niek voting for speedylegshot made me laugh
Topic closed
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Best Overall Player
everybody knows I am the best overall player!
(lol, sarcasm )
I still admire my first clanlead(ster) F/16/NL, for her epic skills
(lol, sarcasm )
I still admire my first clanlead(ster) F/16/NL, for her epic skills
why?iMPaCT.uK wrote:
niek voting for speedylegshot made me laugh
also Spy is very good
because uv never played against spdyhs in anything other than inf, same for spy... so u dont know if there good or notMoist.Niek wrote:
why?iMPaCT.uK wrote:
niek voting for speedylegshot made me laugh
also Spy is very good
i would say YOURRZZZZZZZZ AGAIN
Last edited by ZeqTr (2009-01-23 09:33:41)
Speedy was good at conquest. *thinking of the Dragon valley match...*HaawwK wrote:
because uv never played against spdyhs in anything other than inf, same for spy... so u dont know if there good or notMoist.Niek wrote:
why?iMPaCT.uK wrote:
niek voting for speedylegshot made me laugh
also Spy is very good
but he played inf for there conquest team and driving a buggy isnt really being good in a chopper/jet is it.Sup wrote:
Speedy was good at conquest. *thinking of the Dragon valley match...*HaawwK wrote:
because uv never played against spdyhs in anything other than inf, same for spy... so u dont know if there good or notMoist.Niek wrote:
why?
also Spy is very good
He was one of rare players who actually used his brain while playing this gameHaawwK wrote:
but he played inf for there conquest team and driving a buggy isnt really being good in a chopper/jet is it.Sup wrote:
Speedy was good at conquest. *thinking of the Dragon valley match...*HaawwK wrote:
because uv never played against spdyhs in anything other than inf, same for spy... so u dont know if there good or not
Last edited by .Sup (2009-01-23 10:18:07)
Careful, a bit of full-on fail on that listOisín | Irishpride wrote:
Me thinks...
Last edited by PrivateVendetta (2009-01-23 11:27:08)
hahah
keep up this thread!
love those lists of inactive players xD
keep up this thread!
love those lists of inactive players xD
They were active when you were inactive and the golden days of this game are long over so I wouldn't consider anyone who play this game now being better than anyone from code7 days.JAyThaRevo wrote:
hahah
keep up this thread!
love those lists of inactive players xD
What an incredibly ignorant and narrow minded thing to say..Sup wrote:
They were active when you were inactive and the golden days of this game are long over so I wouldn't consider anyone who play this game now being better than anyone from code7 days.JAyThaRevo wrote:
hahah
keep up this thread!
love those lists of inactive players xD
#rekt
heh says a guy who never played any top teamsMint Sauce wrote:
What an incredibly ignorant and narrow minded thing to say..Sup wrote:
They were active when you were inactive and the golden days of this game are long over so I wouldn't consider anyone who play this game now being better than anyone from code7 days.JAyThaRevo wrote:
hahah
keep up this thread!
love those lists of inactive players xD
My kawk is huge.
Last edited by SouthernCross (2009-01-23 16:52:41)
such a geek....Sup wrote:
heh says a guy who never played any top teamsMint Sauce wrote:
What an incredibly ignorant and narrow minded thing to say..Sup wrote:
They were active when you were inactive and the golden days of this game are long over so I wouldn't consider anyone who play this game now being better than anyone from code7 days.
and to what you said about not being better than code7, code7 and all the others from back then only played for a 1 year, all the top teams now have played for 3 years, so tell me why teams now wouldnt beat teams from then? i know that when we had our coolermaster lineup we rolled all the "oldschool" teams without even a challenge
you count as ''oldschool'' tbhHaawwK wrote:
such a geek....Sup wrote:
heh says a guy who never played any top teamsMint Sauce wrote:
What an incredibly ignorant and narrow minded thing to say.
and to what you said about not being better than code7, code7 and all the others from back then only played for a 1 year, all the top teams now have played for 3 years, so tell me why teams now wouldnt beat teams from then? i know that when we had our coolermaster lineup we rolled all the "oldschool" teams without even a challenge
Never played or never played in?.Sup wrote:
heh says a guy who never played any top teamsMint Sauce wrote:
What an incredibly ignorant and narrow minded thing to say..Sup wrote:
They were active when you were inactive and the golden days of this game are long over so I wouldn't consider anyone who play this game now being better than anyone from code7 days.
#rekt
Yeah 1 year vs 3. They reached top level in a year. Tell me how many years did you need or still need? And beating Dignitas who were inactive for a year doesn't mean anything. Beating them 1.5 years too late.HaawwK wrote:
such a geek....Sup wrote:
heh says a guy who never played any top teamsMint Sauce wrote:
What an incredibly ignorant and narrow minded thing to say.
and to what you said about not being better than code7, code7 and all the others from back then only played for a 1 year, all the top teams now have played for 3 years, so tell me why teams now wouldnt beat teams from then? i know that when we had our coolermaster lineup we rolled all the "oldschool" teams without even a challenge
The best players united about 6 months - 1 year ago would trash the best players united 2-3 years ago..Sup wrote:
Yeah 1 year vs 3. They reached top level in a year. Tell me how many years did you need or still need? And beating Dignitas who were inactive for a year doesn't mean anything. Beating them 1.5 years too late.HaawwK wrote:
such a geek....Sup wrote:
heh says a guy who never played any top teams
and to what you said about not being better than code7, code7 and all the others from back then only played for a 1 year, all the top teams now have played for 3 years, so tell me why teams now wouldnt beat teams from then? i know that when we had our coolermaster lineup we rolled all the "oldschool" teams without even a challenge
4v4, 5v5, 8v8, 12v12, 16v16.
im sure if we had that same lineup 1.5 years ago we would of still beaten them....Sup wrote:
Yeah 1 year vs 3. They reached top level in a year. Tell me how many years did you need or still need? And beating Dignitas who were inactive for a year doesn't mean anything. Beating them 1.5 years too late.HaawwK wrote:
such a geek....Sup wrote:
heh says a guy who never played any top teams
and to what you said about not being better than code7, code7 and all the others from back then only played for a 1 year, all the top teams now have played for 3 years, so tell me why teams now wouldnt beat teams from then? i know that when we had our coolermaster lineup we rolled all the "oldschool" teams without even a challenge
"Tell me how many years did you need or still need?"
the day we got our best lineup we were pretty much winning everything and that was like 2 years ago i think
it's getting bigger!
What makes u think that?HaawwK wrote:
because uv never played against spdyhs in anything other than inf, same for spy... so u dont know if there good or notMoist.Niek wrote:
why?iMPaCT.uK wrote:
niek voting for speedylegshot made me laugh
also Spy is very good
cause ur shit?Moist.Niek wrote:
What makes u think that?HaawwK wrote:
because uv never played against spdyhs in anything other than inf, same for spy... so u dont know if there good or notMoist.Niek wrote:
why?
also Spy is very good
You're all taking this game too seriously. Whats the point?
Topic closed
- Index »
- Games »
- Battlefield Series »
- Battlefield 2 »
- Best Overall Player