Study Shows Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Americans More Likely to Be Poor

2009-03-27 15:54:19

#1

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

Yahoo wrote:
he Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law today released a first-of-its-kind report that shows lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans are as likely, and in some cases more likely, to be poor than their heterosexual counterparts.

Because the U.S. Census Bureau does not explicitly ask questions about sexual orientation, LGB adults and families have been invisible in poverty statistics. This first analysis of the poor and low-income lesbian, gay and bisexual population synthesizes data from three major sources: the 2000 Census, the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Surveys.

"The report highlights a significant segment of the poor and low-income population that has largely been ignored," said M.V. Lee Badgett, research director at The Williams Institute and an author of the study. "The data clearly undermine the persistent myth that the gay community is monolithically affluent. As a group, quite the contrary is true."

Though poverty is on the rise among all Americans, the authors of the study -- entitled Poverty in the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Community -- suggest that unique social and political aspects of LGB life play a role in contributing to higher rates of poverty in this community, including vulnerability to employment discrimination, inability to marry and higher numbers of uninsured.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20090320/p … erosexuals
Save the American economy let gays get married.

Last edited by Macbeth (2009-03-27 15:54:43)

2009-03-27 16:01:30

#2

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6957

Oh god, please don't give them more things to hoot and holler about...

2009-03-27 16:02:40

#3

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6593|Éire

Have they not heard of Hollywood or something?

2009-03-27 16:23:45

#4

The#1Spot: Member; +105|6842|byah

Macbeth wrote:
Yahoo wrote:
he Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law today released a first-of-its-kind report that shows lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans are as likely, and in some cases more likely, to be poor than their heterosexual counterparts.

Because the U.S. Census Bureau does not explicitly ask questions about sexual orientation, LGB adults and families have been invisible in poverty statistics. This first analysis of the poor and low-income lesbian, gay and bisexual population synthesizes data from three major sources: the 2000 Census, the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Surveys.

"The report highlights a significant segment of the poor and low-income population that has largely been ignored," said M.V. Lee Badgett, research director at The Williams Institute and an author of the study. "The data clearly undermine the persistent myth that the gay community is monolithically affluent. As a group, quite the contrary is true."

Though poverty is on the rise among all Americans, the authors of the study -- entitled Poverty in the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Community -- suggest that unique social and political aspects of LGB life play a role in contributing to higher rates of poverty in this community, including vulnerability to employment discrimination, inability to marry and higher numbers of uninsured.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20090320/p … erosexuals
Save the American economy let gays get married.

Fuck the mentally screwed up.

2009-03-27 16:25:15

#5

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

The#1Spot wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
Yahoo wrote:
he Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law today released a first-of-its-kind report that shows lesbian, gay and bisexual Americans are as likely, and in some cases more likely, to be poor than their heterosexual counterparts.

Because the U.S. Census Bureau does not explicitly ask questions about sexual orientation, LGB adults and families have been invisible in poverty statistics. This first analysis of the poor and low-income lesbian, gay and bisexual population synthesizes data from three major sources: the 2000 Census, the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Surveys.

"The report highlights a significant segment of the poor and low-income population that has largely been ignored," said M.V. Lee Badgett, research director at The Williams Institute and an author of the study. "The data clearly undermine the persistent myth that the gay community is monolithically affluent. As a group, quite the contrary is true."

Though poverty is on the rise among all Americans, the authors of the study -- entitled Poverty in the Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Community -- suggest that unique social and political aspects of LGB life play a role in contributing to higher rates of poverty in this community, including vulnerability to employment discrimination, inability to marry and higher numbers of uninsured.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usnw/20090320/p … erosexuals
Save the American economy let gays get married.
Fuck the mentally screwed up.

Hope that's sarcasm.

2009-03-27 16:26:16

#6

Man With No Name: جندي; +148|5877|The Wild West

Braddock wrote:
Have they not heard of Hollywood or something?

Hollywood is full of homeless

2009-03-27 16:26:59

#7

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|6974|UK

yeah they're called actors.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2009-03-27 16:29:10

#8

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7064

little help here...

"Because the U.S. Census Bureau does not explicitly ask questions about sexual orientation, LGB adults and families have been invisible in poverty statistics."

and

"This first analysis of the poor and low-income lesbian, gay and bisexual population synthesizes data from three major sources: the 2000 Census, the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Surveys."

?

2009-03-27 16:30:24

#9

mtb0minime: minimember; +2,418|6957

I once had some guy stay at my place (roommate brought him, not me) who turned out to be a gay porn star / slut. He makes bank and finally rents his own place and has a sweet plasma tv. However, a lot of that money is spent on medical bills... wonder why...

