I am familiar with the part about killing Homosexuals (I think), but I do not recall where the "people with poor eyesight should be killed" section is.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
The bible says Homosexuals and people with poor eyesight should be killed. Do all Christians go around killings gays?.
Extremist sects (in all religions) will take some BS interpretation of religion and exploit it for their own purposes. it been happening for hundreds of years.
sorry don't know exactly where it is... it was on a TV show but i can't be bothered re-watching the episode to find it lolnickb64 wrote:
I am familiar with the part about killing Homosexuals (I think), but I do not recall where the "people with poor eyesight should be killed" section is.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
The bible says Homosexuals and people with poor eyesight should be killed. Do all Christians go around killings gays?.
Extremist sects (in all religions) will take some BS interpretation of religion and exploit it for their own purposes. it been happening for hundreds of years.
Please enlighten me.
Yes on page 2.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
cba to read all 250 posts...
Has anyone pointed out that the article linked to in the OP does not mention any kind of 'molestation' at all - only a 'marriage'?
Lowing response.Dilbert_X wrote:
I read it, no molestation, just marriage.
Which it doesn't, but that doesn't matter does it?lowing wrote:
1. Ummmm yeah marriage implies sex.
Why? It's not obvious to me, please explain. What makes getting married at 18 ok, but not ok at 17? Who came up with this arbitrary age requirement for marriage and more importantly what makes it right?Lowing wrote:
2. Also, like I said, geting married at 15 is not the same thing as marrying an 6 or 8 year old, for obvious reasons.
K, thx.DrunkFace wrote:
Yes on page 2.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
cba to read all 250 posts...
Has anyone pointed out that the article linked to in the OP does not mention any kind of 'molestation' at all - only a 'marriage'?Dilbert_X wrote:
I read it, no molestation, just marriage.
In lowing-land it does.DrunkFace wrote:
Lowing response.Which it doesn't, but that doesn't matter does it?lowing wrote:
1. Ummmm yeah marriage implies sex.
lolwing-land tbhScorpion0x17 wrote:
In lowing-land it does.
6 or 8 is way different than 17 or 18.DrunkFace wrote:
Yes on page 2.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
cba to read all 250 posts...
Has anyone pointed out that the article linked to in the OP does not mention any kind of 'molestation' at all - only a 'marriage'?Lowing response.Dilbert_X wrote:
I read it, no molestation, just marriage.Which it doesn't, but that doesn't matter does it?lowing wrote:
1. Ummmm yeah marriage implies sex.
AlsoWhy? It's not obvious to me, please explain. What makes getting married at 18 ok, but not ok at 17? Who came up with this arbitrary age requirement for marriage and more importantly what makes it right?Lowing wrote:
2. Also, like I said, geting married at 15 is not the same thing as marrying an 6 or 8 year old, for obvious reasons.
Well to be honest, I wasn't even going to respond that idiocy, or those that supported it.ATG wrote:
6 or 8 is way different than 17 or 18.DrunkFace wrote:
Yes on page 2.Scorpion0x17 wrote:
cba to read all 250 posts...
Has anyone pointed out that the article linked to in the OP does not mention any kind of 'molestation' at all - only a 'marriage'?Lowing response.Dilbert_X wrote:
I read it, no molestation, just marriage.Which it doesn't, but that doesn't matter does it?lowing wrote:
1. Ummmm yeah marriage implies sex.
AlsoWhy? It's not obvious to me, please explain. What makes getting married at 18 ok, but not ok at 17? Who came up with this arbitrary age requirement for marriage and more importantly what makes it right?Lowing wrote:
2. Also, like I said, geting married at 15 is not the same thing as marrying an 6 or 8 year old, for obvious reasons.
Don't be thick.
