Pages: 1 2
Last edited by .Sup (2009-04-18 03:06:46)
Last edited by rammunition (2009-04-18 03:12:44)
not stupid....hhhmmmmmm so killing unarmed women and making sick t-shirts is part of the job thenTC.Troy wrote:
The headline should probably read more like this:
"Israel updates assault plans to strike Iranian nuclear targets."
This is Fox sensationalizing the situation. (all media do it, so dont go there, k? )
Hell, if the IDF dont have a contingency plan for about 100 or so major targets within its reach, they are stupid. The Israeli miliatary may be a lot of things...stupid is not one of them.
A non issue, or non-headline imo.
same thing for us EuropeansBeduin wrote:
Arabs? Last I heard was iranians are persians
ummmmm.....not really dude..Sup wrote:
same thing for us EuropeansBeduin wrote:
Arabs? Last I heard was iranians are persians
It'll probably be something out of the blue anyways. They wouldn't let their true attack plans seep out like this.TC.Troy wrote:
The headline should probably read more like this:
"Israel updates assault plans to strike Iranian nuclear targets."
This is Fox sensationalizing the situation. (all media do it, so dont go there, k? )
Hell, if the IDF dont have a contingency plan for about 100 or so major targets within its reach, they are stupid. The Israeli miliatary may be a lot of things...stupid is not one of them.
A non issue, or non-headline imo.
oh, c'mon, isn't this easy - preventing a state from accuiring nukes is one thing, but taking nukes from a state that already has 'em is another, don't you think so? who knows, they might be crazy enough to use one! even that bloody "land of 'em free and the brave" don't risk messing with those who have nukes (yet), no matter how eager they are to "spread democracy" and "liberate the oppressed".Flecco wrote:
Either way Pos if it starts a major war I'll be pissed. How is Iran getting nukes any worse than letting Pakistan keep what it already has?
Last edited by Mekstizzle (2009-04-18 06:19:10)
I would be inclined to agree. I wouldn't imagine an attack of this nature on a country like Iran would be anything resembling a walk in the park, plus don't Iran have Israeli nuclear sites within range of their own Shahab-3 missiles systems?Mekstizzle wrote:
This is all just bullshit IMO.
I was reading some .pdf about how Israel would actually attack Iran if they went about and did it, and suffice to say, whilst the report talked about Israel's technical superiority (to a certain degree), when it came down to actually fucking getting to Iran from Israel (without external help from surrounding countries) the article tried to look at various routes and options but all of them had major setbacks. All you have to do is look at a map yourself and realise that it's pretty much impossible for Israel to attack Iran without the help of someone else. And it's unlikely that any country in the area would help Israel (not even the US)
Not to mention the fact that you would probably need a full scale air bombardment using the USAF to completely take down Irans nuclear infrastructure...
The story is originally from The Times as stated by fox:Diesel_dyk wrote:
If this happens it looks like we will get Armageddon.... its the end times.... no, no its another Fox story written for the segment of its viewers who are end time believers.
Good thing we've got Israel to provoke them into fighting a common enemy.S.Lythberg wrote:
As for the end of days, the shiite Iranians usually have little support from the sunni majority, remember that most of the muslim world hates each other when they're not busy hating us.
^^^I saw that coming a mile off.AussieReaper wrote:
Good thing we've got Israel to provoke them into fighting a common enemy.S.Lythberg wrote:
As for the end of days, the shiite Iranians usually have little support from the sunni majority, remember that most of the muslim world hates each other when they're not busy hating us.
but they wouldn't do it well, that's partly why they failed to destroy Israel the first time, they had vastly superior numbers, but were much too uncoordinated to get much accomplishedAussieReaper wrote:
Good thing we've got Israel to provoke them into fighting a common enemy.S.Lythberg wrote:
As for the end of days, the shiite Iranians usually have little support from the sunni majority, remember that most of the muslim world hates each other when they're not busy hating us.
You basically think they're gone make the same mistake twice ?!S.Lythberg wrote:
but they wouldn't do it well, that's partly why they failed to destroy Israel the first time, they had vastly superior numbers, but were much too uncoordinated to get much accomplishedAussieReaper wrote:
Good thing we've got Israel to provoke them into fighting a common enemy.S.Lythberg wrote:
As for the end of days, the shiite Iranians usually have little support from the sunni majority, remember that most of the muslim world hates each other when they're not busy hating us.
Last edited by mafia996630 (2009-04-18 08:45:36)
they've been in the same situation for 500 years, so yes I domafia996630 wrote:
You basically think they're gone make the same mistake twice ?S.Lythberg wrote:
but they wouldn't do it well, that's partly why they failed to destroy Israel the first time, they had vastly superior numbers, but were much too uncoordinated to get much accomplishedAussieReaper wrote:
Good thing we've got Israel to provoke them into fighting a common enemy.
Even more reason why they're not gone make the same mistake again.S.Lythberg wrote:
they've been in the same situation for 500 years, so yes I domafia996630 wrote:
You basically think they're gone make the same mistake twice ?S.Lythberg wrote:
but they wouldn't do it well, that's partly why they failed to destroy Israel the first time, they had vastly superior numbers, but were much too uncoordinated to get much accomplished
If they learned from their mistakes, they wouldn't be firmly lodged in the third world electing ineffective leaders and doing their best to halt progress.mafia996630 wrote:
Even more reason why they're not gone make the same mistake again.S.Lythberg wrote:
they've been in the same situation for 500 years, so yes I domafia996630 wrote:
You basically think they're gone make the same mistake twice ?
Pages: 1 2