2009-03-27 16:31:20

#10

Braddock: Agitator; +916|6593|Éire

Joking aside... might it have something to do with young homosexuals being thrown out of home by disapproving parents or hounded out of town by small-minded conservatives? It's kind of hard to stay on the right side of the tracks when you are a youngster living on the streets turning tricks to get money for food. Look at the homeless problem in San Francisco, how many young gay and lesbian Americans have escaped to San Francisco in search of some sort of tolerant Utopia only to find harsh reality?

...I know this is only one type of scenario but it is, anecdotally at least, a common story for many American small-town homosexuals and the same thing doesn't really apply to heterosexual demographics and so it could skew statistics. Just a theory.

Last edited by Braddock (2009-03-27 16:34:17)

2009-03-27 16:31:31

#11

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

usmarine wrote:
little help here...

"Because the U.S. Census Bureau does not explicitly ask questions about sexual orientation, LGB adults and families have been invisible in poverty statistics."

and

"This first analysis of the poor and low-income lesbian, gay and bisexual population synthesizes data from three major sources: the 2000 Census, the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2003 and 2005 California Health Interview Surveys."

?

2000 Census had 2 questions in it that could determine if you are in a sex same relationship.

2009-03-27 16:32:12

#12

Man With No Name: جندي; +148|5877|The Wild West

thing is, its nearly impossible to get any real statistics on homeless people.

2009-03-27 16:32:39

#13

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7064

Macbeth wrote:
2000 Census had 2 questions in it that could determine if you are in a sex same relationship.

yes but isnt the census mostly a guess in a lot of cases?

2009-03-27 16:33:37

#14

m3thod: All kiiiiiiiiinds of gainz; +2,197|6974|UK

statistical sampling. look it up.

google is you friend.

Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.

2009-03-27 16:34:24

#15

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

usmarine wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
2000 Census had 2 questions in it that could determine if you are in a sex same relationship.
yes but isnt the census mostly a guess in a lot of cases?

Census Forms, Marine

2009-03-27 16:57:49

#16

Flecco: iPod is broken.; +1,048|6967|NT, like Mick Dundee

Man With No Name wrote:
thing is, its nearly impossible to get any real statistics on homeless people.

Nah it's not. You can test all sorts of pharmaceutical and medical products on them with the offer of a shower, a warm bed and some food.

Also great bio-weapons test subjects.

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.

2009-03-28 00:59:04

#17

unnamednewbie13: Moderator; +2,060|7074|PNW

Macbeth wrote:
Study Shows Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Americans More Likely to Be Poor
...and unlikely to pay the city of Seattle what they owe for queervents.

Title fixed.

Last edited by unnamednewbie13 (2009-03-28 00:59:47)

2009-03-28 01:04:26

#18

Kmar: Truth is my Bitch; +5,695|6903|132 and Bush

Braddock wrote:
Have they not heard of Hollywood or something?

or south beach.. or san fran?

Xbone Stormsurgezz

2009-03-28 06:53:53

#19

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7064

Macbeth wrote:
usmarine wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
2000 Census had 2 questions in it that could determine if you are in a sex same relationship.
yes but isnt the census mostly a guess in a lot of cases?
Census Forms, Marine

what does the form have to do with anything when tons of people never fill them out anyway?

2009-03-28 08:09:54

#20

Macbeth: Banned; +2,444|5888

usmarine wrote:
Macbeth wrote:
usmarine wrote:

yes but isnt the census mostly a guess in a lot of cases?
Census Forms, Marine
what does the form have to do with anything when tons of people never fill them out anyway?

Well the 2000 forums had a few questions that could determine if you were in a sex same relationship. Also the study crunched the numbers from 3 different reports and sources and came to this conclusion. So we're not going by census data alone here.

2009-03-28 10:16:06

#21

Harmor: Error_Name_Not_Found; +605|6851|San Diego, CA, USA

I don't understand why Bisexuals make less...I mean they could sleep with their boss no matter what their sex to make more money, right?

2009-03-29 00:56:26

#22

BVC: Member; +325|6998

BIggotry won't be doing them any favours.

2009-03-29 04:12:45

#23

Dilbert_X: The X stands for; +1,817|6408|eXtreme to the maX

They tend to be more narcissistic, which doesn't help them through life.

Fuck Israel

BF2S Forums Study Shows Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Americans More Likely to Be Poor

Yahoo wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Yahoo wrote:

The#1Spot wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Yahoo wrote:

Braddock wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Man With No Name wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

Braddock wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Macbeth wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Board footer