Muslim Clerics guilty of Appeasement

2008-11-10 13:24:14

#1

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,984|6937|949

Maulana Qari Mohammad Usman Mansoorpuri, president of the Jamaiat-Ulama-i-Hind, called terrorism the most serious problem facing Islam, The Hindu reported. He blamed Islamic radicals for their actions and the news media for failing to distinguish between the radicals and the majority of Muslim

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-10 13:24:27)

2008-11-10 13:26:10

#2

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6956|USA

I am sorry, according you guys Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. so what does this guy know?

2008-11-10 13:26:41

#3

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,984|6937|949

More than you, for a start.

Did your appeasement meter go off? That was my intention.

Last edited by KEN-JENNINGS (2008-11-10 13:27:22)

2008-11-10 13:31:35

#4

lowing: Banned; +1,662|6956|USA

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
More than you, for a start.

Did your appeasement meter go off? That was my intention.

Nope not really, this guy acknowledging the obvious is more of a surprise than anything else. If he is coming out and saying what has already been established by the rest of the world ( except for you) he must know a hell of a lot more than any of us about their intentions.

2008-11-10 13:33:43

#5

AussieReaper: ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°); +5,761|6457|what

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Appeasing the western numpties?

Maulana Qari Mohammad Usman Mansoorpuri, president of the Jamaiat-Ulama-i-Hind, called terrorism the most serious problem facing Islam, The Hindu reported.

He's Hindi. Not Muslim?

edit: Turns out both, apparently. lol

Last edited by TheAussieReaper (2008-11-10 13:35:02)

2008-11-10 13:35:16

#6

Switch: Knee Deep In Clunge; +489|6768|Tyne & Wear, England

TheAussieReaper wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Appeasing the western numpties?

Maulana Qari Mohammad Usman Mansoorpuri, president of the Jamaiat-Ulama-i-Hind, called terrorism the most serious problem facing Islam, The Hindu reported.
He's Hindi. Not Muslim?

That's the name of the news source I believe.

Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known.

2008-11-10 13:36:22

#7

Mekstizzle: WALKER; +3,611|6926|London, England

TheAussieReaper wrote:
KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Appeasing the western numpties?

Maulana Qari Mohammad Usman Mansoorpuri, president of the Jamaiat-Ulama-i-Hind, called terrorism the most serious problem facing Islam, The Hindu reported.
He's Hindi. Not Muslim?

edit: Turns out both, apparently. lol

No "The Hindu" it's a website/news paper if I remember it correctly.

http://www.hinduonnet.com/

I guess KILLSWITCH beat me to it

Last edited by Mekstizzle (2008-11-10 13:36:39)

2008-11-10 13:38:11

#8

Beduin: Compensation of Reactive Power in the grid; +510|6055|شمال

lowing wrote:
I am sorry, according you guys Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. so what does this guy know?

HYDERABAD, India, Nov. 8 (UPI) -- About 6,000 Muslim clerics from around India approved a fatwa against terrorism Saturday at a conference in Hyderabad.

Do you know what that means?

الشعب يريد اسقاط النظام
...show me the schematic

2008-11-10 14:13:16

#9

KEN-JENNINGS: I am all that is MOD!; +2,984|6937|949

Beduin wrote:
lowing wrote:
I am sorry, according you guys Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. so what does this guy know?
HYDERABAD, India, Nov. 8 (UPI) -- About 6,000 Muslim clerics from around India approved a fatwa against terrorism Saturday at a conference in Hyderabad.
Do you know what that means?

It means Islam is creating its own War on Terror! Who will win first!?

2008-11-10 14:15:14

#10

mikkel: Member; +383|6906

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:
Beduin wrote:
lowing wrote:
I am sorry, according you guys Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. so what does this guy know?
HYDERABAD, India, Nov. 8 (UPI) -- About 6,000 Muslim clerics from around India approved a fatwa against terrorism Saturday at a conference in Hyderabad.
Do you know what that means?
It means Islam is creating its own War on Terror! Who will win first!?

Who gets the virgins when a suicide bomber bombs another suicide bomber?

2008-11-10 14:21:34

#11

SgtHeihn: Should have ducked; +394|6792|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

The radicals will. They have a better infrastructure and more funding.

They can go about calling this all they want, but it is not going to make much difference. It is always the small minority that fucks it up for the majority.

2008-11-10 14:46:44

#12

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6860

SgtHeihn wrote:
They have a better infrastructure and more funding.

Caves, 'boxcutters' and RPGs?

versus -

https://farm4.static.flickr.com/3141/2333360576_5488ec9974.jpg?v=0

Last edited by CameronPoe (2008-11-10 14:47:28)

2008-11-10 14:52:22

#13

SgtHeihn: Should have ducked; +394|6792|Ham Lake, MN (Fucking Cold)

The whole of the Islamic world is not going to rise up against them. Hell half the royal families have members giving money to terror groups.

2008-11-10 14:55:03

#14

usmarine: Banned; +2,785|7066

CameronPoe wrote:
SgtHeihn wrote:
They have a better infrastructure and more funding.
Caves, 'boxcutters' and RPGs?

versus -

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3141/233 … 74.jpg?v=0

bad example. that place is kind of a ghost town. if you removed the migrant workers, you would feel very lonely.

2008-11-10 15:06:11

#15

CameronPoe: Member; +2,925|6860

usmarine wrote:
bad example. that place is kind of a ghost town. if you removed the migrant workers, you would feel very lonely.

It's indicative of funds and infrastructure, as mentioned by Hein.

2008-11-10 15:57:31

#16

Turquoise: O Canada; +1,596|6710|North Carolina

SgtHeihn wrote:
The whole of the Islamic world is not going to rise up against them. Hell half the royal families have members giving money to terror groups.

Bingo... Certain Islamic countries will fight terror with us, but almost all of them will have their "family friends."

9/11 was largely the result of funding that came from a high level Pakistani official that we worked with in the War on Terror before we even called it that.

As long as a few powerful people in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and in many other countries support terrorism, major acts of terror will occasionally get past our defenses.

2008-11-10 16:17:41

#17

NgoDamWei: Member; +7|5968|Western North Carolina

What virgins ? They've only been recycled 383,000 times each (+/- a bunch of who fuking cares about 'em nows).

Oh, I forgot, as of earlier today there's a new supply enroute:

"BAGHDAD - A suicide bomber Monday struck a crowd rushing to help schoolgirls trapped in a bus by an earlier bombing. The Interior Ministry said at least 31 people were killed ..."

Must have been at least 1 virgin amoungst the lot, yes ?

Pretty pathetic way to maintain the inventory, don't ya' think ?

Surely there's a non aggressive altrustic EU solution out there ... (sounds of silence).

Come on all you Frenchmen !! Offer up a nuclear reactor so they can regain a parity of esteem !

BF2S Forums Muslim Clerics guilty of Appeasement

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

TheAussieReaper wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

lowing wrote:

Beduin wrote:

lowing wrote:

KEN-JENNINGS wrote:

Beduin wrote:

lowing wrote:

SgtHeihn wrote:

CameronPoe wrote:

SgtHeihn wrote:

usmarine wrote:

SgtHeihn wrote:

Board footer