Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7113|Nårvei

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:


no way?  wow...thanks varegg.  i dont know the difference,
Seeing as you thought both was okay I kinda doubt it
no.. the reasons i dont have any real issue with either is the same as what i quoted.
Because I'm not into crime is a poor excuse for thinking tapping private phones is okay ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7064

Varegg wrote:

Because I'm not into crime is a poor excuse for thinking tapping private phones is okay ...
says you.  and i dont care what you say.  so there.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7113|Nårvei

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Because I'm not into crime is a poor excuse for thinking tapping private phones is okay ...
says you.  and i dont care what you say.  so there.
What a thoughtful answer ...

Problem defending your views?
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7064

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

Because I'm not into crime is a poor excuse for thinking tapping private phones is okay ...
says you.  and i dont care what you say.  so there.
What a thoughtful answer ...

Problem defending your views?
i dont have to defend them.  why would i have to defend MY views?  its what i think.  thats it.  simple.

i guess if i cared what you thought i would feel the need to defend them, but i dont.
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7113|Nårvei

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:


says you.  and i dont care what you say.  so there.
What a thoughtful answer ...

Problem defending your views?
i dont have to defend them.  why would i have to defend MY views?  its what i think.  thats it.  simple.

i guess if i cared what you thought i would feel the need to defend them, but i dont.
Well ... then I guess we can regard most of your views and posts as mindless dribble then since you don't care enough or have the ability to elaborate ...

Nice turn Mr. T
Wait behind the line ..............................................................
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6832|Global Command

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:


says you.  and i dont care what you say.  so there.
What a thoughtful answer ...

Problem defending your views?
i dont have to defend them.  why would i have to defend MY views?  its what i think.  thats it.  simple.

i guess if i cared what you thought i would feel the need to defend them, but i dont.
I hear ice cracking.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina
Well, if some of you are ok with cameras everywhere and possibly even wiretaps, surely you must be ok with a national DNA, fingerprint, and retinal scan database of all citizens.  Afterall, if you've got nothing to hide, what's there to worry about?  I'm sure it would make solving crimes easier too.
imortal
Member
+240|6967|Austin, TX

usmarine wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

For an American, you're awfully supportive of authoritarianism.
interesting.  or..... i am sick of people not following the law and I am willing to give up MY privacy to make their lives of easy money and laziness harder.  sorry more people dont feel that way.
I don't like it for the power it can give someone who wants to start monitoring, legal, but activities they may not like.  Once the tools are in place, they (peop[le in power) can choose how to use them.
IG-Calibre
comhalta
+226|7045|Tír Eoghan, Tuaisceart Éireann
as long as the cameras are being pointed at "them" as well as at "us"

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard