They are just jealous. The HTC has touchscreen and qwerty keyboard. I have three HTC Fuzes for the family.Gooners wrote:
fuck you guys i like my touchscreen <3
Last edited by Ilocano (2009-02-25 15:33:01)
wow, a feature every decent phone since the late 90's hasIlocano wrote:
Thing is that, I don't even touch the phone to make calls. HTC Fuze has Voice Command. I just press the button on my bluetooth headset, tell it to call by name, answer "yes", then I'm connected.
Maybe he has lived in a barn/caravan/Wales and just discovered modern technology?max wrote:
wow, a feature every decent phone since the late 90's hasIlocano wrote:
Thing is that, I don't even touch the phone to make calls. HTC Fuze has Voice Command. I just press the button on my bluetooth headset, tell it to call by name, answer "yes", then I'm connected.
I was replying to Freezer7Pro's remark about having to dial a phone number.max wrote:
wow, a feature every decent phone since the late 90's hasIlocano wrote:
Thing is that, I don't even touch the phone to make calls. HTC Fuze has Voice Command. I just press the button on my bluetooth headset, tell it to call by name, answer "yes", then I'm connected.
ok that would be basic phonetics put to use then....and that mutha fucker's been around for quite some timeIlocano wrote:
I was replying to Freezer7Pro's remark about having to dial a phone number.max wrote:
wow, a feature every decent phone since the late 90's hasIlocano wrote:
Thing is that, I don't even touch the phone to make calls. HTC Fuze has Voice Command. I just press the button on my bluetooth headset, tell it to call by name, answer "yes", then I'm connected.
Besides, Voice Command is different. It doesn't require an outside service, voice training, or any pre-recording. Just advanced voice recognition.
OK, find me a phone from the late 90's that has a self contained voice command feature that works as well as the ones from the last few years. Not using a service, tags or training. And must work through a bluetooth headset.baggs wrote:
ok that would be basic phonetics put to use then....and that mutha fucker's been around for quite some timeIlocano wrote:
I was replying to Freezer7Pro's remark about having to dial a phone number.max wrote:
wow, a feature every decent phone since the late 90's has
Besides, Voice Command is different. It doesn't require an outside service, voice training, or any pre-recording. Just advanced voice recognition.
Last edited by Ilocano (2009-02-25 16:06:22)
as-fucking-if i'm going to sift thru countless pages of bollocks trying to prove something which i reeeeelay couldn't give a flying fuck about. anyway, just having some fun with you. I'm no smart arse mate, don't worryIlocano wrote:
OK, find me a phone from the late 90's that has a self contained voice command feature that works as well as the ones from the last few years. Not using a service, tags or training.baggs wrote:
ok that would be basic phonetics put to use then....and that mutha fucker's been around for quite some timeIlocano wrote:
I was replying to Freezer7Pro's remark about having to dial a phone number.
Besides, Voice Command is different. It doesn't require an outside service, voice training, or any pre-recording. Just advanced voice recognition.
. No worries. You got caught in the crossfire. Shot to Max and his 90's comment.baggs wrote:
as-fucking-if i'm going to sift thru countless pages of bollocks trying to prove something which i reeeeelay couldn't give a flying fuck about. anyway, just having some fun with you. I'm no smart arse mate, don't worry
It's nothing advanced. The phone just knows the approximate waveform of the word "yes". Perhaps not even that, as all it needs to know is the difference between "yes" and "no"; high tone and low tone. It wouldn't surprise me if you could just say eee~ and it'd still take it as a yes.Ilocano wrote:
OK, find me a phone from the late 90's that has a self contained voice command feature that works as well as the ones from the last few years. Not using a service, tags or training. And must work through a bluetooth headset.baggs wrote:
ok that would be basic phonetics put to use then....and that mutha fucker's been around for quite some timeIlocano wrote:
I was replying to Freezer7Pro's remark about having to dial a phone number.
Besides, Voice Command is different. It doesn't require an outside service, voice training, or any pre-recording. Just advanced voice recognition.
It's more than that. It's actually a program from Microsoft called Voice Command. For example, in my address book. I have Barack Obama in the address book with phone numbers for his home, work, cell, car, company, work2, home2, radio, assistant. I would say, "Call Barack Obama at home", system would ask me to confirm, I'd answer "Yes" or "Next". No training, no tagging, or special service. Yes, this feature has been around for the last 3 or so years though, but buggy until just the last year or so. Definitely not in the late 90's.Freezer7Pro wrote:
It's nothing advanced. The phone just knows the approximate waveform of the word "yes". Perhaps not even that, as all it needs to know is the difference between "yes" and "no"; high tone and low tone. It wouldn't surprise me if you could just say eee~ and it'd still take it as a yes.Ilocano wrote:
OK, find me a phone from the late 90's that has a self contained voice command feature that works as well as the ones from the last few years. Not using a service, tags or training. And must work through a bluetooth headset.baggs wrote:
ok that would be basic phonetics put to use then....and that mutha fucker's been around for quite some time
mum: panz here 5 dollars for lunchGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Asus GTX 295 arrived in a package that puts EVGA in shame.
Immediately OC'ed to C666/S1436/M1202
Last edited by .Sup (2009-02-26 14:58:00)
more like... CUT THE DAMN FOREST BUAHAHAHAHA.Sup wrote:
mum: panz here 5 dollars for lunchGC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Asus GTX 295 arrived in a package that puts EVGA in shame.
Immediately OC'ed to C666/S1436/M1202
panz: *evil* haha 15 more dollars and i get a gtx 295
Nice card, but 3 year warranty keeps me away from ASUS.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Asus GTX 295 arrived in a package that puts EVGA in shame.
Immediately OC'ed to C666/S1436/M1202
what's wrong with 3 years warranty? its more than XFX and 2 years...Ilocano wrote:
Nice card, but 3 year warranty keeps me away from ASUS.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Asus GTX 295 arrived in a package that puts EVGA in shame.
Immediately OC'ed to C666/S1436/M1202
Last edited by GC_PaNzerFIN (2009-02-26 16:46:23)
most tech section members don't even need a 3 year warranty as they get rid of their card in half that time.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
what's wrong with 3 years warranty? its more than XFX and 2 years...Ilocano wrote:
Nice card, but 3 year warranty keeps me away from ASUS.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
Asus GTX 295 arrived in a package that puts EVGA in shame.
Immediately OC'ed to C666/S1436/M1202
Well, XFX, eVga and BFG are lifetime warranties, at least here in the States. It's not so much how long you will use the card, but rather, how confident the manufacturer is with their product. In my case though, I usually leave the graphics card with the build. New build, new graphics card.haffeysucks wrote:
most tech section members don't even need a 3 year warranty as they get rid of their card in half that time.GC_PaNzerFIN wrote:
what's wrong with 3 years warranty? its more than XFX and 2 years...Ilocano wrote:
Nice card, but 3 year warranty keeps me away from ASUS.
