(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
This story isn't getting the attention it most definitely deserves, across the major media network.
There is something very sinister happening in our executive branch at the moment. The truth need to come out.

news.yahoo.com wrote:

WASHINGTON – An inspector general fired by President Barack Obama said Friday he acted "with the highest integrity" in investigating AmeriCorps and other government-funded national service programs. Gerald Walpin said in an interview with The Associated Press that he reported facts and conclusions "in an honest and full way" while serving as inspector general at the Corporation for National and Community Service.

In a letter to Congress on Thursday, Obama said he had lost confidence in Walpin and was removing him from the position.

Walpin defended his work on Friday. "I know that I and my office acted with the highest integrity as an independent inspector general should act," he said.

Obama's move follows an investigation by Walpin finding misuse of federal grants by a nonprofit education group led by Sacramento Mayor Kevin Johnson, who is an Obama supporter and former NBA basketball star. Johnson and a nonprofit education academy he founded ultimately agree to repay half of $847,000 in grants it had received from AmeriCorps.

Walpin was criticized by the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento for the way he handled the investigation of Johnson and St. HOPE Academy.

"It is vital that I have the fullest confidence in the appointees serving as inspectors general," Obama said in the letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Vice President Joe Biden, who also serves as president of the Senate. "That is no longer the case with regard to this inspector general."

The president didn't offer any more explanation, but White House Counsel Gregory Craig, in a letter late Thursday to Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, cited the U.S. attorney's criticism of Walpin to an integrity committee for inspectors general.

washingtonexaminer wrote:

The White House's decision to fire AmeriCorps inspector general Gerald Walpin came amid politically-charged tensions inside the Corporation for National and Community Service, the organization that runs AmeriCorps.  Top executives at the Corporation, Walpin explained in an hour-long interview Saturday, were unhappy with his investigation into the misuse of AmeriCorps funds by Kevin Johnson, the former NBA star who is now mayor of Sacramento, California and a prominent supporter of President Obama. Walpin's investigation also sparked conflict with the acting U.S. attorney in Sacramento amid fears that the probe -- which could have resulted in Johnson being barred from ever winning another federal grant -- might stand in the way of the city receiving its part of billions of dollars in federal stimulus money.  After weeks of standoff, Walpin, whose position as inspector general is supposed to be protected from influence by political appointees and the White House, was fired.

Walpin learned his fate Wednesday night.  He was driving to an event in upstate New York when he received a call from Norman Eisen, the Special Counsel to the President for Ethics and Government Reform.  "He said, 'Mr. Walpin, the president wants me to tell you that he really appreciates your service, but it's time to move on,'" Walpin recalls.  "Eisen said, 'You can either resign, or I'll tell you that we'll have to terminate you.'"

At that moment, Walpin says, he had finished not only a report on the Sacramento probe but also an investigation into extensive misuse of AmeriCorps money by the City University of New York, which is AmeriCorps' biggest program.  Walpin says he told Eisen that, given those two investigations, neither of which was well-received by top Corporation management, the timing of his firing seemed "very interesting."  According to Walpin, Eisen said it was "pure coincidence."  When Walpin asked for some time to consider what to do, Eisen gave him one hour. "Then he called back in 45 minutes and asked for my response," Walpin recalls.

The method of Walpin's firing could be a violation of the 2008 Inspectors General Reform Act, which requires the president to give Congress 30 days' notice, plus an explanation of cause, before firing an inspector general.  Then-Sen. Barack Obama was a co-sponsor of that legislation. In the case of Walpin, Eisen's efforts to force Walpin to resign could be seen as an effort to push Walpin out of his job so that the White House would not have to go through the 30-day process or give a reason for its action.  When Walpin refused to quit, the White House informed Congress and began the 30-day countdown.
Ironic thing is, then Senator B. Obama, sponsored the following legislation relating to the Inspector Generals Reform Act of 2008... Humm now as President he is above the law? Not giving a reason and 30 day notice to the Senate and House? Srs WTF?

SEC. 3. REMOVAL OF INSPECTORS GENERAL.
(a) ESTABLISHMENTS.—Section 3(b) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting ‘‘If an Inspector General is removed from office or is transferred to another position or location within an establishment, the President shall communicate in writing the reasons for any such removal or transfer to both Houses of Congress, not later than 30 days before the removal or transfer. Nothing in this subsection shall prohibit a personnel action otherwise authorized by law, other than transfer or removal.’’.

