BF2S Forums why/not?

Where is the "WHAT THE FUCK?!" option?

Just because is the better answer for a couple of reasons.  First, the Socratic method of explaining some is a crock of shit, purely used by psuedo intellectuals to make themselves feel superior to the masses.  Thus answering with "Why not?" is an elitist bull shit way of answering.  Second, in answering "Just because" at least then you are owning up to at least having given the reasoning of the question some thought, you have owned the question and answer.

Why not? 

Yah, what he said.

Burning_Monkey wrote:

Just because is the better answer for a couple of reasons.  First, the Socratic method of explaining some is a crock of shit, purely used by psuedo intellectuals to make themselves feel superior to the masses.  Thus answering with "Why not?" is an elitist bull shit way of answering.

What? Why? Just like the nature of 'Just Because', you give the illusion of providing an answer, without actually providing one. If any of what you say is true, prove it. What's more, if you try to, then whatever you say will inevitably end up in a socractic dialogue with your interlocutor. And why not? Socractic dialogues are informative and entertaining.

Burning_Monkey wrote:

Second, in answering "Just because" at least then you are owning up to at least having given the reasoning of the question some thought

bullshit, no you haven't - you're doing the exact opposite: refusing to give a reason, showing that you have in fact not given it any thought at all.

Burning_Monkey wrote:

you have owned the question and answer.

nope. owned by the question, for the lack of an answer, and the "why not?" ability to admit it and engage in a dialogue to find one with someone else.

I chose "Why not?" over "Just Because" just for this reason :

"Why did you had sex with my girlfriend!?"

"....Why not?"

Yes that had no meaning or moral, but neither has this post!

Wtf

" enemy Wheel-Barrow spotted!"

kanninahbehchaocheebai

ask mikeshw or bearz for a translation..

Just no.