Time to move out, the government will carry me!

2009-10-15 05:12:02

#1

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5873

I was thinking about this earlier today and realized that I have zero incentive to actually contribute to society .

Now at the end of the 4 years of school I'm taking I'm going to end up with $40000+ in student loans, which is great. Since my parents make way over the cut off for Government College Aid I have to take out loans since they want their money up front every semester.

But I could instead move out of my house into a small apartment, spend like half of my income on just rent and end up being able to get a bunch of government social program money that'll not only help my survive but at the same time they'll pay for my school since I just made myself poor.

Now considering I have a choice between putting myself $40,000+ in debt or taking government money to pay for my school, why exactly should I or hell anyone else actually contribute if we'll get a free ride?

Damn it meant will carry not with. O well typos happen.

Last edited by Macbeth (2009-10-15 05:13:36)

2009-10-15 05:15:18

#2

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

the government with carry me!

Um... "will" ?

You're doing what course at college?

2009-10-15 05:15:52

#3

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5873

AussieReaper wrote:
the government with carry me!
Um... "will" ?

You're doing what course at college?

See edit, typos happen.

2009-10-15 05:17:24

#4

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

You're government assistance will not pay for $40,000 in student fees. You'll get some rent assistance. Help with paying utilities. That should be about it. You're better off not exploiting the system, since it's not going to really benefit you anyway.

Also, do you need that $40,000 up front or to be paid off + interests at the end? How does your student fees work in the US?

2009-10-15 05:18:34

#5

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6938|USA

Macbeth wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
the government with carry me!
Um... "will" ?

You're doing what course at college?
See edit, typos happen.

Forgive him,grammar and spelling corrections is what they must resort to, since they can not argue their point

2009-10-15 05:20:10

#6

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5873

AussieReaper wrote:
You're government assistance will not pay for $40,000 in student fees. You'll get some rent assistance. Help with paying utilities. That should be about it. You're better off not exploiting the system, since it's not going to really benefit you anyway.

Also, do you need that $40,000 up front or to be paid off + interests at the end? How does your student fees work in the US?

The U.S. Federal ov will put up around $3000 per semester, plus NJ will put up some money too. Rent assistance plus welfare and other state and local incentives.

2009-10-15 05:20:27

#7

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6936

When you say move out of your house, you mean you live with your parents right now? I don't quite understand this, why don't poor people just get given loans like everyone else?

2009-10-15 05:20:31

#8

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

lowing wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
Um... "will" ?

You're doing what course at college?
See edit, typos happen.
Forgive him,grammar and spelling corrections is what they must resort to, since they can not argue their point

Yeah, ignore lowing.

He's so petty he won't notice my other posts in the topic or even the question I asked in that first post, asking what course you are doing.

2009-10-15 05:23:19

#9

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5873

ghettoperson wrote:
When you say move out of your house, you mean you live with your parents right now? I don't quite understand this, why don't poor people just get given loans like everyone else?

Yup live with the parents, student loans pay out per semester not all at once.

I'm making the point as the system is designed now, there is no point in trying to actually work for what you get when the government will just give it to you if your poor enough.

2009-10-15 05:24:34

#10

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

Macbeth wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
You're government assistance will not pay for $40,000 in student fees. You'll get some rent assistance. Help with paying utilities. That should be about it. You're better off not exploiting the system, since it's not going to really benefit you anyway.

Also, do you need that $40,000 up front or to be paid off + interests at the end? How does your student fees work in the US?
The U.S. Federal ov will put up around $3000 per semester, plus NJ will put up some money too. Rent assistance plus welfare and other state and local incentives.

Not sure how hard is will be to claim on all those. We're given rent assistance here if we move out and have to juggle a low income job and/or student fee's. But our major student fees (mines about $30,000 AU) don't get charged until we're actually earning a decent income and even then it's interest free with just a small percentage of your pay taken.

But $3000 for a 6 month period isn't going to go far if you're not living with your parents and have to pay rent, food, utilities, transport, textbooks, list goes on...

2009-10-15 05:24:58

#11

FatherTed: xD; +3,936|6787|so randum

Why wouldn't you live off the state when you don't have to?

I dont know, something regarding morals maybe?

As this is posted by a conservative, clearly all you conservatives are spineless fucks that live off the state with no regard to their common man.

Last edited by FatherTed (2009-10-15 05:25:12)

Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella

2009-10-15 05:26:05

#12

ghettoperson: Member; +1,943|6936

Macbeth wrote:
ghettoperson wrote:
When you say move out of your house, you mean you live with your parents right now? I don't quite understand this, why don't poor people just get given loans like everyone else?
Yup live with the parents, student loans pay out per semester not all at once.

I'm making the point as the system is designed now, there is no point in trying to actually work for what you get when the government will just give it to you if your poor enough.

But how much of that is accurate, and how much is you ranting, but not providing any facts? How much money would you get from the government?

2009-10-15 05:27:33

#13

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5873

AussieReaper wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
You're government assistance will not pay for $40,000 in student fees. You'll get some rent assistance. Help with paying utilities. That should be about it. You're better off not exploiting the system, since it's not going to really benefit you anyway.

Also, do you need that $40,000 up front or to be paid off + interests at the end? How does your student fees work in the US?
The U.S. Federal ov will put up around $3000 per semester, plus NJ will put up some money too. Rent assistance plus welfare and other state and local incentives.
Not sure how hard is will be to claim on all those. We're given rent assistance here if we move out and have to juggle a low income job and/or student fee's. But our major student fees (mines about $30,000 AU) don't get charged until we're actually earning a decent income and even then it's interest free with just a small percentage of your pay taken.

