BF2S Forums Democracy Versus Republic Versus Mobocracy

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

It's funny how you constantly excuse your arguments lowing ... if it's classified as a terrorist act it is a terrorist act no matter how you twist it, doesn't matter if it is a foreign muslim or a native american that commits the act ...

you know the terrorism he is talking about.  why you bush bashers ALWAYS have to bring up random acts of domestic crap that most people in the country, and for that matter the world have never heard of because you cant admitt no embassies or building were blown to shreds.

lowing is generalizing terrorism in one post and then singles out muslims as the only real terrorists in another, it's called inconsistency ...

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

lowing is generalizing terrorism in one post and then singles out muslims as the only real terrorists in another, it's called inconsistency ...

speaking for the US (which is the only country I care about) muslims terrorists are the biggest threat to us.  some white kid with a pipe bomb in oregon is not going to keep my up at night.

The point is the pipe bomb guy is still classified as a terrorist and that is what lowing doesn't understand ...

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

The point is the pipe bomb guy is still classified as a terrorist and that is what lowing doesn't understand ...

the guy would be charged with acts of terrorism of something like that.  i dont know anyone with a brain that considers a person who puts a pipe bomb in a mail box a terrorist.

I'd say he's just a pissed off dude.

Varegg wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

The point is the pipe bomb guy is still classified as a terrorist and that is what lowing doesn't understand ...

the guy would be charged with acts of terrorism of something like that.  i dont know anyone with a brain that considers a person who puts a pipe bomb in a mail box a terrorist.

You can't argue the meaning of a preset definition, a terrorist is a terrorist foreign or domestic doesn't matter ...

Yeah he would be classified as a terrorist, but the amount of threat assessed is quite minimal.

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

You can't argue the meaning of a preset definition, a terrorist is a terrorist foreign or domestic doesn't matter ...

hmmm...

no i can argue it.  its like calling something a hate crime.

Giftwrap it and call it whatever you like ...

Cybargs wrote:

Just coz I'm asian you think hitting me would be different from hitting a white guy. racist motherfucker.

ya i know.  thats my point.  the term hate crime is about as retarded as calling some of those examples terrorists.

m3thod wrote:

Your bankers have fucked your country in ways that mooslim terrorists could only dream of sweetcheeks. 

Reality check.

yup.  same with the rest of the world.  christ iceland collapsed and denmark or whatever country it was had their govt shut down.  not to mention all the bail outs in your country.  still, not the point.

m3thod wrote:

Why not?  Is the only threat you face that is worth considering from crazy mooslims with a death wish?  I don't think so.

erm...biggest threat when talking about terrorism.

usmarine wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Why not?  Is the only threat you face that is worth considering from crazy mooslims with a death wish?  I don't think so.

erm...biggest threat when talking about terrorism.

I would think domestic terrorists are more of a threat than the mooslims.  They are already there. They look like the natives.  They speak the language.  They can obtain weapons and large quantities of 'ingredients' without arousing suspicion.  They can travel and obtain transport without arousing suspicion.

m3thod wrote:

usmarine wrote:

m3thod wrote:

Why not?  Is the only threat you face that is worth considering from crazy mooslims with a death wish?  I don't think so.

erm...biggest threat when talking about terrorism.

I would think domestic terrorists are more of a threat than the mooslims.  They are already there. They look like the natives.  They speak the language.  They can obtain weapons and large quantities of 'ingredients' without arousing suspicion.  They can travel and obtain transport without arousing suspicion.

ATF

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine wrote:

speaking for the US (which is the only country I care about) muslims terrorists are the biggest threat to us.  some white kid with a pipe bomb in oregon is not going to keep my up at night.

Muslims keep you up at night? lol

Marine faps to ozzie B.  Why am i not surprised.

FatherTed wrote:

usmarine wrote:

Varegg wrote:

The point is the pipe bomb guy is still classified as a terrorist and that is what lowing doesn't understand ...

the guy would be charged with acts of terrorism of something like that.  i dont know anyone with a brain that considers a person who puts a pipe bomb in a mail box a terrorist.

ira/pira/rira/uvf/udf/etc etc etc

There is still a hole in the argument though: if terrorists occasionally use pipe bombs that doesn't mean anyone with a pipebomb is a terrorist (though in this particular case I'd say they are).

Varegg wrote:

You can't argue the meaning of a preset definition, a terrorist is a terrorist foreign or domestic doesn't matter ...

I am inclined to disagree with this, not because what it claim isn't true, but because it completely disregards who set out the respective definition. If someone is considered a terrorist by one country's law, that doesn't necesarily mean he is a terrorist in the eyes of any given subject of any given country thousands of miles away. For example, the Kurdic PKK has been recognized as a terrorist organization by the US. While some PKK elements certainly act 'out of line', I have strong reservations about labeling the entire PKK as 'terrorist'.

CameronPoe wrote:

usmarine wrote:

speaking for the US (which is the only country I care about) muslims terrorists are the biggest threat to us.  some white kid with a pipe bomb in oregon is not going to keep my up at night.

Muslims keep you up at night? lol

its a figure of speech lolz