I don't even agree that it solves Cancer, I think it's a crutch for weak minded individuals to feel all warm and fuzzy and think they're helping the world. The reality is me recycling a can of Pepsi is more helpful.AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. You'd have to be quite ignorant to think something like that, mek.Mekstizzle wrote:
Folding at home isn't all about solving Cancer anyway, I don't know where people got that idea from
Last edited by andy12 (2009-02-15 08:17:21)
Then learn to get your points across without personaly attacking someone, tbh.Finray wrote:
I only ever intended it to be a way of getting my point across. Re-read when I said it,ThomasMorgan wrote:
Don't tell someone you hope they get cancer and then try to play it off as a clever way of getting your point across.
It's a personal attack no matter what context it's in.I didn't say it like "I hope you get cancer because you're an idiot/bad person/I don't agree with you", I said it so that he would then think of people who are folding, and doing their bit. Then he would maybe realise how not pointless the whole operation is.Finray wrote:
Seriously, I hope you get cancer, and then you can think about the time you denounced f@h as flawed..
Look at it this way:andy12 wrote:
I don't even agree that it solves Cancer, I think it's a crutch for weak minded individuals to feel all warm and fuzzy and think they're helping the world. The reality is me recycling a can of Pepsi is more helpful.AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. You'd have to be quite ignorant to think something like that, mek.Mekstizzle wrote:
Folding at home isn't all about solving Cancer anyway, I don't know where people got that idea from
You're just not getting it.andy12 wrote:
I don't even agree that it solves Cancer, I think it's a crutch for weak minded individuals to feel all warm and fuzzy and think they're helping the world. The reality is me recycling a can of Pepsi is more helpful.AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. You'd have to be quite ignorant to think something like that, mek.Mekstizzle wrote:
Folding at home isn't all about solving Cancer anyway, I don't know where people got that idea from
I didn't say you did agree that it solves cancer, not sure why you took my post as directed at you with that one.andy12 wrote:
I don't even agree that it solves Cancer, I think it's a crutch for weak minded individuals to feel all warm and fuzzy and think they're helping the world. The reality is me recycling a can of Pepsi is more helpful.AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. You'd have to be quite ignorant to think something like that, mek.Mekstizzle wrote:
Folding at home isn't all about solving Cancer anyway, I don't know where people got that idea from
Kiss kiss.JoshP wrote:
Srsly, ban the op
he's just an angry muppet who spams nonsense about why F@h is bad
when f@h is awsm rite?
and if he has a better thread, why didn't he post it and get it in the poll and get it number one, amirite?
Spoiler (highlight to read):
inb4 we all get banned
/agree with finray
but folding does increase the wattage used, no?Finray wrote:
Kiss kiss.JoshP wrote:
Srsly, ban the op
he's just an angry muppet who spams nonsense about why F@h is bad
when f@h is awsm rite?
and if he has a better thread, why didn't he post it and get it in the poll and get it number one, amirite?
Spoiler (highlight to read):
inb4 we all get banned
/agree with finray
@ Ted, I donno lol, parents pay it.
I figure it hasn't gone up any, as I don't leave my computer on folding. I only fold when I'm on my computer anyway.
/thisJoshP wrote:
Srsly, ban the op
he's just an angry muppet who spams nonsense
Because it's that time of the month and you've been directing what comes with the menstrual cycle at me via the pm system for an hour, it was probably aimed at me as I'm the OP. Go ahead and say it was aimed at someone else though, since it's me that's brought this up and argued my side with little help from 1 or 2 others. Safe to say it was aimed at me.AussieReaper wrote:
I didn't say you did agree that it solves cancer, not sure why you took my post as directed at you with that one.andy12 wrote:
I don't even agree that it solves Cancer, I think it's a crutch for weak minded individuals to feel all warm and fuzzy and think they're helping the world. The reality is me recycling a can of Pepsi is more helpful.AussieReaper wrote:
Yeah. You'd have to be quite ignorant to think something like that, mek.
Anyway, those weak minded individuals have more important things to worry about than making sure they recycle a pepsi can, for you see they are smart enough to know which bin to place recyclable garbage.
Unless you go over the top, not much, really. A normal gaming-grade computer uses perhaps 250-300W idle and 400-450W load.FatherTed wrote:
this is a general question, whats the increased leccy bill add up to?
Yeah, but that's a margional increase. Maybe an extra £1 a year.Jenspm wrote:
but folding does increase the wattage used, no?Finray wrote:
Kiss kiss.JoshP wrote:
Srsly, ban the op
he's just an angry muppet who spams nonsense about why F@h is bad
when f@h is awsm rite?
and if he has a better thread, why didn't he post it and get it in the poll and get it number one, amirite?
Spoiler (highlight to read):
inb4 we all get banned
/agree with finray
@ Ted, I donno lol, parents pay it.
I figure it hasn't gone up any, as I don't leave my computer on folding. I only fold when I'm on my computer anyway.
kk cheers.Freezer7Pro wrote:
Unless you go over the top, not much, really. A normal gaming-grade computer uses perhaps 250-300W idle and 400-450W load.FatherTed wrote:
this is a general question, whats the increased leccy bill add up to?
No, it can easily add up to another £50 a year. All depends on your living conditions.Finray wrote:
Yeah, but that's a margional increase. Maybe an extra £1 a year.Jenspm wrote:
but folding does increase the wattage used, no?Finray wrote:
Kiss kiss.
@ Ted, I donno lol, parents pay it.
I figure it hasn't gone up any, as I don't leave my computer on folding. I only fold when I'm on my computer anyway.
But that is a certain amount of CO2, and if thousands of people are leading out, just a few grams of CO2 extra because of this, it can get nasty quite quick.Finray wrote:
Yeah, but that's a margional increase. Maybe an extra £1 a year.Jenspm wrote:
but folding does increase the wattage used, no?Finray wrote:
Kiss kiss.
@ Ted, I donno lol, parents pay it.
I figure it hasn't gone up any, as I don't leave my computer on folding. I only fold when I'm on my computer anyway.
Weird, it was you who first sent me a pm, 24 hour boy. I'd be genuinely shocked if you could tell me how many days were in a month, for any month of the year, or even how many minutes are in an hour. Your concept of time is truly unique among even the Theoretical physicists of the world.andy12 wrote:
Because it's that time of the month and you've been directing what comes with the menstrual cycle at me via the pm system for an hour, it was probably aimed at me as I'm the OP. Go ahead and say it was aimed at someone else though, since it's me that's brought this up and argued my side with little help from 1 or 2 others. Safe to say it was aimed at me.
Oh noez I don't know which is recycle bin. Come on, you can do better than that...
F@H does not for all intents and purposes increase global Co2 levels.Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
But that is a certain amount of CO2, and if thousands of people are leading out, just a few grams of CO2 extra because of this, it can get nasty quite quick.Finray wrote:
Yeah, but that's a margional increase. Maybe an extra £1 a year.Jenspm wrote:
but folding does increase the wattage used, no?
Care to address the questions? Where you trying to indirectly insult me or are you just going to be a smart ass?AussieReaper wrote:
Weird, it was you who first sent me a pm, 24 hour boy. I'd be genuinely shocked if you could tell me how many days were in a month, for any month of the year, or even how many minutes are in an hour. Your concept of time is truly unique among even the Theoretical physicists of the world.andy12 wrote:
Because it's that time of the month and you've been directing what comes with the menstrual cycle at me via the pm system for an hour, it was probably aimed at me as I'm the OP. Go ahead and say it was aimed at someone else though, since it's me that's brought this up and argued my side with little help from 1 or 2 others. Safe to say it was aimed at me.
Oh noez I don't know which is recycle bin. Come on, you can do better than that...
More electricity use, gives more CO2.FatherTed wrote:
F@H does not for all intents and purposes increase global Co2 levels.Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
But that is a certain amount of CO2, and if thousands of people are leading out, just a few grams of CO2 extra because of this, it can get nasty quite quick.Finray wrote:
Yeah, but that's a margional increase. Maybe an extra £1 a year.
Please read up on some facts and figures before you give opinions as truth.
look, noLieutenant_Jensen wrote:
More electricity use, gives more CO2.FatherTed wrote:
F@H does not for all intents and purposes increase global Co2 levels.Lieutenant_Jensen wrote:
But that is a certain amount of CO2, and if thousands of people are leading out, just a few grams of CO2 extra because of this, it can get nasty quite quick.
Please read up on some facts and figures before you give opinions as truth.
I simply stated that one would have to be ignorant to believe that F@H was solely directed at Cancer research. Something you easily disputed as not in fact believing yourself and thus not in fact being one of those said ignorant persons.andy12 wrote:
Care to address the questions? Where you trying to indirectly insult me or are you just going to be a smart ass?AussieReaper wrote:
Weird, it was you who first sent me a pm, 24 hour boy. I'd be genuinely shocked if you could tell me how many days were in a month, for any month of the year, or even how many minutes are in an hour. Your concept of time is truly unique among even the Theoretical physicists of the world.andy12 wrote:
Because it's that time of the month and you've been directing what comes with the menstrual cycle at me via the pm system for an hour, it was probably aimed at me as I'm the OP. Go ahead and say it was aimed at someone else though, since it's me that's brought this up and argued my side with little help from 1 or 2 others. Safe to say it was aimed at me.
Oh noez I don't know which is recycle bin. Come on, you can do better than that...