How can anyone take this douchebag seriously, and, how can people ignore what he says but criticize other people that say pretty much the same thing?
Tu Stultus Es
They are all whiny morons. Listening to them for fun/enjoyment is one thing. Regurgitating what they say as your ideological platform is a fucking joke.DBBrinson1 wrote:
That was a stretch. Granted Beck is whiny moron, however he actually has the countries best interests in mind -unlike the Oberleader. I find it disturbing that Fact checking and vetting is left to him and widly ignored by the media (Van Jones).
This. Of course the reaction to Beck is far more entertaining than anything he writes, says, or does.burnzz wrote:
he's in the entertainment business.
Whose fault is that?eleven bravo wrote:
he may say he is an entertainer but I would bet a large portion of his listening and viewing public dont see him that way.
Yea, he actually mocks he devout followers sometimes.JohnG@lt wrote:
Whose fault is that?eleven bravo wrote:
he may say he is an entertainer but I would bet a large portion of his listening and viewing public dont see him that way.
like the guy who lost that election in NY?Kmarion wrote:
Yea, he actually mocks he devout followers sometimes.JohnG@lt wrote:
Whose fault is that?eleven bravo wrote:
he may say he is an entertainer but I would bet a large portion of his listening and viewing public dont see him that way.
He does it in a manner that illustrates why you should not hang on someones every word. Not to try and win votes.eleven bravo wrote:
like the guy who lost that election in NY?Kmarion wrote:
Yea, he actually mocks he devout followers sometimes.JohnG@lt wrote:
Whose fault is that?
In the sense that she would be perfectly happy staying home, out of politics, like Washington. I believe George Washington though.Phrozenbot wrote:
He said Sarah Palin was the modern George Washington of our time.
I hope fervently that she doesn't. She would guarantee a second term for ObamaPhrozenbot wrote:
Yea, what makes you think she won't run in 2012?
truth - that's only if she's nominated though. but considering the number of insane social conservatives there are, i wouldn't be surprised if she did easilyJohnG@lt wrote:
I hope fervently that she doesn't. She would guarantee a second term for ObamaPhrozenbot wrote:
Yea, what makes you think she won't run in 2012?
The problem with that is only registered Republicans can vote in the primaries. Us independents get shut out and we're the ones that would be screaming at the far right not to vote for her She could probably carry the primaries among registered RepublicansSpark wrote:
truth - that's only if she's nominated though. but considering the number of insane social conservatives there are, i wouldn't be surprised if she did easilyJohnG@lt wrote:
I hope fervently that she doesn't. She would guarantee a second term for ObamaPhrozenbot wrote:
Yea, what makes you think she won't run in 2012?
well i guess that's reasonable. after all it's the party's decision who they nominate.JohnG@lt wrote:
The problem with that is only registered Republicans can vote in the primaries. Us independents get shut out and we're the ones that would be screaming at the far right not to vote for her She could probably carry the primaries among registered RepublicansSpark wrote:
truth - that's only if she's nominated though. but considering the number of insane social conservatives there are, i wouldn't be surprised if she did easilyJohnG@lt wrote:
I hope fervently that she doesn't. She would guarantee a second term for Obama
See but that is part of the problem. A substancial base of the R's identifies with relegion. It is a great way to bring out the relegious right conservative votes. In turn the independants swing left. Shit, I don't blame em either.Spark wrote:
well i guess that's reasonable. after all it's the party's decision who they nominate.JohnG@lt wrote:
The problem with that is only registered Republicans can vote in the primaries. Us independents get shut out and we're the ones that would be screaming at the far right not to vote for her She could probably carry the primaries among registered RepublicansSpark wrote:
truth - that's only if she's nominated though. but considering the number of insane social conservatives there are, i wouldn't be surprised if she did easily
In some states at least. I'm all for open primaries across the board. My card still says [R]. Otherwise, being in Fl, I'd have no voice.JohnG@lt wrote:
The problem with that is only registered Republicans can vote in the primaries. Us independents get shut out and we're the ones that would be screaming at the far right not to vote for her She could probably carry the primaries among registered RepublicansSpark wrote:
truth - that's only if she's nominated though. but considering the number of insane social conservatives there are, i wouldn't be surprised if she did easilyJohnG@lt wrote:
I hope fervently that she doesn't. She would guarantee a second term for Obama
errr... I dunno about that. Remember Limbaughs "Operation Chaos"?Kmarion wrote:
In some states at least. I'm all for open primaries across the board. My card still says [R]. Otherwise, being in Fl, I'd have no voice.JohnG@lt wrote:
The problem with that is only registered Republicans can vote in the primaries. Us independents get shut out and we're the ones that would be screaming at the far right not to vote for her She could probably carry the primaries among registered RepublicansSpark wrote:
truth - that's only if she's nominated though. but considering the number of insane social conservatives there are, i wouldn't be surprised if she did easily