I will be following this, hope to hear your thoughts, too.
13rin
Member
+977|6777
He lost his confidence in the man because he doesn't dance to Obama's drum.   If the man won't turn a blind eye, then he'll find someone who will.  It'll probably be a hispanic woman because they can reach better decisions than a old white man.
I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something.  - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
I guess all the bf2s Obama supporters have a blind eye too
mcjagdflieger
Champion of Dueling Rectums
+26|6608|South Jersey
Less and less baahing from the sheep as the truth comes out tbh. I asked my roommate, who voted for Oface, to answer yes or no if she approves of what he has done so far. She said she hasn't been following what he's done after the election. FFS people dont even care, they just voted for a dem cuz they hate repubs. NOT THE CORRECT WAY TO VOTE FOR POTUS PEOPLE. There are and need to be more (capable) candidates. Fuck you all.
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
So where the hell are all you OBAMA SUPPORTERS? WOULD YOU LIKE TO VOICE YOUR OPINION ?
ghettoperson
Member
+1,943|6947

Free ig.
mcjagdflieger
Champion of Dueling Rectums
+26|6608|South Jersey
Unbelievable.
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
just the peaceful sound of crickets

Ahhh
Ioan92
Member
+337|6020

ghettoperson wrote:

Free gs.
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
Update with vid sans text wall
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6703|North Carolina
Hey, where were you guys when Bush was firing federal attorneys for political reasons?
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
Great question Turq. Bush gave teh Atty Gen and Congress reasons.

No one even wants to touch this here, it really makes me wonder why. Especially since Pres. Obama co-sponsored the bill. Ill just have to wait for the Congress woman, McCaskell,  to add her thoughts. She wrote the bill and is pissed. She also wants answers; She is one of Pres. Obama's biggest and earliest supporters.
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7014
There will be no questioning of the Messiah by the ig... Walpin is not going quietly though...and i say.... good for him for sticking up for his rights...
He didn't drink the koolaid... 

and on a side note... here is a little chart that compares Bushes deficits to the Messiahs deficits...
https://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b90/catbox777/obamadebt.jpg

Last edited by [TUF]Catbox (2009-06-18 23:00:45)

Love is the answer
(T)eflon(S)hadow
R.I.P. Neda
+456|7127|Grapevine, TX
^^ that chart makes me want to cry knowing the damage will take a long time to recoup and move back in the the black.

According to an unscientific online poll conducted by CNN’s Lou Dobbs, Americans aren’t buying President Obama’s recent firing of AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin.

Obama now says he fired Walpin because he was confused and disoriented. But 94% of the voters in Dobbs’ poll indicate that they want to see the affair investigated.

94% of CNN viewers don’t believe Obama?

Jeez, that’s a headline right there.


Source: Lou Dobbs
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7034|Salt Lake City

While I'm far happier that O won over McCain and that douchebag Palin, this certainly doesn't fly with his campaign promises.  He's starting to sound more like "The Decider".  Congress should call him on it.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6949|USA

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

While I'm far happier that O won over McCain and that douchebag Palin, this certainly doesn't fly with his campaign promises.  He's starting to sound more like "The Decider".  Congress should call him on it.
and yet you are glad he won.....go figure.
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7034|Salt Lake City

lowing wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

While I'm far happier that O won over McCain and that douchebag Palin, this certainly doesn't fly with his campaign promises.  He's starting to sound more like "The Decider".  Congress should call him on it.
and yet you are glad he won.....go figure.
The alternative would have been worse.
lowing
Banned
+1,662|6949|USA

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

While I'm far happier that O won over McCain and that douchebag Palin, this certainly doesn't fly with his campaign promises.  He's starting to sound more like "The Decider".  Congress should call him on it.
and yet you are glad he won.....go figure.
The alternative would have been worse.
Worse? how so?
Agent_Dung_Bomb
Member
+302|7034|Salt Lake City

lowing wrote:

Agent_Dung_Bomb wrote:

lowing wrote:


and yet you are glad he won.....go figure.
The alternative would have been worse.
Worse? how so?
McCain would have left it to the states, but he would have gotten pressure from Palin, the Evangelicals, and other Republicans to amend the Constitution to define marriage, and thus ban gay marriage.  I agree with McCain on this one, but I don't want the VP pushing to change our Constitution in a manner that discriminates against anyone.

McCain was a major backer of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act which took away depression era regulation of banking, investment, and insurance companies.  It was this deregulation that allowed AIG to get into the trouble they are in now.  During his campaign he said he now thinks WS needs to be regulated, but as this very thread points out, what politicians say to get elected and what they actually do are often not the same thing.  Since the Repubs are the ones most often asking for deregulation, I find it unlikely that he would actually do it.

I don't like McCain for not backing the proposal to improve the GI Bill package.  The reason he gave wasn't about the money, but said it was a disincentive for military personnel to become commissioned officers; in other words don't get an education and leave the military for a better career. To me this just reeked of saying, "Don't get educated, because we need to keep enough non-educated people to do the grunt work of fighting on the front lines."

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard