China and non existent animal rights

2009-05-02 15:38:20

#1

bogo24dk: Member; +26|6808

http://www.ptroa.co.il/petitionmovie/pe … nglish.php

How inhumane do you have to be before you can do something like this.

And we in the west are part to blame for this. Cause we allow products made of dog and cat hair in our shops.

Last edited by bogo24dk (2009-05-02 15:41:29)

2009-05-02 15:40:45

#2

krazed: Admiral of the Bathtub; +619|7081|Great Brown North

if you're raised around it and taught that it's right, you wouldn't have a problem with doing it either.

a petition isn't going to do shit to china, they don't care. short of going over there and cutting their hands off, there's nothing we can really do

2009-05-02 15:42:10

#3

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,983|6933|949

bogo24dk wrote:
http://www.ptroa.co.il/petitionmovie/petition-English.php

How inhumane do you have to be before you can do something like this.

While I respect "the people of Israel"s concern about animal welfare in China, they need to get a clue on human rights in that country first and foremost.

2009-05-02 15:53:09

#4

mafia996630: © 2009 Jeff Minard; +319|7065|d

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
they need to get a clue on human rights in that country first and foremost.

QFT.

But yeah its really sad how fuked up the animal rights are. I remember having this discussion a few years back though, anyone else remember ?

Last edited by mafia996630 (2009-05-02 15:53:31)

2009-05-02 16:00:19

#5

Doctor Strangelove: Real Battlefield Veterinarian.; +1,758|6770

It's even worse in Japan

2009-05-02 16:34:33

#6

nickb64: formerly from OC (it's EXACTLY like on tv)[truth]; +77|5912|Greatest Nation on Earth(USA)

bogo24dk wrote:
http://www.ptroa.co.il/petitionmovie/petition-English.php

How inhumane do you have to be before you can do something like this.

And we in the west are part to blame for this. Cause we allow products made of dog and cat hair in our shops.

Oh no.

They're just animals

/sarcasm

That sucks, but what can we really do about it, It's not like they're gonna change just 'cause we don't like it.

They don't give a shi-.

2009-05-02 16:38:40

#7

cl4u53w1t2: Salon-Bolschewist; +269|6774|Kakanien

yes, this was cruel

but in my opinion, all the money that goes to peta and other animal rights associations should be used to feed hungry children in africa, fight aids, clear minefields in afghanistan etc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L2oh3h3DvY0

2009-05-02 16:41:25

#8

LividBovine: The Year of the Cow!; +175|6681|MN

cl4u53w1t2 wrote:
yes, this was cruel

but in my opinion, all the money that goes to peta and other animal rights associations should be used to feed hungry children in africa, fight aids, clear minefields in afghanistan etc.

Yeah, it's funny how people get so worked up over animals when there are children dieing or going without families. Makes a lot of sense.

"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)

2009-05-02 16:43:12

#9

13rin: Member; +977|6781

How about China's abortion epidemic?

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2009-05-02 16:50:36

#10

LividBovine: The Year of the Cow!; +175|6681|MN

DBBrinson1 wrote:
How about China's abortion epidemic?

Right, what about it? Why is it not a bigger issue than the animals rights? Makes no sense to me.

"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)

2009-05-02 16:52:55

#11

Ioan92: Member; +337|6024

Shit that was disturbing. Poor dawg. Who actually signed it?

2009-05-02 17:03:50

#12

13rin: Member; +977|6781

Ioan92 wrote:
Shit that was disturbing. Poor dawg. Who actually signed it?

Hamas

I stood in line for four hours. They better give me a Wal-Mart gift card, or something. - Rodney Booker, Job Fair attendee.

2009-05-02 17:12:32

#13

Aries_37: arrivederci frog; +368|6877|London

The peta video is far worse. Includes the extended clip of the racoon skinning among other horrible scenes.

http://www.peta.org/feat/chineseFurFarms/index.asp

I think it's horrible but I'd rather donate to save human lives tbh

2009-05-03 00:04:11

#14

destruktion_6143: Was ist Loos?; +154|6928|Canada

We won Darwin's evolutionary game. so we ought to be able to do what we want. including eating animals. I personally would never do anything cruel to an animal, but i see no point in letting PETA survive.

(unless we are talking about People for Eating Tasty Animals)

2009-05-03 00:08:42

#15

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6454|what

How about Chinas human rights violations?

Because these animals are cute we should care more about them than we do Tibetans.

2009-05-03 00:27:48

#16

Superior Mind: (not macbeth); +1,755|6994

AussieReaper wrote:
How about Chinas human rights violations?

Because these animals are cute we should care more about them than we do Tibetans.

Are Tibetans skinned alive?

x

2009-05-03 00:32:46

#17

xBlackPantherx: Grow up, or die; +142|6644|California

Jesus fucking christ I had to stop watching it..

2009-05-03 00:35:07

#18

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6454|what

Superior Mind wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
How about Chinas human rights violations?

Because these animals are cute we should care more about them than we do Tibetans.
Are Tibetans skinned alive?

Too bad they aren't cute and fluffy. You might care about it then.

2009-05-03 00:53:38

#19

Superior Mind: (not macbeth); +1,755|6994

AussieReaper wrote:
Superior Mind wrote:
AussieReaper wrote:
How about Chinas human rights violations?

Because these animals are cute we should care more about them than we do Tibetans.
Are Tibetans skinned alive?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzCl95A90P0

Too bad they aren't cute and fluffy. You might care about it then.

I never said I don't care about the plight of the Tibetans; however, I shall ask once more: are they being skinned alive? The answer is no. While they are being horribly abused, having their culture and lives being destroyed, they are not being skinned alive.

x

2009-05-03 00:58:08

#20

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6454|what

Superior Mind wrote:
I never said I don't care about the plight of the Tibetans; however, I shall ask once more: are they being skinned alive? The answer is no. While they are being horribly abused, having their culture and lives being destroyed, they are not being skinned alive.

What difference does that make?

"Sure it's genocide, but that aren't being skinned alive...."

So they should be thankful for this fact?

2009-05-03 01:02:39

#21

Superior Mind: (not macbeth); +1,755|6994

AussieReaper wrote:
Superior Mind wrote:
I never said I don't care about the plight of the Tibetans; however, I shall ask once more: are they being skinned alive? The answer is no. While they are being horribly abused, having their culture and lives being destroyed, they are not being skinned alive.
What difference does that make?

"Sure it's genocide, but that aren't being skinned alive...."

So they should be thankful for this fact?

No. I'm just stating that being skinned alive is far worse than being shot dead. They shouldn't be thankful, but it should be clear that being skinned is worse of the two evils in the context of two animal victims. When one factors in the sympathy for our own species and our "awareness" of such blights against our own people then the two evils seems to exist on the same level.

x

2009-05-03 02:01:43

#22

LividBovine: The Year of the Cow!; +175|6681|MN

If I had $20K to spend:

Spend it on saving lots of baby seals or whatever your favorite cudly cute flea bag is?

Spend it on saving a human child from starving or receiving medical attention that would save their life?

Yeah, tough choice.

"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)

2009-05-03 02:05:53

#23

DrunkFace: Germans did 911; +427|6983|Disaster Free Zone

LividBovine wrote:
Spend it on saving lots of baby seals or whatever your favorite cudly cute flea bag is?

Without a shadow of a doubt.

2009-05-03 02:09:17

#24

LividBovine: The Year of the Cow!; +175|6681|MN

DrunkFace wrote:
LividBovine wrote:
Spend it on saving lots of baby seals or whatever your favorite cudly cute flea bag is?
Without a shadow of a doubt.

I hope your kidding.

"The President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation" - Barack Obama (a freshman senator from Illinios)

2009-05-03 02:14:47

#25

DrunkFace: Germans did 911; +427|6983|Disaster Free Zone

LividBovine wrote:
DrunkFace wrote:
LividBovine wrote:
Spend it on saving lots of baby seals or whatever your favorite cudly cute flea bag is?
Without a shadow of a doubt.
I hope your kidding.

No, not one little bit.
A simplified flow chart of how I feel.
Me>Family>Friends>Animals>Environment>fellow countrymen>everyone else>criminals

BF2S Forums China and non existent animal rights

bogo24dk wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

bogo24dk wrote:

cl4u53w1t2 wrote:

DBBrinson1 wrote:

Ioan92 wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

AussieReaper wrote:

Superior Mind wrote:

LividBovine wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

LividBovine wrote:

LividBovine wrote:

DrunkFace wrote:

LividBovine wrote:

Board footer