain units as well.
I HATE snipers.
Last night i was playing as a defender and it was a full 12v12 match and everyone on my team was a sniper. Literally, everyone! And there i was running round as an engineer trying to blow the tanks up with an RPG...
The game lasted about 7 minutes... going through every single crate after the first 2 minutes... does not describe my mood!
Last night i was playing as a defender and it was a full 12v12 match and everyone on my team was a sniper. Literally, everyone! And there i was running round as an engineer trying to blow the tanks up with an RPG...
The game lasted about 7 minutes... going through every single crate after the first 2 minutes... does not describe my mood!
Console only gets 24players ?SEREVENT wrote:
I HATE snipers.
Last night i was playing as a defender and it was a full 12v12 match and everyone on my team was a sniper. Literally, everyone! And there i was running round as an engineer trying to blow the tanks up with an RPG...
The game lasted about 7 minutes... going through every single crate after the first 2 minutes... does not describe my mood!
Your thoughts, insights, and musings on this matter intrigue me
Pages: 1 … 65 66 67 68 69 … 227
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield Bad Company 2 »
- [Battlefield: Bad Company 2] Official Thread