Macbeth
Banned
+2,444|5786

mafia996630 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:


I have read the page but don't see a line as to say Muhammed ordered the people to beheaded. Maybe i missed it, think you could help me out ?
You know this isn't exactly late breaking news.. It appears that the revisionist have successfully lobbied to change the caption.
Luckily they missed a spot.
http://i41.tinypic.com/2u4tt2r.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_ … _of_Medina
Ibn Ishaq is the source.


We would want the truth to offend anyone now would we?
Thanks for providing a source.

Lets me say firstly, i am simply debating the fact that Muhammad ordered the beheading of however many people. Firstly, approved is different from ordered (not a strong point).

Second, the source Ibn Ishaq is dismissed because he is considered to be a "Qadariyah". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qadariyah). Now apparently these people think "Allah cannot know a man's actions in advance" and "Qadaris also deny other core tenants of Sunni belief including the belief in the Punishment of the Grave", Now we all know Muslims and similar religions  think of God as all knowing & some of us know that 75 percent of world's muslims are Sunni (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Islam). Essentially what I am trying to say is that the dude in question is not really a muslim and therefore has lost credibility as a source.
The fuck I hope that is sarcasm.
It is stupid on so many levels.
Uzique
dasein.
+2,865|6671
Lowing do you make it a mission of yours to see how far you can twist and construe things inside your colon before shitting them out on the pages of BF2s fine-society?

How did the OP even warrant 5 pages of 'debate'?

Fuck.

Me.
libertarian benefit collector - anti-academic super-intellectual. http://mixlr.com/the-little-phrase/
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6801|132 and Bush

mafia996630 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:

I have read the page but don't see a line as to say Muhammed ordered the people to beheaded. Maybe i missed it, think you could help me out ?
You know this isn't exactly late breaking news.. It appears that the revisionist have successfully lobbied to change the caption.
Luckily they missed a spot.
http://i41.tinypic.com/2u4tt2r.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_ … _of_Medina
Ibn Ishaq is the source.


We would want the truth to offend anyone now would we?
Thanks for providing a source.

Lets me say firstly, i am simply debating the fact that Muhammad ordered the beheading of however many people. Firstly, approved is different from ordered (not a strong point).

Second, the source Ibn Ishaq is dismissed because he is considered to be a "Qadariyah". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qadariyah). Now apparently these people think "Allah cannot know a man's actions in advance" and "Qadaris also deny other core tenants of Sunni belief including the belief in the Punishment of the Grave", Now we all know Muslims and similar religions  think of God as all knowing & some of us know that 75 percent of world's muslims are Sunni (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Islam). Essentially what I am trying to say is that the dude in question is not really a muslim and therefore has lost credibility as a source.
Muslims consider him credible.

Sahi Buchari Hadiths #143, page-700 : Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, "in the war of Khaiber after the inhabitants of Banu Qurayza was surrendered, Allah's apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal).. Among the captives Rayhana a beautiful young Jewish girl was taken by Allah's Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom was her Mohr."

"Sirat A, Rasul"page 464

"When Banu Qurayza Jewish tribe was surrendered (627 A.D.) unconditionally, the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches tying theirs both hands with their necks. This beheading went on until the apostle made an end of them. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. Apparently Muhammad himself worked on the digging of the trench into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. But he (Muhammad) did not only take part in those preparations, the formulation of the text states but also participated himself in beading of at least two of the leading Jews."
Xbone Stormsurgezz
AussieReaper
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
+5,761|6353|what

Uzique wrote:

Lowing do you make it a mission of yours to see how far you can twist and construe things inside your colon before shitting them out on the pages of BF2s fine-society?

How did the OP even warrant 5 pages of 'debate'?

Fuck.

Me.
Better than another Obama thread though. lol
https://i.imgur.com/maVpUMN.png
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6700|so randum

AussieReaper wrote:

Uzique wrote:

Lowing do you make it a mission of yours to see how far you can twist and construe things inside your colon before shitting them out on the pages of BF2s fine-society?

How did the OP even warrant 5 pages of 'debate'?

Fuck.

Me.
Better than another Obama thread though. lol
i never thought i'd miss the muslim threads.
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
FEOS
Bellicose Yankee Air Pirate
+1,182|6611|'Murka

Wow. Amazing how a thread grows when I am at work and unable to view or post.

CBA to read five pages, so...

When I saw the story in the news (before this thread was created), I thought "What a sick fuck...what happened there?"

I didn't automatically assume that he was Muslim. I honestly thought that beheadings in the US are fairly infrequent, so that would explain this making the news the way it did.

When I saw that the guy was Muslim, I immediately wondered "Is he just a sick fuck or is this an honor killing?"

Could be either one. And that's a damn shame.
“Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
― Albert Einstein

Doing the popular thing is not always right. Doing the right thing is not always popular
mafia996630
© 2009 Jeff Minard
+319|6964|d

Kmarion wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

You know this isn't exactly late breaking news.. It appears that the revisionist have successfully lobbied to change the caption.
Luckily they missed a spot.
http://i41.tinypic.com/2u4tt2r.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_ … _of_Medina
Ibn Ishaq is the source.


