BF2S Forums EE Chat - August

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

ColCarnage wrote:

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=129094 wat

Ban.

The real question is why was Mek gone from the forums for a week?  That's highly unlike him.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

ColCarnage wrote:

http://forums.bf2s.com/viewtopic.php?id=129094 wat

Ban.

The real question is why was Mek gone from the forums for a week?  That's highly unlike him.

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2009-08-12 11:09:44)

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Hey BF2s, it's been 3 years since I registered on this pathetic excuse for a website.

Do I win prize?

Last edited by SEREMAKER (2009-08-12 11:23:10)

DrunkFace wrote:

SEREMAKER wrote:

Doctor Strangelove wrote:

Hey BF2s, it's been 3 years since I registered on this pathetic excuse for a website.

Do I win prize?

http://msp88.photobucket.com/albums/k20 … pDance.gif

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s126 … hatAss.gif

Racist, I never got one.

ColCarnage wrote:

Mekstizzle wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Ban.

The real question is why was Mek gone from the forums for a week?  That's highly unlike him.

What you talking bout, awhile back in May/June I was also gone for awhile.

Can you just leave already no one likes you

ig wrote:

ig wrote:

wat

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Ban.

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Holy shit!!! I just found out Quantic is playing in OC this Sunday.  Yessssss!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AvP1atLBuo

Awesome.

Lai wrote:

Ioan92 wrote:

Bradt3hleader wrote:

Yeah because they don't use them. jk

If you clean an M16A4 every now and then it's fine. It's not like the M16s in Vietnam.

I'd rather have a rifle that I could fuck down the barrel like the HK416 and keep shooting it instead of having to clean an M16 after DURING each battle.

Man, I'm starting to feel for the Marines

Fixed 4 U

Seriously though, I don't know whether Diemaco's are less prone to jamming, I guess they still are at least to a certain extend as the fouling of the bolt is inherent to the basic AR15 design. I know the talk regarding maintenance about proper American Army discipline compared to sloppy Russian conscripts, the point is that it's just not realistic. A soldier might hit the ground and his rifle will get muddy or not have time to properly maintain his weapon for one or more days. Sure, it doesn't always jam and it certainly doesn't jam as much as they used too, nor are even AK's fully jamproof; the thing is you never know for sure when they are going to jam so you want you chances of jamming to be as small as possible.

I know of Dutch second line troops who had their Uzi's replaced by Diemaco C8 Carbines and weren't too happy even though from a tactical perspective a M4 is far superior to an Uzi. The Uzi was developped to withstand Levantine sands, you could wipe your ass with it and it would still work. The same C8's were also issued to the KCT (Corps Commando Troops), but have been in service for scarcely more than a decade. As soon as they saw real action (Afghanistan, Uruzgan province) they were discarded and replaced by HK416's. IMO the Dutch should have kept their old FAL's, as the British should have, who are even worse of with their SA85's.

Little BaBy JESUS wrote:

From what i've heard. the AH-64 and Aussie Tiger perform very similarly. AH-64 kind wins in the armament area, but the Tiger is far easier in terms logistics and is also also far cheaper. So i think it was probably a economic decision.

Isn't the Tigr also EMP proof, or was that an imagined feature ascribed purely for Goldeneye?