all this was a fart in a windstorm, and we can thank Finray for being the stinker; mkxiii already has tuckergustav down.Finray wrote:
Sorry if I sounded like a prick tonight btw, I just really want this to work.
I know?burnzz wrote:
all this was a fart in a windstorm, and we can thank Finray for being the stinker; mkxiii already has tuckergustav down.Finray wrote:
Sorry if I sounded like a prick tonight btw, I just really want this to work.
ffs Finray, she was already on the list . . .
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=134412
http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=134412haffeysucks wrote:
wait wait wait, where is the sign up thread? this idea has like 4 fucking separate threads...
i agree. boycott finrar.CanadianLoser wrote:
Finn, Tucker is a mother- slightly more mature than you I'd say. I don't think she'd fuck anything up. You aren't in charge of choosing who is on and off the list, Fin, and we aren't looking for your opinion. Keep it to yourself
Finrar Boycott - The Grandson of Geoffery.jsnipy wrote:
i agree. boycott finrar.CanadianLoser wrote:
Finn, Tucker is a mother- slightly more mature than you I'd say. I don't think she'd fuck anything up. You aren't in charge of choosing who is on and off the list, Fin, and we aren't looking for your opinion. Keep it to yourself
Never put ya trust in anyone other than yaself. Sorry if your religious no offence intended.Sydney wrote:
Right now, the only ones on the list I'm not 100% on are TSI and Blade.
Nothing personal, I just don't know you guys enough. I've seen TSI post every now and then, but I don't remember Blade at all.
I trust a lot of people, but for different things. When I said I trust them 100% above, I mean I trust them to take part in this without fucking up.1927 wrote:
Never put ya trust in anyone other than yaself. Sorry if your religious no offence intended.Sydney wrote:
Right now, the only ones on the list I'm not 100% on are TSI and Blade.
Nothing personal, I just don't know you guys enough. I've seen TSI post every now and then, but I don't remember Blade at all.
Are people just completely ignoring what I'm saying?CanadianLoser wrote:
Finn, Tucker is a mother- slightly more mature than you I'd say. I don't think she'd fuck anything up. You aren't in charge of choosing who is on and off the list, Fin, and we aren't looking for your opinion. Keep it to yourself
Finray wrote:
E: I'm not directing the filtering directly at tuckers, I'm pretty sure myself that she'd be able to send it on and not screw up, but we've got to draw the line somewhere when deciding on who to include and who not to. I've only seen tuckers surface about 3 times last year, it might have been more, whatever, but I'm certain ddenholm (the guy who screwed up the last time) posted more than that, and look where that got us.
Fucking hell.Finray wrote:
Look, I know it wasn't you who ruined it the first time. I'm not saying you shouldn't be involved, quite the opposite, if you wanted to do it and gave your word you wouldn't cock it up I'd believe that, and I'd vote for you, I'm just asking where we draw the line? Members under a month old? Sure, there are more things to judge on than posts/days/karma, which is why I'd give my vote to let you do it, since you are pretty mature, see your kid, and I'm sure you could afford $5 postage. But who do we draw the line at?tuckergustav wrote:
I signed up because I wanted to be a part of it. If you are going to give me such a hard time about wanting to be involved in something here...go ahead. I still want to do this. I watched the last one and thought it was very interesting to see people check in from around the world. I thought it would be great to be involved this time around. Don't make it so tense right from the start huh? It is supposed to be fun. Please stop giving me a hard time because some tool ruined it last time. It wasn't me...k?Finray wrote:
I'm not directing the filtering directly at tuckers, I'm pretty sure myself that she'd be able to send it on and not screw up
Take away your EE Chat/spam posts and lets see what most of you haveFinray wrote:
Less posts = value the forums less = less motivation to make this work.
Finray wrote:
More posts = spams more = less valuable to forums = doesnt care enough to make this work.
More posts doesn't mean spams more. It means is more active. I'd say 20%, infact I'll be generous, 30% of my posts are shit. That's still 7000 posts on topic and worth something.Winston_Churchill wrote:
Take away your EE Chat/spam posts and lets see what most of you haveFinray wrote:
Less posts = value the forums less = less motivation to make this work.
More accurately:Finray wrote:
More posts = spams more = less valuable to forums = doesnt care enough to make this work.
well said - so i take it you are fine sorting this out and don't need finray filtering this for you?mkxiii wrote:
(like blade, tucker etc) fighting their corners about being lesser known which i think makes them a lot more trustworthy as no one would go to that effort to fuck it up
i'm probably going to be asking anyone i can for opinions on anyone if they wish to put them forward but unless its a lot of people really against someone, which lets face it, aint really gonna happen, they wont affect me too muchburnzz wrote:
well said - so i take it you are fine sorting this out and don't need finray filtering this for you?mkxiii wrote:
(like blade, tucker etc) fighting their corners about being lesser known which i think makes them a lot more trustworthy as no one would go to that effort to fuck it up
Never said I was filtering it or never did say specifically nobody would be allowed to, I just suggested people I didn't know well on the list.burnzz wrote:
well said - so i take it you are fine sorting this out and don't need finray filtering this for you?mkxiii wrote:
(like blade, tucker etc) fighting their corners about being lesser known which i think makes them a lot more trustworthy as no one would go to that effort to fuck it up
Riiight.burnzz wrote:
MEMBER [Finray] SHOULD NOT BE ON THE LIST FOR REASON [trying to run everything]
