You gotta be kidding me.
Who here owns them?New York Law Journal wrote:
Panel Rejects Lawyer's Bid To Upset Nunchakus Ban
A federal appeals panel yesterday rejected a petition to overturn a New York law banning the possession of nunchakus - the martial arts weapon popularized by Bruce Lee, consisting of two rods joined by a rope or chain. The petition was filed by home-based solo attorney James Maloney, whose nunchakus were confiscated and destroyed by police. In August 2000, a phone repairman accused Mr. Maloney, of Port Jefferson, of pointing a rifle or shotgun at him. Following a 12-hour standoff, Mr. Maloney was arrested. The police seized two unregistered guns and two nunchakus, which they later destroyed. (NYLJ, Jan. 30, 2007) Mr. Maloney pleaded guilty to disorderly conduct, and initiated the present suit, claiming the state law barring nunchakus violated the Second and Fourteenth amendments. In January 2007, Eastern District Judge Arthur D. Spatt granted the state's motion to dismiss. Yesterday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. "It is settled law . . . that the Second Amendment applies only to limitations the federal government seeks to impose," the panel held in its per curiam opinion. It added, "[i] in light of the legislature's view of the danger posed by nunchakus, we find that the prohibition against the possession of nunchakus created by N.Y. Penal Law §265.01(1) is supported by a rational basis." Maloney v. Cuomo, 07-0581-cv.