And if you don't?...(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Well you have to think, if you belive in god, then you know he has all the power he wants, so he could have flooded the entire earth then just put new animals, new fish, new plants back on it.. DUH!, you guys need to think outside the box
u think inside the boxDaysniper wrote:
And if you don't?...(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Well you have to think, if you belive in god, then you know he has all the power he wants, so he could have flooded the entire earth then just put new animals, new fish, new plants back on it.. DUH!, you guys need to think outside the box
While continental drift has occured throughout history, it is a gradual process. In the last 10,000 years nothing has really happened:sfg-Ice__ wrote:
Here are some factors you didn't inlcude in your equations...Continental drift and riseing and lowering of plates (this region has had active volcanic activity). Also, there is some speculation that the flood was combined with other forms of natural disaster which contributed to its height.
Don't forget that there are massive reserves of saline AND freshwater underground.mcminty wrote:
A water level of 5,000 meters... Sorry to break it to you but if all ice on earth melted, the water level would only be 83 (+/- 5m) meters higher.JaMDuDe wrote:
its around 15,000 feet up...hows that a local flood?275 (ft) divided by 3.3 = 83 meters. Ergo, there no possibility of a 15,000 ft flood.http://www.ncpa.org/ba/ba282.html wrote:
If all the earth's frozen water melted, scientists say sea levels could rise about another 275 feet.http://www.dnr.nsw.gov.au/salinity/basics/index.htm Talking about the salinity in East Coast Australia, you have to understand a majority of the problem is through improper management practices such as broad scale clearing of native vegetation for agricultural and urban development.So you've got inward flowing rivers in a continent with a sunken centre. You end up with a very flat land, it gets flatter and flatter retaining its sediment and it becomes a land of flood plains and at the same time of course it is retaining its salt."
Looks like water does flow down and thus taking the salt with it. Since the flood, has it ever rained? And considering that there was enough water to cover the entire planet, don't you think the salinity would be diluted?http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution - You might learn something.wannabe_tank_whore wrote:
So, when we 'evolved' how many humans evolved at the same time? Did all the sudden 3 females and 3 males evolve? Would be very coincidental for these humans to evolve from land animals into several humans at once and then turned around and populated the earth.
my sentiments exactly.its good comedy just not seriousB.Schuss wrote:
lmao. No offense to those who believe in god, the bible, etc, but that's just plain stupid. Discussing Noah's ark in this section ? please...
all the water was salty... how can u give that many animals water... dont gimme the boil the water bullshit... coz the earth cannot get flooded since the bible said 40 days of rain right? rain comes from the ocean and that means that the water level must have been lowered dramatically to cause 40 days of rain, and 40 days without rain and no cloud? theres gotta be rain once in a whileJaMDuDe wrote:
It did happen. Building the boat, getting enough water, getting the animals and enough food/water on the boat was all possible.
you need to see thisJaMDuDe wrote:
It did happen. Building the boat, getting enough water, getting the animals and enough food/water on the boat was all possible.
Well, good sir, could you tell us how?JaMDuDe wrote:
It did happen. Building the boat, getting enough water, getting the animals and enough food/water on the boat was all possible.
Last edited by JaMDuDe (2006-04-15 18:38:13)
Last edited by Tyferra (2006-04-15 19:32:12)
Yes, that website is quite amusing, and they do make an effort to provide evidence for their case. However, a great deal of their evidence comes directly from the bible (which is not a reliable scientific source of information), and their viewpoint is extremely biased. I've read more than I want to from that site and answersingenesis.com because wannabe_tank_whore keeps linking them and acting like that proves his entire case, and all I've seen so far is weak arguments with little or no proof, and in some cases information that is blatantly wrong. I give you an example from christiananswers.net:JaMDuDe wrote:
http://christiananswers.net/creation/menu-catastrophe.html now u can laugh at it and say how its not real
Now I can assure you that there is no way in hell that there was only one continent a few thousand years ago. Continents do not just up and seperate themselves on a whim, these things take hundreds of thousands of years, if not longer. Heres another example from answersingenesis.org:We also do not know what the geography of the world was like before the flood. If there was only one continent at that time, then questions of getting animals from remote regions to the ark are not relevant.
Theres some nice logic for you. Dinosaurs could not have lived millions of years ago because God made them 6000 years ago. And all those scientists who disagree are godless fools.As you add up all of the dates, and accepting that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came to Earth almost 2000 years ago, we come to the conclusion that the creation of the Earth and animals (including the dinosaurs) occurred only thousands of years ago (perhaps only 6000!), not millions of years. Thus, if the Bible is right (and it is!), dinosaurs must have lived within the past thousands of years.
Please can we all stop with the "earth forming so only 1000's years ago".Skruples wrote:
Now I can assure you that there is no way in hell that there was only one continent a few thousand years ago. Continents do not just up and seperate themselves on a whim, these things take hundreds of thousands of years, if not longer. Heres another example from answersingenesis.org:We also do not know what the geography of the world was like before the flood. If there was only one continent at that time, then questions of getting animals from remote regions to the ark are not relevant.Theres some nice logic for you. Dinosaurs could not have lived millions of years ago because God made them 6000 years ago. And all those scientists who disagree are godless fools.As you add up all of the dates, and accepting that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, came to Earth almost 2000 years ago, we come to the conclusion that the creation of the Earth and animals (including the dinosaurs) occurred only thousands of years ago (perhaps only 6000!), not millions of years. Thus, if the Bible is right (and it is!), dinosaurs must have lived within the past thousands of years.
You see why these sites cannot be accepted as reliable sources of information?
Last edited by Daysniper (2006-04-16 06:10:22)
I Didn't say I believed in god. It was not the question at all, you get lost easy.(EUS)Gen.BadSnipaDay wrote:
Well you have to think, if you belive in god, then you know he has all the power he wants, so he could have flooded the entire earth then just put new animals, new fish, new plants back on it.. DUH!, you guys need to think outside the box
Last edited by Horseman 77 (2006-04-16 14:38:30)