"The Fall of Capitalism and the Rise of Islam," at a posh Hilton hotel in a suburb of Chicago.
Last edited by SEREMAKER (2009-07-17 08:11:06)
Pages: 1 2
Last edited by SEREMAKER (2009-07-17 08:11:06)
Last edited by CapnNismo (2009-07-17 09:45:21)
And that would be a problem why?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Good thing its not in the south. Judging by the IQs in my area, no doubt a couple of bubbas would waltz in with ARs/AKs.
This.Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:
And that would be a problem why?The_Sniper_NM wrote:
Good thing its not in the south. Judging by the IQs in my area, no doubt a couple of bubbas would waltz in with ARs/AKs.
Well if it is war they are want, and we know where and when they are meeting, go there and shoot the fuckers dead. Meeting adjourned.
I think moderates can continue to ignore loud-mouthed individuals, yourself included, for quite a while to come.lowing wrote:
I wonder just how many of these infinite "just a few" examples it will take to be recognized by the pacifists/appeasers as something that needs be of concern.
I do not see anything wrong with the article. They give links to the website, links to leaflet, etc. I do not understand what you are trying to say. I did not want to say anything but I noticed your one line "hearts and minds" response in another thread. You sound like just another mouthpiece spouting off old one liners in an attempt to be cool or something.AussieReaper wrote:
We report. You decide.
Last edited by Red Forman (2009-07-18 03:59:05)
Is it working?Red Forman wrote:
I do not see anything wrong with the article. They give links to the website, links to leaflet, etc. I do not understand what you are trying to say. I did not want to say anything but I noticed your one line "hearts and minds" response in another thread. You sound like just another mouthpiece spouting off old one liners in an attempt to be cool or something.AussieReaper wrote:
We report. You decide.
you speak of individuals, I speak of a religion.mikkel wrote:
I think moderates can continue to ignore loud-mouthed individuals, yourself included, for quite a while to come.lowing wrote:
I wonder just how many of these infinite "just a few" examples it will take to be recognized by the pacifists/appeasers as something that needs be of concern.
He is always like that, it is a result of not actually having an argument to support his bullshit.Red Forman wrote:
I do not see anything wrong with the article. They give links to the website, links to leaflet, etc. I do not understand what you are trying to say. I did not want to say anything but I noticed your one line "hearts and minds" response in another thread. You sound like just another mouthpiece spouting off old one liners in an attempt to be cool or something.AussieReaper wrote:
We report. You decide.
Like the freedom of speech in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution?lowing wrote:
He is always like that, it is a result of not actually having an argument to support his bullshit.Red Forman wrote:
I do not see anything wrong with the article. They give links to the website, links to leaflet, etc. I do not understand what you are trying to say. I did not want to say anything but I noticed your one line "hearts and minds" response in another thread. You sound like just another mouthpiece spouting off old one liners in an attempt to be cool or something.AussieReaper wrote:
We report. You decide.
Last edited by AussieReaper (2009-07-18 07:32:38)
I see, so you dismiss the OP as covered by freedom of speech? ooooooooooooooooook.AussieReaper wrote:
Like the freedom of speech in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution?lowing wrote:
He is always like that, it is a result of not actually having an argument to support his bullshit.Red Forman wrote:
I do not see anything wrong with the article. They give links to the website, links to leaflet, etc. I do not understand what you are trying to say. I did not want to say anything but I noticed your one line "hearts and minds" response in another thread. You sound like just another mouthpiece spouting off old one liners in an attempt to be cool or something.
Yeah my arguments are just as baseless.
Say are these Muslims, who are American, protected by the American constitution or are they not?lowing wrote:
I see, so you dismiss the OP as covered by freedom of speech? ooooooooooooooooook.AussieReaper wrote:
Like the freedom of speech in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution?lowing wrote:
He is always like that, it is a result of not actually having an argument to support his bullshit.
Yeah my arguments are just as baseless.
I guess I was right in calling your arguments bullshit. appreciate ya proving that for me.
nope not these, sedition, and treason, inciting to riot, aiding the enemy, are not normally covered by the constitution. Contrary to your bullshit, you simply do not have the "right" to say or do whatever you want.AussieReaper wrote:
Say are these Muslims, who are American, protected by the American constitution or are they not?lowing wrote:
I see, so you dismiss the OP as covered by freedom of speech? ooooooooooooooooook.AussieReaper wrote:
Like the freedom of speech in the First Amendment to the United States Constitution?
Yeah my arguments are just as baseless.
I guess I was right in calling your arguments bullshit. appreciate ya proving that for me.
Pages: 1 2