We would want the truth to offend anyone now would we?
Thanks for providing a source.

Lets me say firstly, i am simply debating the fact that Muhammad ordered the beheading of however many people. Firstly, approved is different from ordered (not a strong point).

Second, the source Ibn Ishaq is dismissed because he is considered to be a "Qadariyah". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qadariyah). Now apparently these people think "Allah cannot know a man's actions in advance" and "Qadaris also deny other core tenants of Sunni belief including the belief in the Punishment of the Grave", Now we all know Muslims and similar religions  think of God as all knowing & some of us know that 75 percent of world's muslims are Sunni (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Islam). Essentially what I am trying to say is that the dude in question is not really a muslim and therefore has lost credibility as a source.
Muslims consider him credible.

Sahi Buchari Hadiths #143, page-700 : Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, "in the war of Khaiber after the inhabitants of Banu Qurayza was surrendered, Allah's apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal).. Among the captives Rayhana a beautiful young Jewish girl was taken by Allah's Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom was her Mohr."

"Sirat A, Rasul"page 464

"When Banu Qurayza Jewish tribe was surrendered (627 A.D.) unconditionally, the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches tying theirs both hands with their necks. This beheading went on until the apostle made an end of them. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. Apparently Muhammad himself worked on the digging of the trench into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. But he (Muhammad) did not only take part in those preparations, the formulation of the text states but also participated himself in beading of at least two of the leading Jews."
What makes you think he is a credible source in relation to "Sahih al-Bukhari" ? Of all the names that are mentioned on the wiki link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahi_Bukhari), i have yet to find Ibn Ishaq. Also what does the 1st paragraph you posted have to do with anything ?

As for the second paragraph, which was probz gotten from [http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/skm/beheading.htm]  I was reading it until i read

"Apparently Muhammad himself worked on the digging of the trench into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. But he (Muhammad) did not only take part in those preparations, the formulation of the text states but also participated himself in beading of at least two of the leading Jews.""

WTF, where the fuk did apparently come from ? When writing about someone life, you don't write apparently he did that/this. Did it say that on page 464 of that book or did someone add it in when writing that article. For some reason that bit sounds fishy.

Last edited by mafia996630 (2009-02-17 17:27:20)

usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6962

DonFck wrote:

You know this from personal experience and having seen many beheadings in crapistan.
nope.  its well documented.  go look around then.  its not my fault this is something new to you.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6962

AussieReaper wrote:

usmarine wrote:

no.....

jesus stop with the mexican crap.  my god.

beheadings happen in the tribal regions on crapistan almost everyday.
Only the tribal regions?

So it's not an accepted part of their culture.
no nice try to take things out of context.  i was responding to ATG about amounts of head chopping per day. nice try though
Turquoise
O Canada
+1,596|6605|North Carolina
Mohammed was a warlord....  Is it really that hard to believe he killed a lot of people?
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6827|Canada

lowing wrote:

How about some honesty? WHen you hear of a stoning, a beheading, you think of Islamic culture. Now go ahead and lie to me and tell me ya don't
tbh when i think of beheading, i think of that crazy asian on the greyhound bus who slaughtered the innocent sleeping man next to him. then the taliban. stoning, i think of the bible, q'uran, basically any religious literature.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6801|132 and Bush

mafia996630 wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:

Thanks for providing a source.

Lets me say firstly, i am simply debating the fact that Muhammad ordered the beheading of however many people. Firstly, approved is different from ordered (not a strong point).

Second, the source Ibn Ishaq is dismissed because he is considered to be a "Qadariyah". (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibn_Ishaq) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qadariyah). Now apparently these people think "Allah cannot know a man's actions in advance" and "Qadaris also deny other core tenants of Sunni belief including the belief in the Punishment of the Grave", Now we all know Muslims and similar religions  think of God as all knowing & some of us know that 75 percent of world's muslims are Sunni (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_Islam). Essentially what I am trying to say is that the dude in question is not really a muslim and therefore has lost credibility as a source.
Muslims consider him credible.

Sahi Buchari Hadiths #143, page-700 : Sulaiman Ibne Harb…Aannas Ibne Malek (ra) narrated, "in the war of Khaiber after the inhabitants of Banu Qurayza was surrendered, Allah's apostle killed all the able/adult men, and he (prophet) took all women and children as captives (Ghani mateer maal).. Among the captives Rayhana a beautiful young Jewish girl was taken by Allah's Apostle as booty whom He married after freeing her and her freedom was her Mohr."

