comment?
Poll
Who is the more dominant athlete in their sport?
| Alexander Mikhaylovich Ovechkin | 52% | 52% - 10 | ||||
| LeBron Raymone James | 47% | 47% - 9 | ||||
| Total: 19 | ||||||
Neither. Tiger Woods.
meh golf, Tiger Woods is overhyped. Ovethkin and LeBron James would beat Woods in a street fight so u cant use T. Woods.GravyDan wrote:
Neither. Tiger Woods.
Last edited by blademaster (2009-05-05 11:48:27)
Who the fuck are they?
And what 'sport' do they play?
And what 'sport' do they play?
Kerri Walsh?
"people in ny have a general idea of how to drive. one of the pedals goes forward the other one prevents you from dying"
A proficient sniper could take out both Ovethkin and James. What's your point? I just answered the question...blademaster wrote:
meh golf, Tiger Woods is overhyped. Ovethkin and LeBron James would beat Woods in a street fight so u cant use T. Woods.GravyDan wrote:
Neither. Tiger Woods.
Ovechkin because basketballs a wussy sport.
indeedFrankieSpankie3388 wrote:
Ovechkin because basketballs a wussy sport.
the point is that those 2 guys can beat up T. Woods so u cant use T. Woods he is irrelevant.... in this thread. Since golf players are wussies.GravyDan wrote:
A proficient sniper could take out both Ovethkin and James. What's your point? I just answered the question...blademaster wrote:
meh golf, Tiger Woods is overhyped. Ovethkin and LeBron James would beat Woods in a street fight so u cant use T. Woods.GravyDan wrote:
Neither. Tiger Woods.
What a pointless thread...
And you base you assumption on....?blademaster wrote:
the point is that those 2 guys can beat up T. Woods so u cant use T. Woods he is irrelevant.... in this thread. Since golf players are wussies.GravyDan wrote:
A proficient sniper could take out both Ovethkin and James. What's your point? I just answered the question...blademaster wrote:
meh golf, Tiger Woods is overhyped. Ovethkin and LeBron James would beat Woods in a street fight so u cant use T. Woods.
Tiger is in phenomenal shape. He played 4 grueling days of high stress golf with a fucked up knee and a broken leg and he bloody well won.
The US economy is a giant Ponzi scheme. And 'to big to fail' is code speak for 'niahnahniahniahnah 99 percenters'
King James ffs
Plus he has a lot of iron clubs, I bet they'd help in a street fight.Stubbee wrote:
And you base you assumption on....?blademaster wrote:
the point is that those 2 guys can beat up T. Woods so u cant use T. Woods he is irrelevant.... in this thread. Since golf players are wussies.GravyDan wrote:
A proficient sniper could take out both Ovethkin and James. What's your point? I just answered the question...
Tiger is in phenomenal shape. He played 4 grueling days of high stress golf with a fucked up knee and a broken leg and he bloody well won.
New Thread: Who would win in a street fight? .....
Nature is a powerful force. Those who seek to subdue nature, never do so permanently.
Out of the two listed, LeBron is far more dominating. Ovechkin doesn't have an MVP, does he? That being said, neither of those listed are the most dominant in their sport. Ovechkin has been in the league what, 3 years? LeBron 6? Until their respective careers span more than 10 years and a majority of those years are played at the highest level, they aren't the most dominant.
That being said, Tiger Woods is by far the most dominant golfer in the world today.
That being said, Tiger Woods is by far the most dominant golfer in the world today.
OK, you got me Blade. Golf most certainly is a wussie sport. I change my answer to... Lance Armstrong! Go on ahead, try to demean a sport where you wear a penis shaped helmet and spandex. That's right, you can't. Plus, the guys name is Lance. I couldn't think of a more manly name if I snorted testosterone off a dead hooker.
By the way, Goofy from Disney on ice is more dominant than Ovechkin. And so long as Kobe keeps raping the NBA (and a few white women, but I think we all know he is entitled) then we can't exactly call LeBron dominating.
By the way, Goofy from Disney on ice is more dominant than Ovechkin. And so long as Kobe keeps raping the NBA (and a few white women, but I think we all know he is entitled) then we can't exactly call LeBron dominating.
Last edited by GravyDan (2009-05-05 15:35:26)