BF2S Forums and the moral of this story is.........

lowing wrote:

jord wrote:

lowing wrote:

Yeah, Dilbert is right here.

Oh come on it was clearly my idea.

no he is disagreeing with you through sarcasm

Ahh I see.

I thought you would of gone for my idea Lowing, means a lot less taxes. Well infact none. And the competent and strong amongst society will be a lot better off financially.

Last edited by jord (2009-11-12 04:53:29)

jord wrote:

I thought you would of gone for my idea Lowing, means a lot less taxes. Well infact none. And the competent and strong amongst society will be a lot better off financially.

And we'd be able to eat the babies of poor people and moslems.
It would be just like the crusades, except we'd have guns and awesome cars like in Mad Max, how cool would that be?

Last edited by Dilbert_X (2009-11-12 04:56:12)

Dilbert_X wrote:

jord wrote:

I thought you would of gone for my idea Lowing, means a lot less taxes. Well infact none. And the competent and strong amongst society will be a lot better off financially.

And we'd be able to eat the babies of poor people and moslems.
It would be just like the crusades, except we'd have guns and awesome cars like in Mad Max, how cool would that be?

Awesome. That would solve unemployment and population growth as well!

Think about it, no taxes, you get to zoom around in a car doing whatever you want, and peons have to pay you for it.
Sounds awesome, you're clearly a blue-sky thinker lowing.

lowing wrote:

DonFck wrote:

lowing wrote:

The company I work for.

Let's continue in that direction, yes..

Who paid your company so that you could get paid?

My company was awarded a contract from the US govt.............and?

The correct answer: the tax payer.

Dilbert_X wrote:

So stupid kids pay nothing to go to school since the don't learn anything?
Seems fair, because they won't be earning anything either.

See I've thought this through. If only there a large island somewhere populated largely by convicts to implement this new Government idea.

jord wrote:

Dilbert_X wrote:

So stupid kids pay nothing to go to school since the don't learn anything?
Seems fair, because they won't be earning anything either.

See I've thought this through. If only there a large island somewhere populated largely by convicts to implement this new Government idea.

Now where to find such an island..

Its funny as someone pointed out, lowing worked for a company that relies on GASP GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS WHICH MEANS HES A LEACH OF THE SYSTEM. PARADOXIAL LOGIC GRAAAAAAAAH.

But as someone mentioned about paying the fire department... Yeah that did happen before it was mandated as a public service, you paid for fire department insurance, if they don't see the tag they let your house burn down.

Economically speaking, it is cheaper to run services through the gov when it is not a for profit business, and a career for a PUBLIC servant, in order to serve and protect.

lowing should go read Jennifer Government, pure capitalism at its best.

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

DonFck wrote:

Let's continue in that direction, yes..

Who paid your company so that you could get paid?

My company was awarded a contract from the US govt.............and?

The correct answer: the tax payer.

Yeah......................and?

Cybargs wrote:

Its funny as someone pointed out, lowing worked for a company that relies on GASP GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS WHICH MEANS HES A LEACH OF THE SYSTEM. PARADOXIAL LOGIC GRAAAAAAAAH.

But as someone mentioned about paying the fire department... Yeah that did happen before it was mandated as a public service, you paid for fire department insurance, if they don't see the tag they let your house burn down.

Economically speaking, it is cheaper to run services through the gov when it is not a for profit business, and a career for a PUBLIC servant, in order to serve and protect.

lowing should go read Jennifer Government, pure capitalism at its best.

WORKING for anyone is not leeching. Taking from someone with nothing to offer in return is leeching. Please try harder to keep that FACT straight.

Bending definitions and actions, and meanings to form an argument SPECIFICALLY for me and not apply it anywhere else is just another desperate attempt at forming so sort of argument at all.

I don't mind paying taxes, as I know they are necessary for our country to function.  I'm all about cracking down on people who screw over the system and eek through loopholes so they don't have to pay, plus asking those who have gotten so much out of the system that they just give back a better adjusted amount that reciprocates the same percentage that the middle and lower classes have to give is only fair.  If they don't want to give back to the country, then let them leave.

lowing wrote:

http://finance.yahoo.com/career-work/article/108119/the-accidental-hero.html?mod=career-selfemployment


let people keep their money and they will spend it. Creating jobs, and putting mor epeople back to work. Steeling it for road to nowhere govt. projects hurts all of us eventually.

If taxes are reduced people have more to spend, and they will.

The monetary system only works if everyone wants to play along. If one man has 1 billion dollars and 1000 men only have 1 dollar the 1000 men are going to find a new monetary system to use.

It's really only paper and has no real life value.