How is it that gays are doing it at your expense, but that straight people aren't doing the same?
Dilbert_X wrote:I can see the benefit of subsidising families, but not gays so one can play 'house' at my expense.
A more neutral system would be better, I am sick of being taxed to hell and seeing no return.
Your bias seems rather blatant here. Unless of course, you're suggesting that straight couples who adopt shouldn't get tax subsidies.
Under that system, I guess it would suck to be infertile.