BF2S Forums BF2 1.50 patch news

Fat_Swinub wrote:

No seriously read it, it's got to be the worse post in this entire thread and some people have really come out with some shitty opinions.

oh i did read it

lol @ m95 sounds

TopHat01 wrote:

LOL @ .Sup's picture and "Jizzed in my Pants".  The interviewer is retarded; "OMG BF2 has live fish!".  Obviously he doesn't even play, sometimes they pick the worst people to interview...

This is looks sweet, I do hope they tweak that map a bit.  AK-47 medic (whore) rape will be

...And of course there will always be those players who will pick the G36E over an AK.

MEC vs China would be win-the fight of the AKs

does no one else think the m95 sounds better in normal bf2 than aix then? - no need to take the piss just saying what i think

Last edited by H3RB4L ABU53 (2008-12-17 17:47:46)

H3RB4L ABU53 wrote:

f35 can hover

more worthless than a hot chick passing out condoms at a wow lan party

Smaller hit box for F-35b =           \/\/     |     |\|

IF EA were to really put some fixes in, and announce that they will dedicate another year or two to more boosters/expansions,  They could easily breathe more life back into BF2 and squeeze some real dollars out of the BF2 franchise.  Win win.

CS is still alive and well..... BF2 had a similiar following, but alot of spoofing/hacking/shit patches turned off alot of people.

It's not too late EA....

unless you (EA) decide to put DRM into these hypothetical new booster packs.


I can dream can't I?

Sounds like steelie34 knows lol. Jokes bro lol

The map looks good and is significantly better than anything like tampa, though I hope they reconsider the lighting setup. I know that maps like Songhua with bleak lighting have a lot of atmosphere, but they're depressing to play. I always prefer maps with a brighter outlook (even Karkand's orange is nice and warm) and better visibility.

Regarding their J-10 tweaks: I'm not really convinced. The problem with the F-35B is simple: For the average pilot in the F-35B, making one little mistake is as good as being dead. How is reigning in the J-10's manoeuvrability going to help in this respect? You only need a few seconds to kill most F-35B pilots when flying the J-10 -- manoeuvrability doesn't come into it a lot of the time. Lock, fire, dead F-35B.  Reducing the manoeuvrability of the J-10 will help the experienced F-35B pilots escape lock after the first round of flares and then start to dogfight, but I doubt it will change the balance on the average pub server considering that they're not changing the F-35B hitbox & most people don't know how to flare in the F-35B.

For people like Oakleaves & co. who can flare effectively in the F-35B, it'll definitely be a good change.  However, the average F-35B pilot doesn't know this stuff and never will.

Last edited by Arnie_Ze_Austrian (2008-12-18 01:07:09)

I'll be happy if they support 16:10 widescreen (1440x900, 1680x1050, etc)

Cheez wrote:

some_random_panda wrote:

I'll be happy if they support 16:10 widescreen (1440x900, 1680x1050, etc)

It will, like 2142. Really all it does is let you choose it, it'll still look crappy.

Ah well, at least I won't have to use a +szy +szx shortcut instead.

JoshP wrote:

medwhoring on an urban map > assault + specops

Assault > medic, because you can easily kill medic and heal yourself from his kit. Body armor > medpacks.

steelie34 wrote:

Longbow wrote:

JoshP wrote:

medwhoring on an urban map > assault + specops

Assault > medic, because you can easily kill medic and heal yourself from his kit. Body armor > medpacks.

yeah but as a medic you can just drop two med packs and sit on them.  basically giving yourself three times the health when you're fighting.

this

Mint Sauce wrote:

Longbow wrote:

JoshP wrote:

medwhoring on an urban map > assault + specops

Assault > medic, because you can easily kill medic and heal yourself from his kit. Body armor > medpacks.

A good medic will rape any Assault player every time, I guarantee.

body armour doesnt save u from my 1 shot REGGA style, bitch.