You mean you don't know the Bible inside out, from cover to cover? You're letting the side down, lowing knows everything about the bible AND the Qua'ran and he's not even religious.nickb64 wrote:
I am familiar with the part about killing Homosexuals (I think), but I do not recall where the "people with poor eyesight should be killed" section is.Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
The bible says Homosexuals and people with poor eyesight should be killed. Do all Christians go around killings gays?.
Extremist sects (in all religions) will take some BS interpretation of religion and exploit it for their own purposes. it been happening for hundreds of years.
Please enlighten me.
Abraham killing a son is okay. The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah is okay. The killing of first born Egyptians is okay. But hold on, there's a few blind who may be killed too!? Now I am outraged.nickb64 wrote:
I am familiar with the part about killing Homosexuals (I think), but I do not recall where the "people with poor eyesight should be killed" section is.
Please enlighten me.
My point isn't about the age it's about who came up with this arbitrary figure. There's a big difference between 18 and 40, so why is 18 acceptable to you? What makes you believe this arbitrary figure is right and who told you it was right or did you just 'know'? Do you think you might have a different perspective on things if you had been born in a different country?ATG wrote:
6 or 8 is way different than 17 or 18.DrunkFace wrote:
Why? It's not obvious to me, please explain. What makes getting married at 18 ok, but not ok at 17? Who came up with this arbitrary age requirement for marriage and more importantly what makes it right?Lowing wrote:
2. Also, like I said, geting married at 15 is not the same thing as marrying an 6 or 8 year old, for obvious reasons.
Don't be thick.
What you say is true. THe problem comes into play with the ever increasing intrusion of this culture into western society, not to assimulate to the west but with the attitude and intention of accomodation and eventual replacement.destruktion_6143 wrote:
TBH how did this last 11 pages? We are debating about another cultures laws. We have no right to judge them, just bc it doesnt abide by our laws or morals, doesnt mean we are better. Islam is fucked up, i agree, but it still doesnt give us the right to judge them.
Are muslims marrying YOUR kids? Stoning YOUR women? no. so chill out and worry about problems that actually affect you.
i agree yet a muslim living in the UK cant legally do this. he will still get jailedlowing wrote:
What you say is true. THe problem comes into play with the ever increasing intrusion of this culture into western society, not to assimulate to the west but with the attitude and intention of accomodation and eventual replacement.destruktion_6143 wrote:
TBH how did this last 11 pages? We are debating about another cultures laws. We have no right to judge them, just bc it doesnt abide by our laws or morals, doesnt mean we are better. Islam is fucked up, i agree, but it still doesnt give us the right to judge them.
Are muslims marrying YOUR kids? Stoning YOUR women? no. so chill out and worry about problems that actually affect you.
Shara Law is apparently already a part of the British legal system. Give it time.destruktion_6143 wrote:
i agree yet a muslim living in the UK cant legally do this. he will still get jailedlowing wrote:
What you say is true. THe problem comes into play with the ever increasing intrusion of this culture into western society, not to assimulate to the west but with the attitude and intention of accomodation and eventual replacement.destruktion_6143 wrote:
TBH how did this last 11 pages? We are debating about another cultures laws. We have no right to judge them, just bc it doesnt abide by our laws or morals, doesnt mean we are better. Islam is fucked up, i agree, but it still doesnt give us the right to judge them.
Are muslims marrying YOUR kids? Stoning YOUR women? no. so chill out and worry about problems that actually affect you.
Sharia law courts in the UK have already been covered, and the sensationalist approach dismissed. I'll search around for the threadlowing wrote:
Shara Law is apparently already a part of the British legal system. Give it time.destruktion_6143 wrote:
i agree yet a muslim living in the UK cant legally do this. he will still get jailedlowing wrote:
What you say is true. THe problem comes into play with the ever increasing intrusion of this culture into western society, not to assimulate to the west but with the attitude and intention of accomodation and eventual replacement.
