andy12 wrote:
m3thod wrote:
andy12 wrote:
Torture probably has been used, there are Privates fresh outta Basic that are based there. I think we all know, but we get the best. We get the massive advantage of gaining intel via torture, and we get to deny it and pretend we're morally impeccable. Sweet deal.
Intel gained from torture is unreliable.
Sometimes, but unless you're an expert you don't know the ratio of unreliable intel:reliable intel.
You know i could type that reponse to anyone and everyone on this forum. "Unless you're a expert you don't know shit".
So here is some food for thought and maybe some experts:
Another objection is that torture doesn't work. All the literature and experts say that if we really want usable information, we should go exactly the opposite way and try to gain the trust and confidence of the prisoners. Torture will get you information, but it's not reliable. Eventually, if you don't accidentally kill them first, torture victims will tell you something just to make you stop - Rear Admiral (ret.) John Hutson, former Judge Advocate General for the Navy
And torture -- I just don't think it really works. I think it works for the Egyptians, the Syrians, the Saudis, who want to scare the hell out of people. But you don't get the truth. What happens when you torture people is, they figure out what you want to hear and they tell you - Bob Baer, former CIA official
I personally think that any information gotten through extreme methods of torture would probably be pretty useless because it would be someone telling you what you wanted to hear - Michael Scheuer, formerly a senior CIA official in the Counter-Terrorism Center
It?s human nature. People don?t cooperate with you unless they have some reason to." He added, "Brutalization doesn?t work. We know that. Besides, you lose your soul - Dan Coleman, retired FBI agent
And the piece de resistance: Army Field Manual 34-52 Chapter 1:
The use of force, mental torture, threats, insults, or exposure to unpleasant and inhumane treatment of any kind is prohibited by law and is neither authorized nor condoned by the US Government. Experience indicates that the use of force is not necessary to gain the cooperation of sources for interrogation. Therefore, the use of force is a poor technique, as it yields unreliable results, may damage subsequent collection efforts, and can induce the source to say whatever he thinks the interrogator wants to hear
Knock yourself out:
http://www.amnestyusa.org/war-on-terror … id=1031036
Blackbelts are just whitebelts who have never quit.