Commercially bought history books don't generally try to force you to have an opinion either way. Granted, the old saying "history is written by the conquerer" definitely applies but usually no conflict is that cut and dry. "Victory" doesn't usually end with the extermination of the losing race.KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
So you have or haven't read his book? How is he instigating racial and class warfare?
'Going the opposite direction' would mean that you view 'standard' history books as equally skewed, no? Where's the insipid hatred for those?
If I pick up a standard history book on the Civil War, WWII, the Middle Ages or whatever other time period I can usually find dry accounts written objectively. Will the writer have his or her own prejudices? Sure, but most tell the story for the love of history rather than trying to get you to change your opinion on a matter.
Text books written for schools are an entirely different matter.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat