You say this as if you somehow will never hit 70, but what the hell, it is still 55 years away.ruisleipa wrote:
send 'em off on an ice floe when they hit 70 tbh.Turquoise wrote:
Instead of cutting back on education, the U.K. should cut back on pensions.
Of all the social safety nets out there, the one that never really makes sense in the long run is retirement. Healthcare, education, and temporary help between jobs makes sense, but retirement is a personal responsibility.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- UK Universities Warn That They Face 'Meltdown'
Super-annuation.
THANK YOU KEATING BRO YOU ARE EPIC.
THANK YOU KEATING BRO YOU ARE EPIC.
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
It's not the site. It's the people. The stupid, stupid people.Turquoise wrote:
If you can find an equivalent site that is more balanced, I'll gladly link it in my sig. I just thought these people were hilarious.FEOS wrote:
Then I took a look at the link in Turq's sig and saw how ridiculously one-sided it was and I just sighed and gently facepalmed.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
If you raise fee's in universities you'll create a situation where only the rich will be able to afford education and the poor will not! Not good in my eyes as everyone is or should be entitled to an education if they so choose. Yes uni's are fooked at the moment but so is everyone else, it seems as if it is easier to cut money from the things that the U.K holds dear, NHS, School/Educational Establishments than for the government to admit that they have done a lot wrong recently. I mean come on look at all the people in the civil service, it takes 5 people to do 1 job at the moment, due to health and safety concerns and so fourth. Its a farce to be honest People need to work harder and bring more productivity to the UK in general, but I speak for few of us out here that do work hard.
Why should we pay taxes for the military? Why can't each person just protect his own family?lowing wrote:
I see, your retirement is YOUR responsibility, but your health care and your education is supposed to be MY responsibility? I loathe the day. As far as unemployment, that is insurance people who work pay for, they are owed that.Turquoise wrote:
Instead of cutting back on education, the U.K. should cut back on pensions.
Of all the social safety nets out there, the one that never really makes sense in the long run is retirement. Healthcare, education, and temporary help between jobs makes sense, but retirement is a personal responsibility.
I think this is where the fundamental disagreement lies.artofsurvival wrote:
a lot of stuff...entitled...a lot of stuff
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
The rich get richer and the poor gets poorer Sad but true.
Forcing universities to up their prices until only the rich can afford it would be stupid. It would render the UK unable to compete in the future once the next generation retires. It make work in the US, but over here a lot of people cannot afford the 20/30,000k worth of debt they leave university with, so the amount of people who would pay 150,000k would be practically none. It's already at a point where people have to consider whether a degree is worth that amount of debt, but with US pricing it would create a serious drought on employees with higher education.
4k a year of personal expense for an education is considered excessive? Seriously? Considering you leave with a college degree and prospects for a good-paying profession afterward where you can rapidly pay off that rather pittance of a debt (more like an investment, tbh).ghettoperson wrote:
Forcing universities to up their prices until only the rich can afford it would be stupid. It would render the UK unable to compete in the future once the next generation retires. It make work in the US, but over here a lot of people cannot afford the 20/30,000k worth of debt they leave university with, so the amount of people who would pay 150,000k would be practically none. It's already at a point where people have to consider whether a degree is worth that amount of debt, but with US pricing it would create a serious drought on employees with higher education.
As Turq says WRT health care "it works elsewhere, so it must work here". It works here, so it must work there. I just think people don't want to assume personal risk for personal gain.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
― Albert Einstein
Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
Bear in mind here tuition fees doesn't include accommodation like it does in the States, so it's more like 7.5k, not including food/books and the like. Which I think actually makes it fairly comparable to going to an in-state college ? But yes, to most people in the UK that's a lot of money, especially given the current jobs market. I have friends who one year on from graduating are still working in supermarkets.FEOS wrote:
4k a year of personal expense for an education is considered excessive? Seriously? Considering you leave with a college degree and prospects for a good-paying profession afterward where you can rapidly pay off that rather pittance of a debt (more like an investment, tbh).ghettoperson wrote:
Forcing universities to up their prices until only the rich can afford it would be stupid. It would render the UK unable to compete in the future once the next generation retires. It make work in the US, but over here a lot of people cannot afford the 20/30,000k worth of debt they leave university with, so the amount of people who would pay 150,000k would be practically none. It's already at a point where people have to consider whether a degree is worth that amount of debt, but with US pricing it would create a serious drought on employees with higher education.
As Turq says WRT health care "it works elsewhere, so it must work here". It works here, so it must work there. I just think people don't want to assume personal risk for personal gain.
At the end of the day, people are willing to go 30k into debt in order to get a better job, but 130k? In order to pay that off, you'd be wanting to get straight into a job paying 50k PA to make it worthwhile.
I'm done soon so couldn't care less...just means less kids going to uni, less punks competing for my awsm lawyer job.
tuition and dorms/food are separate fees.ghettoperson wrote:
Bear in mind here tuition fees doesn't include accommodation like it does in the States, so it's more like 7.5k, not including food/books and the like. Which I think actually makes it fairly comparable to going to an in-state college ? But yes, to most people in the UK that's a lot of money, especially given the current jobs market. I have friends who one year on from graduating are still working in supermarkets.FEOS wrote:
4k a year of personal expense for an education is considered excessive? Seriously? Considering you leave with a college degree and prospects for a good-paying profession afterward where you can rapidly pay off that rather pittance of a debt (more like an investment, tbh).ghettoperson wrote:
Forcing universities to up their prices until only the rich can afford it would be stupid. It would render the UK unable to compete in the future once the next generation retires. It make work in the US, but over here a lot of people cannot afford the 20/30,000k worth of debt they leave university with, so the amount of people who would pay 150,000k would be practically none. It's already at a point where people have to consider whether a degree is worth that amount of debt, but with US pricing it would create a serious drought on employees with higher education.
As Turq says WRT health care "it works elsewhere, so it must work here". It works here, so it must work there. I just think people don't want to assume personal risk for personal gain.
At the end of the day, people are willing to go 30k into debt in order to get a better job, but 130k? In order to pay that off, you'd be wanting to get straight into a job paying 50k PA to make it worthwhile.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
Haha Teddy, that had occurred to me. I'm paying 3k, and unless I want to do a Masters I can't be affected by any tuition increase. However, that doesn't mean that increasing the tuition fees is a good idea for the UK as a whole.
Really? I'm pretty sure Princeton and places that are charging 45k include accommodation in that.JohnG@lt wrote:
tuition and dorms/food are separate fees.ghettoperson wrote:
Bear in mind here tuition fees doesn't include accommodation like it does in the States, so it's more like 7.5k, not including food/books and the like. Which I think actually makes it fairly comparable to going to an in-state college ? But yes, to most people in the UK that's a lot of money, especially given the current jobs market. I have friends who one year on from graduating are still working in supermarkets.FEOS wrote:
4k a year of personal expense for an education is considered excessive? Seriously? Considering you leave with a college degree and prospects for a good-paying profession afterward where you can rapidly pay off that rather pittance of a debt (more like an investment, tbh).
As Turq says WRT health care "it works elsewhere, so it must work here". It works here, so it must work there. I just think people don't want to assume personal risk for personal gain.
At the end of the day, people are willing to go 30k into debt in order to get a better job, but 130k? In order to pay that off, you'd be wanting to get straight into a job paying 50k PA to make it worthwhile.
You're talking about a private college. Tuition alone would be cheaper if you chose to commute or live off campus and not pay for a dorm room + meal plan. The average cost of college here in America is far far far below what it costs to attend an Ivy League school. They can charge so much because they have millions of people that want to attend their schools.ghettoperson wrote:
Really? I'm pretty sure Princeton and places that are charging 45k include accommodation in that.JohnG@lt wrote:
tuition and dorms/food are separate fees.ghettoperson wrote:
Bear in mind here tuition fees doesn't include accommodation like it does in the States, so it's more like 7.5k, not including food/books and the like. Which I think actually makes it fairly comparable to going to an in-state college ? But yes, to most people in the UK that's a lot of money, especially given the current jobs market. I have friends who one year on from graduating are still working in supermarkets.
At the end of the day, people are willing to go 30k into debt in order to get a better job, but 130k? In order to pay that off, you'd be wanting to get straight into a job paying 50k PA to make it worthwhile.
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
The UK is already screwed...I'll work in the city for a couple years and then I'm out of that melting pot.
But state colleges get funding from the government don't they?
Honestly, if I had to fork out what you'll have to pay I'd do my undergrad in Norway and save my money for a masters in England. You will be leaving with a shit load of debt. I know UCL is one of your choices in which case you'll be broke.Jenspm wrote:
I haven't read up, but it'll probably affect me, being not only international, but also a Non-EU student.
Oh well. We have sweet students loans over here (£25k/year ftw), so it's k.
They do, but the vast majority of money they make comes from tuition.ghettoperson wrote:
But state colleges get funding from the government don't they?
Average College Prices 2009-10
Private four-year $26,273
Public four-year $7,020
"Ah, you miserable creatures! You who think that you are so great! You who judge humanity to be so small! You who wish to reform everything! Why don't you reform yourselves? That task would be sufficient enough."
-Frederick Bastiat
-Frederick Bastiat
I'll manage. Parents are ftw..teddy..jimmy wrote:
Honestly, if I had to fork out what you'll have to pay I'd do my undergrad in Norway and save my money for a masters in England. You will be leaving with a shit load of debt. I know UCL is one of your choices in which case you'll be broke.Jenspm wrote:
I haven't read up, but it'll probably affect me, being not only international, but also a Non-EU student.
Oh well. We have sweet students loans over here (£25k/year ftw), so it's k.
If it's any consolation lowing, you'll have a lot fewer people on welfare if you make it easier for them to get educated and stay healthy.lowing wrote:
I see, your retirement is YOUR responsibility, but your health care and your education is supposed to be MY responsibility? I loathe the day. As far as unemployment, that is insurance people who work pay for, they are owed that.Turquoise wrote:
Instead of cutting back on education, the U.K. should cut back on pensions.
Of all the social safety nets out there, the one that never really makes sense in the long run is retirement. Healthcare, education, and temporary help between jobs makes sense, but retirement is a personal responsibility.
Think of it like this... your choices are the following...
1) Let the market clear everything, but the resulting poverty leads to a lot of crime and a much more dangerous society to live in
2) Socialize education and healthcare, so that there are fewer people in poverty, and they tend to not cost as much from showing up in the ER as often
Like it or not, poverty will always exist, and as long as you live in a society, you'll have to pay somewhat for the mistakes of others.
That and private colleges still receive billions upon billions in federal endowments.JohnG@lt wrote:
You're talking about a private college. Tuition alone would be cheaper if you chose to commute or live off campus and not pay for a dorm room + meal plan. The average cost of college here in America is far far far below what it costs to attend an Ivy League school. They can charge so much because they have millions of people that want to attend their schools.
Harvard makes so much money from endowments that they wouldn't even have to charge tuition from now on, if they just used the endowments for the running of the school.
So even our so-called private schools are socialized, but not in a way that actually benefits you or me.
Pages: 1 2
- Index »
- Community »
- Debate and Serious Talk »
- UK Universities Warn That They Face 'Meltdown'