I agree, it has been covered, and it has been dismissed, we call it appeasement, or your head in the sand. Take your pickFatherTed wrote:
Sharia law courts in the UK have already been covered, and the sensationalist approach dismissed. I'll search around for the threadlowing wrote:
Shara Law is apparently already a part of the British legal system. Give it time.destruktion_6143 wrote:
i agree yet a muslim living in the UK cant legally do this. he will still get jailed
It's not appeasment if the facility already exists for other faiths to do the same thing, if anything it would be discrimination.lowing wrote:
I agree, it has been covered, and it has been dismissed, we call it appeasement, or your head in the sand. Take your pickFatherTed wrote:
Sharia law courts in the UK have already been covered, and the sensationalist approach dismissed. I'll search around for the threadlowing wrote:
Shara Law is apparently already a part of the British legal system. Give it time.
Perhaps, it is just that, some appeasement, is a little more dangerous and harmful, than other forms of appeasementFatherTed wrote:
It's not appeasment if the facility already exists for other faiths to do the same thing, if anything it would be discrimination.lowing wrote:
I agree, it has been covered, and it has been dismissed, we call it appeasement, or your head in the sand. Take your pickFatherTed wrote:
Sharia law courts in the UK have already been covered, and the sensationalist approach dismissed. I'll search around for the thread
I will concede the UK does appear to love appeasement atm, though this is hardly contained to Islamic issues, and definatly not contained to the UK.
That's my point though. Islam in itself isn't fucked up. It will moderate as the countries modernise, become more moderate and in general move away from the eye for an eye tit for tat you impugned upon my honour bullshit.destruktion_6143 wrote:
TBH how did this last 11 pages? We are debating about another cultures laws. We have no right to judge them, just bc it doesnt abide by our laws or morals, doesnt mean we are better. Islam is fucked up, i agree, but it still doesnt give us the right to judge them.
Are muslims marrying YOUR kids? Stoning YOUR women? no. so chill out and worry about problems that actually affect you.
You may be right, however, Islam without a doubt, is the ball carrier for such behavior in the here and now. It must be, since when ever some wants to turn the tables and point at Christianity as a problem too, they gotta go back to the fuckin' crusades to make a point. Islam, shit, all ya need is todays paper.Flecco wrote:
That's my point though. Islam in itself isn't fucked up. It will moderate as the countries modernise, become more moderate and in general move away from the eye for an eye tit for tat you impugned upon my honour bullshit.destruktion_6143 wrote:
TBH how did this last 11 pages? We are debating about another cultures laws. We have no right to judge them, just bc it doesnt abide by our laws or morals, doesnt mean we are better. Islam is fucked up, i agree, but it still doesnt give us the right to judge them.
Are muslims marrying YOUR kids? Stoning YOUR women? no. so chill out and worry about problems that actually affect you.
The problem is a cultural one that Islam has been tacked onto, this kind of shit didn't start with Islam and it isn't restricted to it.
Already recommended you a book which has some theories on why things are like this. Has a lot more to do with socioeconomic factors and cultural development outside the sphere of religion. Outside, but not unrelated.lowing wrote:
You may be right, however, Islam without a doubt, is the ball carrier for such behavior in the here and now. It must be, since when ever some wants to turn the tables and point at Christianity as a problem too, they gotta go back to the fuckin' crusades to make a point. Islam, shit, all ya need is todays paper.Flecco wrote:
That's my point though. Islam in itself isn't fucked up. It will moderate as the countries modernise, become more moderate and in general move away from the eye for an eye tit for tat you impugned upon my honour bullshit.destruktion_6143 wrote:
TBH how did this last 11 pages? We are debating about another cultures laws. We have no right to judge them, just bc it doesnt abide by our laws or morals, doesnt mean we are better. Islam is fucked up, i agree, but it still doesnt give us the right to judge them.
Are muslims marrying YOUR kids? Stoning YOUR women? no. so chill out and worry about problems that actually affect you.
The problem is a cultural one that Islam has been tacked onto, this kind of shit didn't start with Islam and it isn't restricted to it.