did you not read what i wrote? its right above you.SEREVENT wrote:
What was his excuse for his name?
No i only read the first pageusmarine wrote:
did you not read what i wrote? its right above you.SEREVENT wrote:
What was his excuse for his name?
the explanation is there also.SEREVENT wrote:
No i only read the first pageusmarine wrote:
did you not read what i wrote? its right above you.SEREVENT wrote:
What was his excuse for his name?
It means you only have one moderator action taken against you for every hundreds or thousands of posts you make. It's a good thing.lowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhh whats a warn: post ratio? and is being low good or bad?
It doesn't matter if it is the same person. Each account is judged individually, not as a person.usmarine wrote:
oh and FM, he came in this forum as a nazi, so therefore it is not a personal attack. he made it clear he is proud of that.usmarine wrote:
point is, he came into this forum with that nazi name and what was the first thing he did? make a thread about the jews and israel. thats why you guys banned him yes? right, so whats the problem?
oh and since he has been back, the majority of his time in this section is in israel threads. go figure.
and his excuse for his name was an australian chainsaw company, which btw you guys didnt buy hence the reason he was banned.
then you let him come back with that name not even spelled correctly.
-------------------------
im no lawyer but i bet i could win this case in court
I have not seem himself call him a Nazi on the new account. If he did, I think he would be gone lol.
Thank you.usmarine wrote:
the explanation is there also.SEREVENT wrote:
No i only read the first pageusmarine wrote:
did you not read what i wrote? its right above you.
Warning(ie: being told off by the mods) : post (those things we write on here) ratio. You know what a ratio is right? Like 1:10, so you get one warning per 10 posts. A low warning:post ratio would mean you post a lot but very rarely get warned.lowing wrote:
Uhhhhhhh whats a warn: post ratio? and is being low good or bad?Flaming_Maniac wrote:
qftTurquoise wrote:
While the freedom of speech doesn't apply to a private forum, it is a nice principle to stand by.
Debates do tend to be more interesting when all views are allowed -- no matter how despicable and ignorant they might be.I assume you're not talking about moderation anymore, because you have a very low warn:post ratio.lowing wrote:
I am a little dismayed at the fact that I am labeled fulla hate and should be banned for hating Islam, while everyone else gets away with hating Israel and nothing is said.
I hate Islam, never said anything about hating Muslims, and I am labeled
You clamin to hate Israel and not Jews, and this gets a pass.
Are you sure you guys are not active in the UN?
bullshit.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
It doesn't matter if it is the same person. Each account is judged individually, not as a person.
so no matter what you post you can just rejoin with a different name and all is cool? get real
Last edited by usmarine (2009-01-11 11:41:34)
Actually, it could be bad anyway. It is possible to post more than a meager population of admins can keep up with.ghettoperson wrote:
Warning(ie: being told off by the mods) : post (those things we write on here) ratio. You know what a ratio is right? Like 1:10, so you get one warning per 10 posts. A low warning:post ratio would mean you post a lot but very rarely get warned.
Well that would be the ideal. There are exceptions to that rule, but at least in my opinion they are very few and far between.usmarine wrote:
bullshit.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
It doesn't matter if it is the same person. Each account is judged individually, not as a person.
so no matter what you post you can just rejoin with a different name and all is cool? get real
So long as a post contributes to the forum, all else is irrelevant. There is no reason to keep someone off of the forums only because of their name.
A forums activity will live and die by it's moderation. This forum is very successful. You guys should be praising us, bowing down in worship, and possibly sending each mod tokens of gratitude.
lul
lul
Xbone Stormsurgezz
it wasnt just his name. oh fuck it. you all fucked up by letting him back in anyway. that was fucking bullshit and most of us here know it. for some reason you guys cant see it.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well that would be the ideal. There are exceptions to that rule, but at least in my opinion they are very few and far between.usmarine wrote:
bullshit.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
It doesn't matter if it is the same person. Each account is judged individually, not as a person.
so no matter what you post you can just rejoin with a different name and all is cool? get real
So long as a post contributes to the forum, all else is irrelevant. There is no reason to keep someone off of the forums only because of their name.
From the guy who has had like four accounts..lolusmarine wrote:
it wasnt just his name. oh fuck it. you all fucked up by letting him back in anyway. that was fucking bullshit and most of us here know it. for some reason you guys cant see it.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well that would be the ideal. There are exceptions to that rule, but at least in my opinion they are very few and far between.usmarine wrote:
bullshit.
so no matter what you post you can just rejoin with a different name and all is cool? get real
So long as a post contributes to the forum, all else is irrelevant. There is no reason to keep someone off of the forums only because of their name.
Xbone Stormsurgezz
Not literally his name, him as a person. I don't care who is posting it, I care about what is being posted.usmarine wrote:
it wasnt just his name. oh fuck it. you all fucked up by letting him back in anyway. that was fucking bullshit and most of us here know it. for some reason you guys cant see it.Flaming_Maniac wrote:
Well that would be the ideal. There are exceptions to that rule, but at least in my opinion they are very few and far between.usmarine wrote:
bullshit.
so no matter what you post you can just rejoin with a different name and all is cool? get real
So long as a post contributes to the forum, all else is irrelevant. There is no reason to keep someone off of the forums only because of their name.
There are a lot of people who have this policy to thank for their continued membership, many that are very popular.
so what? read the OP again. you are equating spam with the celebration of the mass killing of people. fuck sakes. forget it.Kmarion wrote:
From the guy who has had like four accounts..lol
It's about breaking rules, you know like personal attacks?usmarine wrote:
so what? read the OP again. you are equating spam with the celebration of the mass killing of people. fuck sakes. forget it.Kmarion wrote:
From the guy who has had like four accounts..lol
Xbone Stormsurgezz
So far as the forums are concerned they are. They are both bad enough to merit a perm ban, and there isn't any form of judgment past that benchmark.usmarine wrote:
so what? read the OP again. you are equating spam with the celebration of the mass killing of people. fuck sakes. forget it.Kmarion wrote:
From the guy who has had like four accounts..lol
I am with you jord. i am at a complete loss why some of the people here and mods defend him. it amazing.
request new forum name pls.....
KK_isoK
thank you. shouldnt be a problem.
request new forum name pls.....
KK_isoK
thank you. shouldnt be a problem.
have you ever moderated forums, marine? if people use anonymizer software it is impossible to actually tell who is who - nick is the only thing you have to go by. so, yes, he could rejoin with different name.usmarine wrote:
so no matter what you post you can just rejoin with a different name and all is cool?
if you open your mind too much your brain will fall out.
right. you mean the the ones between bern and cougar where cougar gets banned? ya i know about those.Kmarion wrote:
It's about breaking rules, you know like personal attacks?
That's me! i do that. What does it make you wonder about ?Poseidon wrote:
I just find it funny how we have 2 or 3 people who suddenly appear when it's time to bash Israel, but are non-existant when things are relatively calm in the ME.
Makes you wonder..
We are defending objectivity. I don't think I've ever been on his side of a debate. But I respect his right to voice his opinion if it is within the rules.usmarine wrote:
I am with you jord. i am at a complete loss why some of the people here and mods defend him. it amazing.
request new forum name pls.....
KK_isoK
thank you. shouldnt be a problem.
I'm not familiar with the Bern/Cougar incident. However, looking over your mod history here you'll have to excuse me if I'm a little reluctant in accepting your idea of a fair ban. How about we change your name to vendetta?usmarine wrote:
right. you mean the the ones between bern and cougar where cougar gets banned? ya i know about those.Kmarion wrote:
It's about breaking rules, you know like personal attacks?
Xbone Stormsurgezz
K, whats my mod history looking like ?I'm not familiar with the Bern/Cougar incident. However, looking over your mod history here you'll have to excuse me if I'm a little reluctant in accepting your idea of a fair ban. How about we change your name to vendetta?
Mods are doing a good job here at BF2s. Haters fuck off
Remove your lips from those soft cheeks, for you will never be a mod regardless..Sup wrote:
Mods are doing a good job here at BF2s. Haters fuck off
haha I don't want to be a mod Jord. What made you think that? In your RL if you commend someone is it so you can suck up to them? Shame if its sojord wrote:
Remove your lips from those soft cheeks, for you will never be a mod regardless..Sup wrote:
Mods are doing a good job here at BF2s. Haters fuck off