you're talking about, like, everyone in the bf2 section hereMrAnderson wrote:
The guy can barely speak english, I wouldn't take anything he says seriously.
lolol
Pages: 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 21
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- BF2 1.50 patch news
lolol
BF2 is almost 4 years old, a 1.5 patch that everyone is crying about wont do the BF community or their profits any good. Sorry guys, that patch is way overdue in my book. Two years to be exact. I have waited for 1.5 long enough to realize that it wont be enough for me to get me to come back to BF2. Lets put it this way: If 1.5 was to be released,and EA gives a rats ass about the BF community, they would do everything in their power to make 1.5 available since they have a fat wallet. and DICE is no different either. thats a cold reality that most of you here at BF2s dont comprehend. in my book, EA has literally packed up their tents and moved on in their "gaming" bandwagon.
A perfect example of that, they made BF: Bad company, and now a New BF:BC and BF1943 is comming in the near future.
The only way, EA/ DICE are going to get more people to play BF games is to make a epic BF game like the one they made in 2005. PERIOD!!!!!!! not this bullshit small microwavable meals of a game like BF: bad company, or BF: 1943 which 1942 was awsome. But with the economy as it is, that right there is the nail to the coffin. EA/DICE had one more chance in 2006 to make things right with the Battlefield Community: BF2142. and boy did they really miss the mark there. I played 2142, and ill tell you this, it does not have the same feel of BF2.
lets put this another way: there are very few game designers that are willing to spend all that money and man power to patch a game they released for the next 4+ years.....
A perfect example of that, they made BF: Bad company, and now a New BF:BC and BF1943 is comming in the near future.
The only way, EA/ DICE are going to get more people to play BF games is to make a epic BF game like the one they made in 2005. PERIOD!!!!!!! not this bullshit small microwavable meals of a game like BF: bad company, or BF: 1943 which 1942 was awsome. But with the economy as it is, that right there is the nail to the coffin. EA/DICE had one more chance in 2006 to make things right with the Battlefield Community: BF2142. and boy did they really miss the mark there. I played 2142, and ill tell you this, it does not have the same feel of BF2.
lets put this another way: there are very few game designers that are willing to spend all that money and man power to patch a game they released for the next 4+ years.....
2142 was an improvement in many areas tbhspecialistx2324 wrote:
BF2 is almost 4 years old, a 1.5 patch that everyone is crying about wont do the BF community or their profits any good. Sorry guys, that patch is way overdue in my book. Two years to be exact. I have waited for 1.5 long enough to realize that it wont be enough for me to get me to come back to BF2. Lets put it this way: If 1.5 was to be released,and EA gives a rats ass about the BF community, they would do everything in their power to make 1.5 available since they have a fat wallet. and DICE is no different either. thats a cold reality that most of you here at BF2s dont comprehend. in my book, EA has literally packed up their tents and moved on in their "gaming" bandwagon.
A perfect example of that, they made BF: Bad company, and now a New BF:BC and BF1943 is comming in the near future.
The only way, EA/ DICE are going to get more people to play BF games is to make a epic BF game like the one they made in 2005. PERIOD!!!!!!! not this bullshit small microwavable meals of a game like BF: bad company, or BF: 1943 which 1942 was awsome. But with the economy as it is, that right there is the nail to the coffin. EA/DICE had one more chance in 2006 to make things right with the Battlefield Community: BF2142. and boy did they really miss the mark there. I played 2142, and ill tell you this, it does not have the same feel of BF2.
lets put this another way: there are very few game designers that are willing to spend all that money and man power to patch a game they released for the next 4+ years.....
Small hourglass island
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
Always raining and foggy
Use an umbrella
All I can think of is Squad Beacons and Titan mode.FatherTed wrote:
2142 was an improvement in many areas tbhspecialistx2324 wrote:
BF2 is almost 4 years old, a 1.5 patch that everyone is crying about wont do the BF community or their profits any good. Sorry guys, that patch is way overdue in my book. Two years to be exact. I have waited for 1.5 long enough to realize that it wont be enough for me to get me to come back to BF2. Lets put it this way: If 1.5 was to be released,and EA gives a rats ass about the BF community, they would do everything in their power to make 1.5 available since they have a fat wallet. and DICE is no different either. thats a cold reality that most of you here at BF2s dont comprehend. in my book, EA has literally packed up their tents and moved on in their "gaming" bandwagon.
A perfect example of that, they made BF: Bad company, and now a New BF:BC and BF1943 is comming in the near future.
