Survivorman basically teaches you how to survive in the wild without any equipment.
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
Poll
Which do you like the most ? Survivorman or Man vs. Wild
| Survivorman | 56% | 56% - 41 | ||||
| Man vs. Wild | 43% | 43% - 31 | ||||
| Total: 72 | ||||||
Yah that's why I like it so much. The season finale episode last night was ok but not to spoil anything he met up with a tribe on day 5 and was givin food to eat and he survived on that till day 4 on day 5 or 6 two members of a tribe asked him to join him up so really his last episode was the easiest for him when all reality it should have been the hardest. Anyone else agree ?War Man wrote:
Survivorman basically teaches you how to survive in the wild without any equipment.
That's what you're supposed to do in the wildObiwan wrote:
Yah that's why I like it so much. The season finale episode last night was ok but not to spoil anything he met up with a tribe on day 5 and was givin food to eat and he survived on that till day 4 on day 5 or 6 two members of a tribe asked him to join him up so really his last episode was the easiest for him when all reality it should have been the hardest. Anyone else agree ?War Man wrote:
Survivorman basically teaches you how to survive in the wild without any equipment.
Edit: I'm stating the obvious of course
Last edited by War Man (2008-12-21 03:54:03)
The irony of guns, is that they can save lives.
You're just jealous.Kmarion wrote:
Yea, I'll go with the Canadian.. Bear is obnoxious.-MetaL* wrote:
Survivorman is real.
Pretty sure that's what both shows do...War Man wrote:
Survivorman basically teaches you how to survive in the wild without any equipment.
- Superior Mind
- (not macbeth)
- +1,755|6684
Bear Grylls just shows different techniques. He isn't actually alone in a survival situation. Les is.phishman420 wrote:
Pretty sure that's what both shows do...War Man wrote:
Survivorman basically teaches you how to survive in the wild without any equipment.
So? He is still showing you how to live off the land. Only an idiot (Les) would actually put himself in to those situations alone.Superior Mind wrote:
Bear Grylls just shows different techniques. He isn't actually alone in a survival situation. Les is.phishman420 wrote:
Pretty sure that's what both shows do...War Man wrote:
Survivorman basically teaches you how to survive in the wild without any equipment.
Grylls.
Fuck you America.
Fuck you America.
It's only idiotic if you fail at it. He, however, epic wins at it, so it's awsm.phishman420 wrote:
So? He is still showing you how to live off the land. Only an idiot (Les) would actually put himself in to those situations alone.Superior Mind wrote:
Bear Grylls just shows different techniques. He isn't actually alone in a survival situation. Les is.phishman420 wrote:
Pretty sure that's what both shows do...
@Sheriff you're just jealous cause your pretty-boy alleged ex-SAS guy can't even live on his own in the wild
I bet he was the guy always intentionally breaking his leg during SAS training so the others would have to carry him back to base
Don't get me wrong; I have mad respect for Les. I just don't think what he does is worth it. At least Bear is smart enough to have a crew with him in case something were to go wrong, even though a crew wouldn't be able to help him when he was FLYING OVER MOUNT EVEREST ON A FUCKING PARAGLIDER. BTW, Les is Canadian, so keep the patriotism out.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
It's only idiotic if you fail at it. He, however, epic wins at it, so it's awsm.phishman420 wrote:
So? He is still showing you how to live off the land. Only an idiot (Les) would actually put himself in to those situations alone.Superior Mind wrote:
Bear Grylls just shows different techniques. He isn't actually alone in a survival situation. Les is.
@Sheriff you're just jealous cause your pretty-boy alleged ex-SAS guy can't even live on his own in the wild
I bet he was the guy always intentionally breaking his leg during SAS training so the others would have to carry him back to base
The BBC can't risk lives for the sake of ratings. The shitty Canadian company the other fag works for probably can, cause they have a budget of $50 Canadian dollars so that's like £2.60 in real money. So yeah. the BBC risks millions in potential sues for broadcasting and producing a show where a guy dies. Bear did SAS selection, and passed. Bear has an awesome name. Bear is British. And finally, Bear is a hunk. So STFU.
Name: Probably changed, who the fuck names their kid Bear? Isn't a bear a gay dude anyway?jord wrote:
The BBC can't risk lives for the sake of ratings. The shitty Canadian company the other fag works for probably can, cause they have a budget of $50 Canadian dollars so that's like £2.60 in real money. So yeah. the BBC risks millions in potential sues for broadcasting and producing a show where a guy dies. Bear did SAS selection, and passed. Bear has an awesome name. Bear is British. And finally, Bear is a hunk. So STFU.
British: Meh
Hunk: One day he'll roid rage, just wait
And he can't sue if he's dead
And that makes no sense anyway. A poor Canadian company can afford big lawsuits better than one of the biggest broadcasting corporations in the world?
Last edited by Hurricane2k9 (2008-12-21 06:57:09)
No, the BBC can't risk big lawsuits, where as the most the Canadian company has to pay out is like £2.60. L2read.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Name: Probably changed, who the fuck names their kid Bear? Isn't a bear a gay dude anyway?jord wrote:
The BBC can't risk lives for the sake of ratings. The shitty Canadian company the other fag works for probably can, cause they have a budget of $50 Canadian dollars so that's like £2.60 in real money. So yeah. the BBC risks millions in potential sues for broadcasting and producing a show where a guy dies. Bear did SAS selection, and passed. Bear has an awesome name. Bear is British. And finally, Bear is a hunk. So STFU.
British: Meh
Hunk: One day he'll roid rage, just wait
And he can't sue if he's dead
And that makes no sense anyway. A poor Canadian company can afford big lawsuits better than one of the biggest broadcasting corporations in the world?
In an ideal world yes. But sadly this world is full of fail. Because lawsuits like this actually make it to court (although thankfully they never work):jord wrote:
No, the BBC can't risk big lawsuits, where as the most the Canadian company has to pay out is like £2.60. L2read.Hurricane2k9 wrote:
Name: Probably changed, who the fuck names their kid Bear? Isn't a bear a gay dude anyway?jord wrote:
The BBC can't risk lives for the sake of ratings. The shitty Canadian company the other fag works for probably can, cause they have a budget of $50 Canadian dollars so that's like £2.60 in real money. So yeah. the BBC risks millions in potential sues for broadcasting and producing a show where a guy dies. Bear did SAS selection, and passed. Bear has an awesome name. Bear is British. And finally, Bear is a hunk. So STFU.
British: Meh
Hunk: One day he'll roid rage, just wait
And he can't sue if he's dead
And that makes no sense anyway. A poor Canadian company can afford big lawsuits better than one of the biggest broadcasting corporations in the world?
http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/12/18/pan … index.html
Sigh, why. Why...
because nothing gets you a nicer ticket to hell than suing two old korean people who run a small dry-cleaning operationjord wrote:
Sigh, why. Why...
Survivorman.
Survivorman actually teaches you how to survive. Bear Grylls just goes for the rating by shoving as many things down his throat in one episode as he can.
Last edited by MysteryJake (2008-12-21 14:47:49)