usmarine
Banned
+2,785|7064

The Iranian government brushed aside a Persian New Year's message Friday from President Barack Obama

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090320/ap_ … iran_obama


see O, is not as easy as just giving a speech all the time.  you can see that now i hope.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina
Being reasonable is sometimes a very burdensome thing.  The benefit to things like this, however, is that hardliners are typically unable to come up with much of a counter.

For example, all the Taliban could say about his response concerning moderate Taliban members was that Obama was being illogical.  If you read between the lines, it's basically a desperate attempt by fanatics to distract people from a reasonable response.

As always, diplomacy is a slow process that only bears fruit after an extended amount of time.  Patience is of the utmost importance.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6525|Escea

Turquoise wrote:

Being reasonable is sometimes a very burdensome thing.  The benefit to things like this, however, is that hardliners are typically unable to come up with much of a counter.

For example, all the Taliban could say about his response concerning moderate Taliban members was that Obama was being illogical.  If you read between the lines, it's basically a desperate attempt by fanatics to distract people from a reasonable response.

As always, diplomacy is a slow process that only bears fruit after an extended amount of time.  Patience is of the utmost importance.
Yeah but, this is dealing with leaders who seem more likely to avoid any diplomatic method if it means they have to play down their hard man stature.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina
Yes, but when they do that, they begin to lose their support among the public.

The average Iranian is already much more moderate than the Ayatollah or Ahmadinejad.  By taking the opposite approach from aggression, this makes it harder for the Iranians to demonize us and slowly forces their government to act less fanatically.

Even though Iran has a faux democracy, it still has to somewhat behave like a real one.
Reciprocity
Member
+721|6883|the dank(super) side of Oregon
I'm sure Barry was expecting the revolution to begin shortly after his speech.
Dilbert_X
The X stands for
+1,817|6409|eXtreme to the maX
Takes time to change, and as they said - need deeds not words.
Iran isn;t going to forgive and forget after one speach.
Politicians grand-stand for domestic consumption all the time too, on both sides of the atlantic.
Fuck Israel
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7019
and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Love is the answer
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6525|Escea

Turquoise wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
Well that depends if they flog one to someone.
Lotta_Drool
Spit
+350|6486|Ireland

Turquoise wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
^^^^
What fucking planet do you live on?  Really, you answer your own question because I want to see if you can string together a coherent thought based in reality.  Jesus fucking christ.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6968|NT, like Mick Dundee

M.O.A.B wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
Well that depends if they flog one to someone.
Because, Pakistan, India, Israel, Russia, France etc. wont?
Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6525|Escea

Flecco wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Turquoise wrote:


Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
Well that depends if they flog one to someone.
Because, Pakistan, India, Israel, Russia, France etc. wont?
For having them for a few decades each, just over for Pakistan and India, they haven't yet. But they also don't seem to be the ones who have been linked time and time again to supplying high-end weaponry to groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and groups inside Iraq.
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

Lotta_Drool wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
^^^^
What fucking planet do you live on?  Really, you answer your own question because I want to see if you can string together a coherent thought based in reality.  Jesus fucking christ.
Speaking of being incoherent, would you care to explain your response?

I just mentioned that Israel and Pakistan have nukes.  If Iran gets them, it's not going to change much.  People keep assuming that Iran would give nuclear materials to terrorists.  If you're willing to make that assumption, you've got an equal amount of reason to assume that Pakistan would do the same, primarily because Pakistan has a less stable government and their equivalent of the CIA (the ISI) has many people sympathetic to groups like the Taliban.

So again, if Iran gets nukes, what changes?  As far as I can tell, Iran would simply be able to keep anyone from hastily invading them.
Flecco
iPod is broken.
+1,048|6968|NT, like Mick Dundee

M.O.A.B wrote:

Flecco wrote:

M.O.A.B wrote:

Well that depends if they flog one to someone.
Because, Pakistan, India, Israel, Russia, France etc. wont?
For having them for a few decades each, just over for Pakistan and India, they haven't yet. But they also don't seem to be the ones who have been linked time and time again to supplying high-end weaponry to groups like Hamas, Hezbollah and groups inside Iraq.
The risk is still there. New governments/extremist factions. What if Pakistan does collapse? The French had a big role in Israel's early nuclear development. Having nuclear power/weapons for decades doesn't guarantee anything as far as proliferation of nuclear weapons goes. For all Canada's talk they played a nice little role in India's development. I'm not sure Iran would flog them off either, I mean look at the way AQ backfired on Saudi Arabia after all the funding their Intelligence service sent to Afghanistan during the war with the Soviets. Would they be keen to make the same mistake? I'm not sure Ahmadinejacket wants an Israeli nuke put through his office window, for all his talk.