But $3000 for a 6 month period isn't going to go far if you're not living with your parents and have to pay rent, food, utilities, transport, textbooks, list goes on...

State covers transport with very cheap bus passes for all enrolled. The state as well as the school offers to pay a bit for low income students, Welfare and rent assitence would cover rent and food. Move into low income housing and the Utilities would be cheap or if I'm lucky covered by the state.

2009-10-15 05:30:42

#14

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6938|USA

AussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
Macbeth wrote:

See edit, typos happen.
Forgive him,grammar and spelling corrections is what they must resort to, since they can not argue their point
Yeah, ignore lowing.

He's so petty he won't notice my other posts in the topic or even the question I asked in that first post, asking what course you are doing.

Your post was a smart ass comment about his college courses while correcting his post. If you had a valid point to the topic at hand I missed it, although i admit, since you never have any valid points, I wasn't even really looking.

2009-10-15 05:31:59

#15

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

Macbeth wrote:
State covers transport with very cheap bus passes for all enrolled. The state as well as the school offers to pay a bit for low income students, Welfare and rent assitence would cover rent and food. Move into low income housing and the Utilities would be cheap or if I'm lucky covered by the state.

Ah, see now you need some luck on your side.

Do you think you could live on $3000 over a 6 month period, all on your own?

That's only $500 per month.

You have to pay for all of that on like $125 per week.

If you think that's a cake walk then by all means.

You've got it much easier staying with your parents and getting a job than leeching.

2009-10-15 05:33:17

#16

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

lowing wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
Forgive him,grammar and spelling corrections is what they must resort to, since they can not argue their point
Yeah, ignore lowing.

He's so petty he won't notice my other posts in the topic or even the question I asked in that first post, asking what course you are doing.

Your post was a smart ass comment about his college courses while correcting his post. If you had a valid point to the topic at hand I missed it, although i admit, since you never have any valid points, I wasn't even really looking.

Yeah, and obviously have continued to ignore any other valid points in the thread, or even offered any of your own....

2009-10-15 05:36:28

#17

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6393|eXtreme to the maX

Seems like a no-brainer - just be sure it is.
Plus you'll never repay $40,000 with a pol sci degree.

If it annoys lowing it has to be worth it.

Pro-tip: Pan-handling.

Fuck Israel

2009-10-15 05:36:55

#18

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6908|London, England

I guess the valid point would be either that by subsidising education that's better for the country in the long run. The second point would be how much would they subsidise your education and whether you really know the full details of it all before you pack your suitcase.

2009-10-15 05:47:35

#19

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6938|USA

AussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:

Yeah, ignore lowing.

He's so petty he won't notice my other posts in the topic or even the question I asked in that first post, asking what course you are doing.

Your post was a smart ass comment about his college courses while correcting his post. If you had a valid point to the topic at hand I missed it, although i admit, since you never have any valid points, I wasn't even really looking.
Yeah, and obviously have continued to ignore any other valid points in the thread, or even offered any of your own....

My post was directly under your bullshit and was relevant to your smart ass posting.

I do not need to add to this thread, the OP speaks for itself. there is no justifying it or defending it. It shows what is wrong with a system that rewards failure and punishes achievement.

2009-10-15 05:48:59

#20

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5873

AR the 3000 would be just for Education. Everything else is added on top of that.

2009-10-15 05:50:33

#21

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

Macbeth wrote:
AR the 3000 would be just for Education. Everything else is added on top of that.

Work out the numbers you'd be getting and then come back to us.

I really doubt it would be in your benefit to move out and pay for everything on welfare/state assistance.

2009-10-15 05:52:00

#22

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6908|London, England

lowing wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
lowing wrote:

Your post was a smart ass comment about his college courses while correcting his post. If you had a valid point to the topic at hand I missed it, although i admit, since you never have any valid points, I wasn't even really looking.
Yeah, and obviously have continued to ignore any other valid points in the thread, or even offered any of your own....
My post was directly under your bullshit and was relevant to your smart ass posting.

I do not need to add to this thread, the OP speaks for itself. there is no justifying it or defending it. It shows what is wrong with a system that rewards failure and punishes achievement.

You are seeing Government subsidies towards education as rewarding failure and punishing achievement, others see it as giving some people a chance to succeed where they could not before. It's not even a complicated subject really, I'd have thought everyone could see the benefits of governments doing stuff like this.

2009-10-15 05:58:49

#23

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6938|USA

The man has a choice, pay his own way, or become poor (a failure) and let the govt. pay his way. What would most people do, it is obvious.

This is what I mean by rewarding failure and punishing success, also govt. dependency. It is clear.

Last edited by lowing (2009-10-15 05:59:44)

2009-10-15 06:06:02

#24

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6440|what

lowing wrote:
The man has a choice, pay his own way, or become poor (a failure) and let the govt. pay his way. What would most people do, it is obvious.

This is what I mean by rewarding failure and punishing success, also govt. dependency. It is clear.

Can you offer any solution to those who genuinely need this assistance, or do you just hate welfare because people like Macbeth think it's in their benefit to exploit it and do so?

2009-10-15 06:11:11

#25

Ty: Mass Media Casualty; +2,398|7061|Noizyland

It's not even exploitation, it's working the system. And it's cyclical too. When MacBeth has his degree and is paying tax from his income earned in part due to his government-supported degree he wil be paying for future MacBeths to get government support for their degrees.

[Blinking eyes thing]
Steam: http://steamcommunity.com/id/tzyon

BF2S Forums Time to move out, the government will carry me!

AussieReaper wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

ghettoperson wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

lowing wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

lowing wrote:

lowing wrote:

Board footer