The only way, EA/ DICE are going to get more people to play BF games is to make a epic BF game like the one they made in 2005. PERIOD!!!!!!! not this bullshit small microwavable meals of a game like BF: bad company, or BF: 1943 which 1942 was awsome. But with the economy as it is, that right there is the nail to the coffin. EA/DICE had one more chance in 2006 to make things right with the Battlefield Community: BF2142. and boy did they really miss the mark there. I played 2142, and ill tell you this, it does not have the same feel of BF2.
lets put this another way: there are very few game designers that are willing to spend all that money and man power to patch a game they released for the next 4+ years.....
squad becons: and i have seen this over and over. People dont destroy squad becons, they camp around it so when you land, its spawnkilling gallore.FFLink13 wrote:
All I can think of is Squad Beacons and Titan mode.FatherTed wrote:
2142 was an improvement in many areas tbhspecialistx2324 wrote:
BF2 is almost 4 years old, a 1.5 patch that everyone is crying about wont do the BF community or their profits any good. Sorry guys, that patch is way overdue in my book. Two years to be exact. I have waited for 1.5 long enough to realize that it wont be enough for me to get me to come back to BF2. Lets put it this way: If 1.5 was to be released,and EA gives a rats ass about the BF community, they would do everything in their power to make 1.5 available since they have a fat wallet. and DICE is no different either. thats a cold reality that most of you here at BF2s dont comprehend. in my book, EA has literally packed up their tents and moved on in their "gaming" bandwagon.
A perfect example of that, they made BF: Bad company, and now a New BF:BC and BF1943 is comming in the near future.
The only way, EA/ DICE are going to get more people to play BF games is to make a epic BF game like the one they made in 2005. PERIOD!!!!!!! not this bullshit small microwavable meals of a game like BF: bad company, or BF: 1943 which 1942 was awsome. But with the economy as it is, that right there is the nail to the coffin. EA/DICE had one more chance in 2006 to make things right with the Battlefield Community: BF2142. and boy did they really miss the mark there. I played 2142, and ill tell you this, it does not have the same feel of BF2.
lets put this another way: there are very few game designers that are willing to spend all that money and man power to patch a game they released for the next 4+ years.....
titan mode: its an awsome concept, but badly executed on DICE's part. especially when the tittans are soo close to each other where you get 300+ping.
Smoother engine, some cool vehicles which actually promoted teamwork and were less 'whoreable', rewards for teamwork in the form of squad bonuses, customizable kits, cool upgrades, varied weapons, lack of nadespam, 'claymores' could be avoided by careful movement, etc, etc...
I will admit I didn't play it for anywhere near as long as BF2, but I did see a lot of potential in 2142 8)
I will admit I didn't play it for anywhere near as long as BF2, but I did see a lot of potential in 2142 8)
I think in the 1.5 patch they should make the J-10 have worse turning than the F-35, give the assault class the G36E and L85 and give the medic the G3 and another gun, make it so you can crawl over clays without setting them off, and make it so you can have only 2 grenades and so support can only resupply bullets not explosives, make it so you cant jump when you have no energy, make chainguns have more splash damage and get rid of all the hackers
I totally agree with you herbal! That would make more people play bf2 in my opinion because a lot of people like the more tactical types of games. I know PB does some what to help keep hackers away, but hackers make their own undetected hacks. I think that EA should make something that detects anything out of the ordinary. Maybe that will help. Hackers are slowly killing this game. The end is near if EA doesn't do something..
Peace and Smoke Weed.
Peace and Smoke Weed.
Hackers will always be a problem, in any game...they will always be one step ahead of even the best anti-cheat system.
They have promised to address the commander hack/server crash issues, by tightening up server-side security...let's hope it works.
They have promised to address the commander hack/server crash issues, by tightening up server-side security...let's hope it works.
all i want is for them to fix the netcode. is that even possible to do in a patch?
If it were, then you would imagine that they would have fixed it in one of the many patches that have come before this one.
This one (1.5) isn't coming. EA/DICE just don't give a fuck.
Thx! As i see you are preatty optimistic...Pubic wrote:
This one (1.5) isn't coming. EA/DICE just don't give a fuck.
That's when jumping is the most beneficial...H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
make it so you cant jump when you have no energy
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Holy fuck.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
I think in the 1.5 patch they should make the J-10 have worse turning than the F-35, give the assault class the G36E and L85 and give the medic the G3 and another gun, make it so you can crawl over clays without setting them off, and make it so you can have only 2 grenades and so support can only resupply bullets not explosives, make it so you cant jump when you have no energy, make chainguns have more splash damage and get rid of all the hackers
You really hit the nail on the head.