USA wouldn't have had a problem if the dictatorship they put in was still there tbh.

Last edited by Flecco (2009-03-21 13:38:29)

Whoa... Can't believe these forums are still kicking.
Harmor
Error_Name_Not_Found
+605|6851|San Diego, CA, USA
I wonder if the Iranians will make a fool of Obama like they did to Carter in the 1970s.
ATG
Banned
+5,233|6832|Global Command
O's message to the Iranians;



Notice the code speak at the end.

Here is the official Iranian response.

M.O.A.B
'Light 'em up!'
+1,220|6525|Escea

ATG wrote:

O's message to the Iranians;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY_utC-hrjI

Notice the code speak at the end.

Here is the official Iranian response.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1Vr8Kaw9xI
LMAO!
Spearhead
Gulf coast redneck hippy
+731|6993|Tampa Bay Florida
So what?  Does this really hurt anyone except the Iranians by making their gov't look like assholes?
Catbox
forgiveness
+505|7019
Heres another warm reception to BO's olive branch... I'm starting to think they dont like us... hope BO figures it out quickly...?

"Iran's response to US shows mind-set of leadership"
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates – The Iranian leader's rebuff on Saturday to President Barack Obama's offer for dialogue was swift and sweeping: Words from Washington ring hollow without deep policy changes.

But Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's response was more than just a dismissive slap at the outreach. It was a broad lesson in the mind-set of Iran's all-powerful theocracy and how it will dictate the pace and tone of any new steps by Obama to chip away at their nearly 30-year diplomatic freeze.

"It's the first stage of the bargaining in classic Iranian style: Be tough and play up your toughness," said Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a professor of regional politics at United Arab Emirates University. "The Iranian leaders are not about concessions at this stage. It's still all about ideology from the Iranian side."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090321/ap_ … hat_s_next
Love is the answer
nickb64
formerly from OC (it's EXACTLY like on tv)[truth]
+77|5914|Greatest Nation on Earth(USA)

Turquoise wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
The Iranians do not fear a nuclear retribution for any action once they get the A bomb. They have a suicidal ideology that basically leads them to not care as long as "the evil Zionist Regime" falls/is annihilated. On the news last night, there was a woman from a middle eastern country who basically said that the only view that would be gotten by Extreme Muslim groups from any meetings/negotiations would be that we were effectively "negotiating the terms of our surrender".

Last edited by nickb64 (2009-03-21 17:31:45)

Mekstizzle
WALKER
+3,611|6924|London, England
Persian new year? I'd imagine that this....Persian New Year is something that stems from pre-Islamic times, why would they be celebrating it? Surely it goes against their strict Islamic values, and a reminder of their heathen non-Islamic past (that is, before the Arabs came and kicked their arse and converted them to Islam)

I'm actually right too, after looking at Wiki. I'm actually surprised that they make a big deal about this Persian new year

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2009-03-21 17:35:06)

Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6708|North Carolina

nickb64 wrote:

Turquoise wrote:

[TUF]Catbox wrote:

and it takes time for Iran to build a nuke and they are greatful for the weak president...
Israel has nukes.  Pakistan has nukes.  If Iran gets them, does it really change things much?
The Iranians do not fear a nuclear retribution for any action once they get the A bomb. They have a suicidal ideology that basically leads them to not care as long as "the evil Zionist Regime" falls/is annihilated. On the news last night, there was a woman from a middle eastern country who basically said that the only view that would be gotten by Extreme Muslim groups from any meetings/negotiations would be that we were effectively "negotiating the terms of our surrender".
Why is it that, whenever something involves Iran, people believe in such insane ideas?

You really think that Iran is suicidal?  Look, the Ayatollah is definitely an extremist, but he's not stupid.  As a previous post pointed out, Iran likes to feign being tough.  Why?  Because its leaders thrive on paranoia -- much like some of our own.

Again, it takes time for diplomacy to work, and if you think that the previous stalemate of us vs. them is the way to continue, you're dead wrong.

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2025 Jeff Minard