BF2S Forums Racism Or Censorship?

m3thod wrote:

lowing wrote:

"If there is any "apartheid policies", it is against Israel by the Arab and Islamic nations, and it would be so,"

THis is what i WROTE, key phrases being "apartheid policies", and "AND IT WOULD BE SO". It is no secret that these nations want Israel destroyed, and after that what would happen to the Jews at that point? DO you think they would be considered equals in the eyes of the new Arab or Islamic nation that filled the void that was once Israel? Iran already holds Jews as second class citizens. Your belief that, AFTER ISRAEL, the Jews would live in equality, and/or peace is not supported by history..

You should really looking into something called knowledge.  It's quite useful.

The Constitution of Iran says that Jews are equal to Muslims. Imam Khomeini visited with members of the Jewish community and issued a decree ordering the adherents of Judaism and other revealed religions to be protected. Jews are entitled to self-administration and elect their own representative to the 290-seat Majlis. Jewish burial rites and divorce laws are accepted by Islamic courts. Tehran has over 20 synagogues. Iran has one of only four Jewish charity hospitals in the world. The hospital has received donations from top Iranian officials, including President Ahmadinejad. Kosher butcher shops are available in Iran. There are Hebrew schools and coeducation is allowed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persian_Je … us_in_Iran

Last edited by benefit (2009-04-20 09:30:40)

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

"If there is any "apartheid policies", it is against Israel by the Arab and Islamic nations, and it would be so,"

THis is what i WROTE, key phrases being "apartheid policies", and "AND IT WOULD BE SO". It is no secret that these nations want Israel destroyed, and after that what would happen to the Jews at that point? DO you think they would be considered equals in the eyes of the new Arab or Islamic nation that filled the void that was once Israel? Iran already holds Jews as second class citizens. Your belief that, AFTER ISRAEL, the Jews would live in equality, and/or peace is not supporte by history..

Yes, that is what you wrote. In amongst all that horrific child like grammar you talk about apartheid, demonstrating almost complete ignorance of what the word means.

There are Jews living in Iran. There is no apartheid in Iran. Jews there are protected under the Iranian constitution. Even if you were linguistically correct, you don't have your facts straight. The US has made allegations of discrimination under the system in Iran, but these are claims that have been strenuously denied by the Jews actually living in Iran.

lowing wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

"If there is any "apartheid policies", it is against Israel by the Arab and Islamic nations, and it would be so,"

THis is what i WROTE, key phrases being "apartheid policies", and "AND IT WOULD BE SO". It is no secret that these nations want Israel destroyed, and after that what would happen to the Jews at that point? DO you think they would be considered equals in the eyes of the new Arab or Islamic nation that filled the void that was once Israel? Iran already holds Jews as second class citizens. Your belief that, AFTER ISRAEL, the Jews would live in equality, and/or peace is not supporte by history..

Yes, that is what you wrote. In amongst all that horrific child like grammar you talk about apartheid, demonstrating almost complete ignorance of what the word means.

There are Jews living in Iran. There is no apartheid in Iran. Jews there are protected under the Iranian constitution. Even if you were linguistically correct, you don't have your facts straight. The US has made allegations of discrimination under the system in Iran, but these are claims that have been strenuously denied by the Jews actually living in Iran.

I know exactly what the word means, and I wrote nothing that is inaccurate to that point. IF the Arab and Islamic nations had their way, Israel would be destroyed, the "apartheid polices" ( not my phrase) would dominate the attitude toward Jews in the after math.

Y0u are on crack if you think the Jews in Iran live in an equal and tolerant society..

Flecco wrote:

Protip for benefit:

Jews =/= Israel, k?

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Yes, that is what you wrote. In amongst all that horrific child like grammar you talk about apartheid, demonstrating almost complete ignorance of what the word means.

There are Jews living in Iran. There is no apartheid in Iran. Jews there are protected under the Iranian constitution. Even if you were linguistically correct, you don't have your facts straight. The US has made allegations of discrimination under the system in Iran, but these are claims that have been strenuously denied by the Jews actually living in Iran.

I know exactly what the word means, and I wrote nothing that is inaccurate to that point. IF the Arab and Islamic nations had their way, Israel would be destroyed, the "apartheid polices" ( not my phrase) would dominate the attitude toward Jews in the after math.

Y0u are on crack if you think the Jews in Iran live in an equal and tolerant society..

Under Iranian LAW Jews have exactly the same rights as Muslims in Iran. If you can't see that that isn't apartheid then you don't know what it means.

lowing wrote:

You know what, I treat my dog well, I feed him well, I allow him to sleep on my bed even. Still I recognize that HE is MY dog, and I am his master.

Iran does not view the Jews as equals, just because they are allowed to do certain things and might be treated well in other areas, thewy are not considered equals.

lowing wrote:

Flecco wrote:

So lowing, apartheid policies are cool yeah? Or is Israel a special case?

If there is any "apartheid policies", it is against Israel by the Arab and Islamic nations, and it would be so, if it were not for Israel's ability to defend itself and fend off any such action.

Bertster7 wrote:

lowing wrote:

Bertster7 wrote:

Under Iranian LAW Jews have exactly the same rights as Muslims in Iran. If you can't see that that isn't apartheid then you don't know what it means.

You know what, I treat my dog well, I feed him well, I allow him to sleep on my bed even. Still I recognize that HE is MY dog, and I am his master.

Iran does not view the Jews as equals, just because they are allowed to do certain things and might be treated well in other areas, thewy are not considered equals.

And what relevance does that have to apartheid? That's the word you used and that word applies only to legal segregation.

Maybe the Iranians do not view the Jews as equal - but the Iranian Jews themselves say they do and who are you or I to argue with them?

Man With No Name wrote:

so lowing still doesnt know what apartheid means.  instead arguing the case for his misuse of the the term in the context in which he intended, he talks about his dog sleeping on the bed. 

stay on topic.  make your argument.  dont change the story.

you always do this lowing.  as soon as you find that youve back yourself in a corner, you change the subject by going off on a tangent or talking about how youre being insulted.  its a very common theme in your posts.

Man With No Name wrote:

so lowing still doesnt know what apartheid means.  instead arguing the case for his misuse of the the term in the context in which he intended, he talks about his dog sleeping on the bed. 

stay on topic.  make your argument.  dont change the story.

you always do this lowing.  as soon as you find that youve back yourself in a corner, you change the subject by going off on a tangent or talking about how youre being insulted.  its a very common theme in your posts.