noSpark wrote:
FM you done theoretical physics at uni?
He's learning how to repair toasters.Spark wrote:
FM you done theoretical physics at uni?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
lulz
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Absence of proof is not proof of absence but but amazing claims demand amazing evidence. You might as well say we are surrounded by invisible faeries unless you can prove otherwise.
Until evidence of a God is shown to me I will not pray at man made church.
Until evidence of a God is shown to me I will not pray at man made church.
I could have been repairing toasters for at least 8 years now. Stupid school system.
There is the concept of Anti-Christ, and I doubt God has forgiven Satan.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
The idea that God hates a particle, something he created, is absurd. Particularly when you are talking about a Judeo-Christian God, a forgiving God.
Ridiculous.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Ignoring the fact that religion cannot comprise anything more than the languages we have created to explain the things we see:
Physics explains everything that is worthwhile to know about the world around us. It is not useful to know anything physics does not show us.
Again, any language we create to explain the universe is only meaningful to us, not the universe. Start here and tell me how perfect our ' laws of physics are.Your statement is as absurd, or even more so than this. Both concepts stink with narcissism. One brand from foolish men who think the mysteries of creation and life can be explained by science and one brand from foolish men who take the Bible at face value.
So, if you accept God you have no self respect?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Get some fucking self-respect.
Wow.
If Satan wants to be forgiven he is.ATG wrote:
There is the concept of Anti-Christ, and I doubt God has forgiven Satan.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
The idea that God hates a particle, something he created, is absurd. Particularly when you are talking about a Judeo-Christian God, a forgiving God.
I never said our idea of physics is perfect. It's not even close.ATG wrote:
Ridiculous.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Ignoring the fact that religion cannot comprise anything more than the languages we have created to explain the things we see:
Physics explains everything that is worthwhile to know about the world around us. It is not useful to know anything physics does not show us.
Again, any language we create to explain the universe is only meaningful to us, not the universe. Start here and tell me how perfect our ' laws of physics are.Your statement is as absurd, or even more so than this. Both concepts stink with narcissism. One brand from foolish men who think the mysteries of creation and life can be explained by science and one brand from foolish men who take the Bible at face value.
The concept of creation is not worthwhile to know. People get hung up about it out of curiosity. Physics does not pretend to know anything about creation.
If you place an immortal or moral beings before yourself you have no self-respect.ATG wrote:
So, if you accept god you have no self respect?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Get some fucking self-respect.
Wow.
I guarantee you whatever scientists come up with it will never be as simplistic, nor as unjustifiable as "god did it".
And the example of physics being defied that you give isn't, really.
And mathematics, upon which physics is based, transcends beyond human experience or observation. One plus one will always equal two in the system of integers whether you like it or not.
And the example of physics being defied that you give isn't, really.
And mathematics, upon which physics is based, transcends beyond human experience or observation. One plus one will always equal two in the system of integers whether you like it or not.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Um... I thought the Higgs only explained the existence of mass but did not give a theoretical basis for the observable rest masses of the elementary particles?Kmarion wrote:
Some of the reasons we are attempting to observe it.
Or I might be completely off.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
Jesus Christ, moderators derailing. God help me and strike down the demons!
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Apologies.
Accepted.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Apologies.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
If scientists ever develop the "dooms day" device, they would flip the switch. They've done it in the past.
When the first nuclear detonation was set off, scientists had no idea if the nuclear reaction would cease, or envelope the universe and destroy everything in an unstoppable chain reaction which just grew as it hit another each atom.
They decided to fire it and see.
When the first nuclear detonation was set off, scientists had no idea if the nuclear reaction would cease, or envelope the universe and destroy everything in an unstoppable chain reaction which just grew as it hit another each atom.
They decided to fire it and see.
One of the flaws/advantages of human nature. Hunger for knowledge.AussieReaper wrote:
If scientists ever develop the "dooms day" device, they would flip the switch. They've done it in the past.
When the first nuclear detonation was set off, scientists had no idea if the nuclear reaction would cease, or envelope the universe and destroy everything in an unstoppable chain reaction which just grew as it hit another each atom.
They decided to fire it and see.
3930K | H100i | RIVF | 16GB DDR3 | GTX 480 | AX750 | 800D | 512GB SSD | 3TB HDD | Xonar DX | W8
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
I am relatively certain the blast was bigger than expected...AussieReaper wrote:
When the first nuclear detonation was set off, scientists had no idea if the nuclear reaction would cease, or envelope the universe and destroy everything in an unstoppable chain reaction which just grew as it hit another each atom.
They decided to fire it and see.
It's pretty obvious why the reaction isn't sustainable, it's why you need the very dense material. I do not think the scientists had any interest in dying.
Even if it were possible to kill the Earth in one fell swoop (I'm sure most of us have seen the "how hard to really kill the Earth" sites) that is a pretty self-destructive mechanism you're claiming scientists have.
Except projects like these provide jobs.ATG wrote:
Seems like, considering all the failing government services worldwide, the destitute people and failing businesses and robbed pensions that we could find something better to expend resources on.
Fuck Israel
The money would be better spent cleaning up the great garbage patch.Dilbert_X wrote:
Except projects like these provide jobs.ATG wrote:
Seems like, considering all the failing government services worldwide, the destitute people and failing businesses and robbed pensions that we could find something better to expend resources on.
Someone should prolly call Robert Langdon, this has roots deep into Vatican City ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
Oh and btw: The hadron collider is operating at about 10TeV, right? So any "black holes" it creates will have a mass of about 10TeV/c2. That's 1.8 x 10^-24 kg or one sextillionth of a gram. Now I see plenty of things around me bigger than one sextillionth of a gram and they don't seem to be destroying the world to me.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
no uSpark wrote:
Oh and btw: The hadron collider is operating at about 10TeV, right? So any "black holes" it creates will have a mass of about 10TeV/c2. That's 1.8 x 10^-24 kg or one sextillionth of a gram. Now I see plenty of things around me bigger than one sextillionth of a gram and they don't seem to be destroying the world to me.
Black holes don't have a mass. Silly Spark.
ATG, I ask you again, are you ignorant enough to claim to KNOW that there is a god?
watAussieReaper wrote:
Black holes don't have a mass. Silly Spark.
The paradox is only a conflict between reality and your feeling what reality ought to be.
~ Richard Feynman
~ Richard Feynman
What physicist / scientist has ever said that physics explains everything?ATG wrote:
You can think physics explains everything, but in fact it explains nothing more than what we think we know according to the languages we have created to try and explain the things we see.