If you don't want to get shot or beat by the police don't run.
That's your government, not mine.Macbeth wrote:
lol just saw that 5 minutes ago. Once again.If you don't want to get shot or beat by the police don't run.
They knew and they didn't care because they have useful idiots in the public who will say it is okay.Kmarion wrote:
The K-9 unit really didn't do anything wrong tbh.
btw I think they had to know they were on TV.
Hey, you folks elected them! Don't blame the cops for having their hands tied by policy regarding illegals.ATG wrote:
That's your government, not mine.Macbeth wrote:
lol just saw that 5 minutes ago. Once again.If you don't want to get shot or beat by the police don't run.
I say hang the cops and the feds that allow illegal aliens in.
Fine, then maybe the cops shouldn't arrest the fuckers and waste our tax money and just shoot them in the back of the head.imortal wrote:
Hey, you folks elected them! Don't blame the cops for having their hands tied by policy regarding illegals.ATG wrote:
That's your government, not mine.Macbeth wrote:
lol just saw that 5 minutes ago. Once again.
I say hang the cops and the feds that allow illegal aliens in.
Macbeth wrote:
If you don't want to get shot or beat by the police don't run.
Last edited by jsnipy (2009-05-13 22:42:47)
They have very specific commands. I doubt the "bite" even came close to breaking the skin. The guys kicking an punching the fella that almost killed two people.. yea, they lost control of their emotions.ATG wrote:
They knew and they didn't care because they have useful idiots in the public who will say it is okay.Kmarion wrote:
The K-9 unit really didn't do anything wrong tbh.
btw I think they had to know they were on TV.
When A guy is spread eagle face down on the ground, why did they have to let the dog in to have a bite?
Yes, and the illegals are breaking the law just by being in our country. The problem has two forms. Proper law is to deport them, where they just turn around and come back in. The other problem is that the elected people in charge choose to keep the police from enforcing the law by deporting illegals, creating a more friendly enviroment to kepp all the illegals around. The elected officials do this bercause they fear losing votes from the hispanic community.ATG wrote:
Fine, then maybe the cops shouldn't arrest the fuckers and waste our tax money and just shoot them in the back of the head.imortal wrote:
Hey, you folks elected them! Don't blame the cops for having their hands tied by policy regarding illegals.ATG wrote:
That's your government, not mine.
I say hang the cops and the feds that allow illegal aliens in.
EXCEPT THIS IS A COUNTRY BASED UPON THE RULE OF LAW GODDAMNIT
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me … 7883.storyLt. Chuck Carlson of the El Monte Police Department said his officers made the arrest, and the internal affairs department is investigating the incident. Carlson said internal affairs will review video of the incident and also take statements from officers.
Carlson said Rodriguez, who was a parolee at large, had served time in state prison for an unspecified drug charge and was a member of the El Monte Flores street gang.
Rodriguez was taken to Greater El Monte Community Hospital. It's unclear whether his injuries were sustained by an earlier car crash or from the blow to the head.
...so you say. If I accept your argument that the beatings are 'de facto policy,' shouldn't the ones to be held accountable be the police administrators? If you start kicking out the policy makers, you start to actully change the policy.ATG wrote:
One may lose his emotion and get a pass.
When there are two officers are beating the bastard it becomes de facto policy.
It becomes policy when the police deny the public access to information until well after a crime by police has been committed, at which time the police are routinely exonerated.imortal wrote:
...so you say. If I accept your argument that the beatings are 'de facto policy,' shouldn't the ones to be held accountable be the police administrators? If you start kicking out the policy makers, you start to actully change the policy.ATG wrote:
One may lose his emotion and get a pass.
When there are two officers are beating the bastard it becomes de facto policy.
Actually the one you didn't hear about was a chase that was only 30 minutes apart. A murder/carjacking suspect was apprehended without high fives/kick to the head.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
for all you guys know the guy could've just raped and murdered some innocent little kid
socal and ATL seem to have an inordinate amountcowami wrote:
only in socal
It is really very simple. If you don't like the way things are run, change it by changing the administration. If your head law enforcement officials are not elected, the people who hire and fire them ARE. That whole 'get out and vote' thing works for more than just figuring out which useless figurehead sits in the White House.ATG wrote:
It becomes policy when the police deny the public access to information until well after a crime by police has been committed, at which time the police are routinely exonerated.imortal wrote:
...so you say. If I accept your argument that the beatings are 'de facto policy,' shouldn't the ones to be held accountable be the police administrators? If you start kicking out the policy makers, you start to actully change the policy.ATG wrote:
One may lose his emotion and get a pass.
When there are two officers are beating the bastard it becomes de facto policy.
Such as this.
Or this.
At the point when case after case starts with a crime, has an ugly interlude of a police smackdown or hail of bullets, and ends with the officers being cleared we can observe a pattern.
But, I believe nobody will have the last laugh. When the preordained bankruptsy of california happens the many, many state workers will have to have their most generous pensions renegotiated.
The state cannot sustain a system wherein some bastard works for 20 years and then gets 80-90% of his salary for the rest of his life. When these entitlements have to be cut, there will be chaos and anarchy. Somebody a week from retirement finds out he gets little or no pension because the state is broke will be mad as hell. They will then join the growing ranks of the formerly middle class who live their lives in a fit of near riot.
What happens when your unemployement benefits expire and you can't get a job and you lose your home and your car because there is little to no work ( discounting peon jobs paying poverty wages that do not sustain a family like retail clerk or fastfood ffs )? The police still get their pensions.
What happens when the state can no longer function as an economy because the government has incited so much financial terror that nobody is spending any real money.
/rant.