That's fucking perfect.
Maybe not the jump thing, though.
Last edited by FFLink13 (2009-02-10 07:04:48)
H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
I think in the 1.5 patch they should make the J-10 have worse turning than the F-35, give the assault class the G36E and L85 and give the medic the G3 and another gun, make it so you can crawl over clays without setting them off, and make it so you can have only 2 grenades and so support can only resupply bullets not explosives, make it so you cant jump when you have no energy, make chainguns have more splash damage and get rid of all the hackers
that's not perfect, that's stupid, that's the sort of thinking that lead to mods like walk sim being madeFFLink13 wrote:
Holy fuck.H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:
I think in the 1.5 patch they should make the J-10 have worse turning than the F-35, give the assault class the G36E and L85 and give the medic the G3 and another gun, make it so you can crawl over clays without setting them off, and make it so you can have only 2 grenades and so support can only resupply bullets not explosives, make it so you cant jump when you have no energy, make chainguns have more splash damage and get rid of all the hackers
You really hit the nail on the head.
That's fucking perfect.
Maybe not the jump thing, though.
Personally DICE should definately limit the number of grenades, it's getting ridiculous.
Why do so many people say "DICE fix this it's gay", or "EA fix this people spam it too much"
If you care so passionately about your certain fix and think it will improve the gameplay, go make a mod which changes it. If it's awsm everyone will play it, and maybe DICE ought to actually listen to your suggestions. But the more likely outcome is that you're just another person bitching about bits of the game, and DICE should ignore you and actually fix the more important issues like netcode or crashes/stability instead of fixing weapons to suit one particular person.
If you care so passionately about your certain fix and think it will improve the gameplay, go make a mod which changes it. If it's awsm everyone will play it, and maybe DICE ought to actually listen to your suggestions. But the more likely outcome is that you're just another person bitching about bits of the game, and DICE should ignore you and actually fix the more important issues like netcode or crashes/stability instead of fixing weapons to suit one particular person.
QFTJoshP wrote:
Why do so many people say "DICE fix this it's gay", or "EA fix this people spam it too much"
If you care so passionately about your certain fix and think it will improve the gameplay, go make a mod which changes it. If it's awsm everyone will play it, and maybe DICE ought to actually listen to your suggestions. But the more likely outcome is that you're just another person bitching about bits of the game, and DICE should ignore you and actually fix the more important issues like netcode or crashes/stability instead of fixing weapons to suit one particular person.
Alright everyone claiming there will no patch 1.5; prove it. Otherwise:Pubic wrote:
This one (1.5) isn't coming. EA/DICE just don't give a fuck.
Last edited by Ioan92 (2009-02-10 09:12:16)
There are only a few tweaks I'd like to see:
- Allthough I really love my claymores, they should be passable just like in BF 2142.
- AT rockets should only explode when they hit solid material, they should pass soldiers.
- Reduce reviving to 1 point.
- Med and mun packs shouldn't be deployable, hold them in the hands to do anything.
I'm not affected by the jet stuff, but I'm really astonished about the discussion. Everytime I visit a jet map (or even worse a bomber map) against my better knowledge, I don't see any dogfights but 'ground raping' all day long without bothering enemy aircraft at all.
- Allthough I really love my claymores, they should be passable just like in BF 2142.
- AT rockets should only explode when they hit solid material, they should pass soldiers.
- Reduce reviving to 1 point.
- Med and mun packs shouldn't be deployable, hold them in the hands to do anything.
I'm not affected by the jet stuff, but I'm really astonished about the discussion. Everytime I visit a jet map (or even worse a bomber map) against my better knowledge, I don't see any dogfights but 'ground raping' all day long without bothering enemy aircraft at all.
guize post tweaks and DICE (should) just ignore you, as you're all talking rubbish
it's just your opinion on a game
tl;dr stfu
it's just your opinion on a game
tl;dr stfu
So we're not allowed to wonder what kinds of things that could be implemented?
Oh, okay, we'll just fuck off and leave this thread entirely then.
Oh, okay, we'll just fuck off and leave this thread entirely then.
My top fixes:
Remove claymores from the game.
Make flares more reliable.
Balance the jets.
Return the Black Hawk to its former glory.
Make the M16 do enough damage for a OHK headshot.
Remove claymores from the game.
Make flares more reliable.
Balance the jets.
Return the Black Hawk to its former glory.
Make the M16 do enough damage for a OHK headshot.
Pages: 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 21
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- BF2 1.50 patch news