lowing wrote:
Little BaBy JESUS wrote:
lowing wrote:
"but i have a feeling that insurgents wouldnt be blowing themselves up, using IEDs, sniping people if America wasnt there... or do u think the muslims are so crazy they'd blow up people in Iraq for laughs?" <------ yer kiddin' right? Might wanna check yer history books.
It is no line, intel DID place WMD's in Iraq and that was the intel that was approved by the US ( both parties) and the UN.
It is your very attitude that underestimates their intentions which lead to yet another major terror attack, on India.
Ok refresh my history for me since u seem to be the base of all knowledge and reason.
Oh? my attitude caused the attacks in india.... i see... and here i was thinking that the US creating matyrs and killing civillians and invading countries might have more to do with it. i guess my attitude caused the finacial crisis to? mabye global warming?
nope, do your own legwork, I will give you a hint, look up the reason Saddam was tried and executed, alos try looking up his 2 sons and read articles about them.
Look, I already asked you to show me where the US purposely targets civilians for bombings murder, rape, etc..... you failed t odo this, in fact you back pedaled on it. The US did not invade Iraq, the US went to war with Iraq. Along those same lines I guess the US invaded Germany and Japan.
You use the word invade on purpose to try and project a sense of unwarranted or unprovoked action, this is bullshit and you know it.
Lowing, i NEVER SAID THAT THE US DELIBERATELY TARGETS CIVILIANS. if u can show me where i said that ill be happy to respond. i said that the US killing of civilians etc fuels terrorism. i didnt say that soldiers are deliberately killing civillians. also i dont know where u got this "rape" thing from i never even mentioned the word. "the US went to war with Iraq" is just a nicer way of saying "the US invaded iraq". it means the same thing.
also, "You use the word invade on purpose to try and project a sense of unwarranted or unprovoked action, this is bullshit and you know it."
Lol, and i still feel that the war was neither warranted or provoked, im not trying to make it look like that, it is like that.
explain this, Osama bin laden and al qaeda killed 3000 americans. so Afganistan is invaded, fair enough we all say, america has the right to capture or kill the terrorists that did this. So why were so many more troops used in the "war on iraq" than afganistan. terror cells that were hiding in afganistan had attacked america... and yet the country where none of the attackers were hiding, based, or came from was attack with a much larger force.
and dont try to justify the "war on iraq" by the things saddam had done. sure he was a terrible person who did terrible things, yet tens of thousands more people have been killed during the iraq war than saddams entire regime. Interesting... that does sound like freedom and democracy prevailing? So why hasnt america stopped all the other brutal dictators, people that have killed hundreds of thousands of people?