"Sirat A, Rasul"page 464

"When Banu Qurayza Jewish tribe was surrendered (627 A.D.) unconditionally, the apostle confined them in Medina in the quarter of al-Harith, a woman of B. al-Najjar. Then the apostle went out to the market of Medina (which is still its market today) and dug trenches in it. Then he sent for them and struck off their heads in those trenches as they were brought out to him in batches tying theirs both hands with their necks. This beheading went on until the apostle made an end of them. There were 600 or 700 in all, though some put the figure as high as 800 or 900. Apparently Muhammad himself worked on the digging of the trench into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. But he (Muhammad) did not only take part in those preparations, the formulation of the text states but also participated himself in beading of at least two of the leading Jews."
What makes you think he is a credible source in relation to "Sahih al-Bukhari" ? Of all the names that are mentioned on the wiki link (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahi_Bukhari), i have yet to find Ibn Ishaq. Also what does the 1st paragraph you posted have to do with anything ?

As for the second paragraph, which was probz gotten from [http://www.mukto-mona.com/Articles/skm/beheading.htm]  I was reading it until i read

"Apparently Muhammad himself worked on the digging of the trench into which the massacred Jews were to be thrown. But he (Muhammad) did not only take part in those preparations, the formulation of the text states but also participated himself in beading of at least two of the leading Jews.""

WTF, where the fuk did apparently come from ? When writing about someone life, you don't write apparently he did that/this. Did it say that on page 464 of that book or did someone add it in when writing that article. For some reason that bit sounds fishy.
I'm trying to get a copy of "Life of Muhammad : A Translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah".. will be good reading and also a good way to put this to rest. Not avail on kindle . Rest assured I'm going straight for 461.
https://i39.tinypic.com/wj809u.png

We can get through this together mafia.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Warhammer
Member
+18|5881
Apparently Islam experts and psychologists think it was Muslim honor killing.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494785,00.html
FatherTed
xD
+3,936|6700|so randum

Warhammer wrote:

Apparently Islam experts and psychologists think it was Muslim honor killing.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494785,00.html
1) Islamic experts - lol
2) foxnews?
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Warhammer
Member
+18|5881

FatherTed wrote:

Warhammer wrote:

Apparently Islam experts and psychologists think it was Muslim honor killing.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494785,00.html
1) Islamic experts - lol
2) foxnews?
?
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6827|Canada

Warhammer wrote:

FatherTed wrote:

Warhammer wrote:

Apparently Islam experts and psychologists think it was Muslim honor killing.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,494785,00.html
1) Islamic experts - lol
2) foxnews?
?
ted meant, fox news is not a credible source for islamic material.
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6962

destruktion_6143 wrote:

ted meant, fox news is not a credible source for islamic material.
ted would be wrong.  the bbc is not a credible source for islamic news.  look it up.  some of you know what they did.
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6827|Canada
i get my news from the 100% credible source of MSNBC. true story.
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6801|132 and Bush

destruktion_6143 wrote:

i get my news from the 100% credible source of MSNBC. true story.
No.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6962

Kmarion wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

i get my news from the 100% credible source of MSNBC. true story.
No.
R. Maddow deserves an award tbh
destruktion_6143
Was ist Loos?
+154|6827|Canada

Kmarion wrote:

destruktion_6143 wrote:

i get my news from the 100% credible source of MSNBC. true story.
No.
ok.. umm how bout unbiased?

someone like keith olberman cant possibly be one sided?
usmarine
Banned
+2,785|6962

destruktion_6143 wrote:

someone like keith olberman cant possibly be one sided?
i assume you are being a nozzle on purpose yes?
Beduin
Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid
+510|5950|شمال

Kmarion wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:

I have read the page but don't see a line as to say Muhammed ordered the people to beheaded. Maybe i missed it, think you could help me out ?
You know this isn't exactly late breaking news.. It appears that the revisionist have successfully lobbied to change the caption.
Luckily they missed a spot.
http://i41.tinypic.com/2u4tt2r.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_ … _of_Medina
Ibn Ishaq is the source.
We would want the truth to offend anyone now would we?
There were a treaty between the Prophet (May peace be upon him) and Bani Qurayza, that Bani Qurayza broke.
الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic
Kmar
Truth is my Bitch
+5,695|6801|132 and Bush

Beduin wrote:

Kmarion wrote:

mafia996630 wrote:


I have read the page but don't see a line as to say Muhammed ordered the people to beheaded. Maybe i missed it, think you could help me out ?
You know this isn't exactly late breaking news.. It appears that the revisionist have successfully lobbied to change the caption.
Luckily they missed a spot.
http://i41.tinypic.com/2u4tt2r.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_ … _of_Medina
Ibn Ishaq is the source.
We would want the truth to offend anyone now would we?
There were a treaty between the Prophet (May peace be upon him) and Bani Qurayza, that Bani Qurayza broke.
So I've read.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Varegg
Support fanatic :-)
+2,206|7010|Nårvei

The point Kmarion is that whenever a Muslim does something we tie it to religion and how aweful that is when we infact have an equally violent history and present ourself regarding the same issues ...
Wait behind the line ..............................................................

Board footer

Privacy Policy - © 2024 Jeff Minard