I plan to shoot some of these when I visit my grandmother next, thanks for the info _b I was thinking maybe a stuffing made with bread, dried apricots, red wine and rosemary...sound alright?Diesel_dyk wrote:
Decapitation can stop the heart and the blood can affect the taste of the meat. but that might be TMI for some who frequent the grocer.
We're just being honest here, we've all eaten chicken, turkey, and probably duck, so whats a swan or two?Macbeth wrote:
Hmm my morality thread is now a thread about the taste of swan and meal preparation methods. I really didn't foresee this turn of events.
Really, you didn't? I suppose had I put money on it I would have guess it'd end up at Israel.Macbeth wrote:
Hmm my morality thread is now a thread about the taste of swan and meal preparation methods. I really didn't foresee this turn of events.
eitherghettoperson wrote:
Really, you didn't? I suppose had I put money on it I would have guess it'd end up at Israel.Macbeth wrote:
Hmm my morality thread is now a thread about the taste of swan and meal preparation methods. I really didn't foresee this turn of events.
Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
People who eat meat saying you wouldnt do it, you guys are hypocrits.
It's not necessarily a matter of hypocrisy, it's more of whether I could stomach decapitating a creature. I probably wouldn't have much of a problem simply shooting the bird, but to hold it down and cut its fucking head off? That's pretty damned gruesome.kylef wrote:
Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
People who eat meat saying you wouldnt do it, you guys are hypocrits.
can I keep the frog and kill the man with the hammer?Macbeth wrote:
Ok then how about an animal you can't eat? How much would somebody have to pay you in order for you to kill a frog with a hammer?
This frog
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/e … tyleri.jpg
With this hammer
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c … hammer.jpg
What happens if you do it for free?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
tbh you're a prick if you do it for a small sum, and a hypocrite if you do it for a large sum.
Well it was at first a question of how much would it take for you to give up your morals and kill an innocent animals. But people thought into it and started thinking "hey I can eat this swan". Damned economy.Varegg wrote:
What's this obcession with killing animals with tools?
Okay ...Macbeth wrote:
Well it was at first a question of how much would it take for you to give up your morals and kill an innocent animals. But people thought into it and started thinking "hey I can eat this swan". Damned economy.Varegg wrote:
What's this obcession with killing animals with tools?
So now I need a cute animal and a brutal way of killing it. So we could get back to the whole giving up your morals thing. Since after several strikes with a hammer you could not find anything on the frog to eat.
Great pick on the swan.....Macbeth wrote:
Well it was at first a question of how much would it take for you to give up your morals and kill an innocent animals. But people thought into it and started thinking "hey I can eat this swan". Damned economy.Varegg wrote:
What's this obcession with killing animals with tools?
So now I need a cute animal and a brutal way of killing it. So we could get back to the whole giving up your morals thing. Since after several strikes with a hammer you could not find anything on the frog to eat.
Why would I pay to kill dogs with a chainsaw.Varegg wrote:
Okay ...Macbeth wrote:
Well it was at first a question of how much would it take for you to give up your morals and kill an innocent animals. But people thought into it and started thinking "hey I can eat this swan". Damned economy.Varegg wrote:
What's this obcession with killing animals with tools?
So now I need a cute animal and a brutal way of killing it. So we could get back to the whole giving up your morals thing. Since after several strikes with a hammer you could not find anything on the frog to eat.
How much would you pay to kill these
http://www.hot-screensaver.com/wp-myima … uppies.jpg
With this
http://www.shadowlandtoys.com/catalog/i … eplica.jpg
Ok. Wow.Zimmer wrote:
Great pick on the swan.....Macbeth wrote:
Well it was at first a question of how much would it take for you to give up your morals and kill an innocent animals. But people thought into it and started thinking "hey I can eat this swan". Damned economy.Varegg wrote:
What's this obcession with killing animals with tools?
So now I need a cute animal and a brutal way of killing it. So we could get back to the whole giving up your morals thing. Since after several strikes with a hammer you could not find anything on the frog to eat.
Morals on INNOCENT animals? Where does all this innocent bullshit come from when you look at an animal? Just because it's an animal has nothing to do with its innocence. In addition to that, who the fuck cares if it's innocent or guilty. It's a damn animal.
Am I supposed to go "Awwwwwwwwww, look at that cute swan.... I couldn't kill it." ?
Fuck that. It's a swan. First thought "useless". Second thought "aggressive". Third thought? "Lets punch it in the stomach and chase it with a hammer."
Same applies to most animals. Yes, when it comes down to this, I have no morals. If a swan, one day, saves my life, I may look more lightly on it's case of "innocence".
I would pay YOU to be allowed to chainsaw puppies.Varegg wrote:
Okay ...Macbeth wrote:
Well it was at first a question of how much would it take for you to give up your morals and kill an innocent animals. But people thought into it and started thinking "hey I can eat this swan". Damned economy.Varegg wrote:
What's this obcession with killing animals with tools?
So now I need a cute animal and a brutal way of killing it. So we could get back to the whole giving up your morals thing. Since after several strikes with a hammer you could not find anything on the frog to eat.
How much would you pay to kill these
http://www.hot-screensaver.com/wp-myima … uppies.jpg
With this
http://www.shadowlandtoys.com/catalog/i … eplica.jpg
Yes because swans are raised and bred for the specific purpose of feeding people in facilities that are vastly regulated. This question exists in a vaccuum of thought and rationale where simple statements can apply unequivocally.kylef wrote:
Ajax_the_Great1 wrote:
People who eat meat saying you wouldnt do it, you guys are hypocrits.
Wood chipper, Fargo style.Varegg wrote:
Why would you not pay to kill annoying puppies with a chainsaw?
What if I throw in a helicopter? ... killing puppies with a chainsaw from a helicopter, I know I would pay to do that ...
