how many fps do u get and what do you think is a good amount of fps?
***edit***
i get around 60 fps. is that good or bad?
***edit***
i get around 60 fps. is that good or bad?
Last edited by RotorBlade00 (2008-12-20 17:22:40)
The more the better. I only get 40-80 though, stupid computer doesnt like BF2
100 solid, cba to unlock it.
Generally over 60 is what you want, under 30 is what you certainly do not want.
Generally over 60 is what you want, under 30 is what you certainly do not want.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
Ideally you should be getting over 250.
My state was founded by Batman. Your opinion is invalid.
Nah, that only applies to cod4Cheez wrote:
Ideally you should be getting over 250.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
www.instantrimshot.comDeathUnlimited wrote:
Nah, that only applies to cod4Cheez wrote:
Ideally you should be getting over 250.
The idea of any hi-fi system is to reproduce the source material as faithfully as possible, and to deliberately add distortion to everything you hear (due to amplifier deficiencies) because it sounds 'nice' is simply not high fidelity. If that is what you want to hear then there is no problem with that, but by adding so much additional material (by way of harmonics and intermodulation) you have a tailored sound system, not a hi-fi. - Rod Elliot, ESP
60, anything else is unnecessary.
Anything above 60 is redundant. And between 30 and 60, you can't tell much difference.
Below 30 it's getting a little choppy.
Below 20 it's a slideshow.
Below 30 it's getting a little choppy.
Below 20 it's a slideshow.
wot he said ^N00bkilla55404 wrote:
60, anything else is unnecessary.
fps_max 101
175 - 250
1000-2376 i win
Lock your fps to 30 and to 60. You will notice the difference easily. I used locked 36fps for a long time and difference to what I now get is easily noticeable.DoctaStrangelove wrote:
Anything above 60 is redundant. And between 30 and 60, you can't tell much difference.
Below 30 it's getting a little choppy.
Below 20 it's a slideshow.
main battle tank karthus medikopter 117 megamegapowershot gg
i get 30 fps lolz, nvidia 6100 onboard kthx
Is there a benefit to locking your fps?
no.
btw 400-500
btw 400-500
lock it at your refresh rate and it might save spare resources for say, folding? not really sure.Sup wrote:
Is there a benefit to locking your fps?
but obviously if it's over the refresh rate of your monitor then it's pointless, as you will never see the 250fps generated in COD4, because your monitor won't display it
What's the console command for displaying fps?
/hangs head in shame.
/hangs head in shame.
renderer.showfps 1Slarty wrote:
What's the console command for displaying fps?
/hangs head in shame.
game.lockfps x
Where x is any value, if x is 0, it will unlock your fps.
those 500+ fps are some infantry whores playing on uberlow settings, the game and their videos is ugly
i play all high, just no shadows and dynamic lightning and i get 150-250fps, recording at 60fps fullsize
AND there IS visible difference between 60 and 100 and e.g.200... if u dont see it, u have either bad screen or bad eyes/brain
i play all high, just no shadows and dynamic lightning and i get 150-250fps, recording at 60fps fullsize
AND there IS visible difference between 60 and 100 and e.g.200... if u dont see it, u have either bad screen or bad eyes/brain
Your monitor shows 60 pictures a second. At most 80. 60 to 100, probably. 200 is unsubstantiated, in terms of hardware.pauli *wsaf wrote:
those 500+ fps are some infantry whores playing on uberlow settings, the game and their videos is ugly
i play all high, just no shadows and dynamic lightning and i get 150-250fps, recording at 60fps fullsize
AND there IS visible difference between 60 and 100 and e.g.200... if u dont see it, u have either bad screen or bad eyes/brain
Do these people who don't notice the difference belong to the group that don't respond very well to the placebo effect?
This. The average monitor displays at 60Hz, which means your monitor refreshes the picture 60 times in a second, which means that of your 250fps in COD4, you only get to see 60 of these frames.some_random_panda wrote:
Your monitor shows 60 pictures a second. At most 80. 60 to 100, probably. 200 is unsubstantiated, in terms of hardware.pauli *wsaf wrote:
those 500+ fps are some infantry whores playing on uberlow settings, the game and their videos is ugly
i play all high, just no shadows and dynamic lightning and i get 150-250fps, recording at 60fps fullsize
AND there IS visible difference between 60 and 100 and e.g.200... if u dont see it, u have either bad screen or bad eyes/brain
Do these people who don't notice the difference belong to the group that don't respond very well to the placebo effect?
Do this to show the refresh rate that your monitor is set to; any FPS values larger than the refresh rate are pointless. If you can "see" a difference between 100 and 60 fps when your monitor is at 60Hz, you're a victim of teh placebo effect, as previously stated.
l2physics nubs
also highsettings fags, the game is fail on IO played with all high settings. Textures + geometries + texture filtering high, view distance 100% or gtfo tbh
Last edited by JoshP (2008-12-21 04:45:40)
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/1 … AA200_.jpg - Iiyama Vision Master Pro 454
19" CRT 150Hz @ 800x600
GTFO TFT nabs
19" CRT 150Hz @ 800x600
GTFO TFT nabs
Last edited by iMPaCT.uK (2008-12-21 04:51:07)
800 x 600iMPaCT.uK wrote:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/11Q84HYF16L._SL500_AA200_.jpg - Iiyama Vision Master Pro 454
19" CRT 150Hz @ 800x600
GTFO TFT nabs
wat
GTFO small resolution/4:3 fags
think highest res monitor goes to is 1920 x 1440 @ 85 Hz
so ye.
CRT > TFT and they only cost 30 quid of ebay. I think people forget that TFT's are actually a stepback from them huge CRT's with refreshrates etc and that CRT's are the best monitors for gaming. highest H a TFT can reach is 85hz yet CRT's can get 120-150Hz depending on the model @ lower resolutions like 800x600 or 1024x768
so ye.
CRT > TFT and they only cost 30 quid of ebay. I think people forget that TFT's are actually a stepback from them huge CRT's with refreshrates etc and that CRT's are the best monitors for gaming. highest H a TFT can reach is 85hz yet CRT's can get 120-150Hz depending on the model @ lower resolutions like 800x600 or 1024x768
Last edited by iMPaCT.uK (2008-12-21 05:02:11)